User talk:Abudabanas: Difference between revisions
Macedonian (talk | contribs) Reverted 1 edit by 2A02:587:800B:200:B5FA:3FD9:CE72:E545 (talk): Rm forum-like comments |
Macedonian (talk | contribs) m Undid revision 1011537576 by Macedonian (talk) Rv self |
||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
Αν οι παοκτσήδες είναι πρόβατα και με μυαλά σουρωτήρια, τότε εσύ που κάποια στιγμή οδηγήθηκες στο να συμφωνήσεις μαζί μου, πρέπει να είσαι πανέξυπνος φίλε. Μυαλό ξυράφι και ισχυρογνώμων πολύ. Το αντίθετο από τα πρόβατα, σταθερός στις απόψεις σου. Δε ξέρω αν υπάρχει και χαρακτηρισμός για αυτόν που χειραγωγειται από ένα πρόβατο. Δυο φορές πρόβατο; Προβατοπρόβατο; Ή πρέπει να ψάξουμε αλλού στο ζωικό βασίλειο... Γαύρος μήπως; Δε ξέρω. |
Αν οι παοκτσήδες είναι πρόβατα και με μυαλά σουρωτήρια, τότε εσύ που κάποια στιγμή οδηγήθηκες στο να συμφωνήσεις μαζί μου, πρέπει να είσαι πανέξυπνος φίλε. Μυαλό ξυράφι και ισχυρογνώμων πολύ. Το αντίθετο από τα πρόβατα, σταθερός στις απόψεις σου. Δε ξέρω αν υπάρχει και χαρακτηρισμός για αυτόν που χειραγωγειται από ένα πρόβατο. Δυο φορές πρόβατο; Προβατοπρόβατο; Ή πρέπει να ψάξουμε αλλού στο ζωικό βασίλειο... Γαύρος μήπως; Δε ξέρω. |
||
[[User:Abudabanas|Abudabanas]] ([[User talk:Abudabanas#top|talk]]) 07:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Κοίτα. Οι Γαύροι είναι έξυπνοι και τίμιοι. Οι βάζελοι ρουφιάνοι και ψεύτες, τα χανούμια πονηροί και οι Παοκτζήδες όρθια γελάδια. Πραγματικά ποιο βλάκες δεν έχω ξαναδεί. Αυτή είναι η πραγματικότητα. Συμμάχησαν μάλιστα οι τρείς (ρουφιάνοι, λαμόγια, βλάκες) και εξυγιαίνονται. Ο Βαγγέλας σας χορεύει όλους μαζί με ... έξαψη. Ας είναι. |
|||
:::Λένε πως χαρακτηριστικό του βλάκα είναι ότι ανακατεύεται σε θέματα που δεν τον αφορούν. Εσύ τι ζόρι τραβάς αν ΟΣΦΠ-ΠΑΟ έπαιξαν ή όχι τελικό το 1962 κι αν ήταν φιναλίστ ή όχι? Τι σε νοιάζει. Τι κέρδος έχεις? Τίποτα! Οπαδός της παύλας είσαι, αλλά παύλα δεν υπάρχει παραμόνο στα μυαλά του...Κόλκα και στο καρδιογράφημα των νεκρών. Εσύ γράφεις, άρα η καρδιά σου δουλεύει.--[[Special:Contributions/2A02:587:800B:200:B5FA:3FD9:CE72:E545|2A02:587:800B:200:B5FA:3FD9:CE72:E545]] ([[User talk:2A02:587:800B:200:B5FA:3FD9:CE72:E545|talk]]) 11:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:35, 11 March 2021
Speedy deletion nomination of Panathinaikos and PAOK rivalry
Hello Abudabanas,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Panathinaikos and PAOK rivalry for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Mdy66 (talk) 18:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Panathinaikos and PAOK rivalry
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Panathinaikos and PAOK rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 18:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Abudabanas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Abudabanas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
April 2019
Your recent editing history at 2017–18 Superleague Greece shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 18:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to 2017–18 Superleague Greece has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Dr. K. 21:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abudabanas, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Dr. K. 00:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abudabanas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
SPI
Please don't edit the archives. They're closed. Finished. Done. Move on. Cabayi (talk) 12:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Cabayi: OK. Still learning and studying Wikipedia terms of use. Moving on. Thank you.Abudabanas (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
The information I deleted had been previously tagged and was re-added to the article, still without any sources, or any indication that amount of statistics was relevant to the article. Eldumpo (talk) 19:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Eldumpo: Of course they are relevant, the article is about a local football rivalry between 2 teams from the same city and there were two templates containing all Greek Superleague and Greek Cup head-to-head matches. What can be more relevant to this? I created the templates some years ago and many contributed later on. Still can't understand why they were removed. I can add references and sources if you want to. I think you should undo your edits. A Wikipedia football rivalry article without the head-to-head statistics is not complete in my opinion. Thank you Abudabanas (talk) 08:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
List of PAOK FC records and statistics moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of PAOK FC records and statistics, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 10:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- @OxonAlex: I added a lot of references and tags on the article. I think it is ready for mainspace and with little help from other users some of the statistics will be written down. Thank you Abudabanas (talk) 17:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Abudabanas, Thanks. I've moved it back now. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
PAOK kit evolution
per WP:NOTGALLERY and WP:CRUFT. I have done this I the past and had my edit reverted by a senior editor for the same reasons. cheers! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Nikolaos Sotiriadis
Hi I just wanted to let you know that I've reverted your edit at PAOK FC, because on the English Wiki it's best to link articles to other English articles otherwise people who click on the link will be faced with a bunch of Greek writing which they may not understand! . But don't worry I have already created a draft for him. Please feel free to help or expand as you can apparently read Greek while I can't! The draft is here. Cheers! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Dikaiosynh
Are you a puppet of Dikaiosynh? I think it's time to end your career here.--Kyopa (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kyopa: Merry Christmas Kyopa! You have no sense of humor at all. Keep reverting on Greek Football Cup man, no problem. Cheers! Abudabanas (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year Abudabanas!
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
He's back
Kyopa is back. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- I know and I am not surprised. More than expected. I think that Greek Football Cup and List of Greek Cup finals will need page protection. It's the next step, wright? Abudabanas (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yup. Although it would need to wait until he has done it a couple more times. To provide proof that he will not stop. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Επίμονοι βανδαλισμοί
Θέλω μόνο να μου πεις ένα πράγμα. Εκεί στην Αγγλία θεωρούν άλλο πράγμα τον Φιναλίστ και άλλο τον επιλαχόντα (Runner up)? Αυτή η απορία με βασανίζει. Ελπίζω να μπεις στον κόπο να μου απαντήσεις και να μην με σβήσεις ή να με καταγγείλεις στους διαχειριστές. Τώρα ποιος είναι επίμονος και βάνδαλος παίζεται. Πάντως εγώ δεν καταφεύγω σε διαχειριστές για κανένα λόγο. Τις διαφωνίες τις λύνω μόνος μου, με αυτόν που διαφωνώ. 2A02:587:800B:200:A0BF:E2A6:A03E:7C27 (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Δεν έχω να σου απαντήσω τίποτα. Δεν έχει νόημα φίλε. Εχεις φάει σκάλωμα με αρκετά στατιστικά στη Wiki κι εγώ ειλικρινά δε μπορώ να το καταλάβω αυτό το σκάλωμα όσο βαμμένος κι αν είναι κάποιος οπαδικά. Και η φάση είναι ότι έρχονται πόσοι ξένοι users και σε διαψεύδουν κι εσύ επιμένεις. Αμα επιμένεις τόσο, πήγαινε γράψε ένα βιβλίο με την ιστορία του Ολυμπιακού και γράψτα όπως θέλεις. Εδώ ένα edit πρέπει να είναι επιβεβαιωμένο από πηγές και αποδεκτό από την κοινότητα για να ανέβεi και να μείνει. Μ' εσένα απλά δε βγαίνει άκρη. Abudabanas (talk) 09:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Το να προσθέτω μια ήττα στον Ολυμπιακό και τον Παναθηναϊκό (γιατί αυτό κάνω), δεν δείχνει σκάλωμα. Αντίθετα εσύ τους την αποσιωπάς αν και είσαι ΠΑΟΚ. Αν εγώ είμαι Ολυμπιακός κάνω κακό στην ομάδα μου έτσι. Άρα το πρόβλημα είναι άλλο. Θα ήμουν αγενής αν έλεγα ότι είσαι απλά βλάκας, αλλά δεν το λέω. Απλά δεν μπορείς να αντιληφθείς την τρίτη διάσταση. Σε φιλώ.--2A02:587:800B:200:3562:E67F:E7F3:77E4 (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Πρώτον, μία συμβουλή. Επειδή στο μέλλον μπορεί να βρεθείς κάποια στιγμή σε μία παρόμοια κατάσταση, δηλαδή να έχεις μία άποψη και να υπάρχουν άλλοι 6-7 που να διαφωνούν μαζί σου, να ξέρεις ότι το κλειδί για να λύσεις το πρόβλημα σε τέτοιες περιπτώσεις φίλε μου, είναι το να σκεφτείς λογικά. Δεύτερον, να ξέρεις ότι την άποψη σου όπως και τα λεγόμενα σου εδώ και μήνες στη Wiki, τα ενστερνίζομαι βαθύτατα και τα έχω γραμμένα...Φιλάκια Abudabanas (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ήμουν βέβαιος. Το είχα καταλάβει ότι έχεις πάρει το θέμα σοβαρά, όταν έλεγες στον REDMAN ότι σε αρρωσταίνει η κατάσταση. Δεν χρειάζεται να τα γράφεις όμως. Το μυαλό ενός Παοκτζή συγκρατεί τόσα, όσο ένα σουρωτήρι μπορεί. Επίσης πάντα διαφωνώ με τις Πάπιες, ειδικά αν είναι 6-7, και με τα Πρόβατα τα ασπρόμαυρα.--2A02:587:800B:200:585C:7526:434E:2298 (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Αν οι παοκτσήδες είναι πρόβατα και με μυαλά σουρωτήρια, τότε εσύ που κάποια στιγμή οδηγήθηκες στο να συμφωνήσεις μαζί μου, πρέπει να είσαι πανέξυπνος φίλε. Μυαλό ξυράφι και ισχυρογνώμων πολύ. Το αντίθετο από τα πρόβατα, σταθερός στις απόψεις σου. Δε ξέρω αν υπάρχει και χαρακτηρισμός για αυτόν που χειραγωγειται από ένα πρόβατο. Δυο φορές πρόβατο; Προβατοπρόβατο; Ή πρέπει να ψάξουμε αλλού στο ζωικό βασίλειο... Γαύρος μήπως; Δε ξέρω. Abudabanas (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Κοίτα. Οι Γαύροι είναι έξυπνοι και τίμιοι. Οι βάζελοι ρουφιάνοι και ψεύτες, τα χανούμια πονηροί και οι Παοκτζήδες όρθια γελάδια. Πραγματικά ποιο βλάκες δεν έχω ξαναδεί. Αυτή είναι η πραγματικότητα. Συμμάχησαν μάλιστα οι τρείς (ρουφιάνοι, λαμόγια, βλάκες) και εξυγιαίνονται. Ο Βαγγέλας σας χορεύει όλους μαζί με ... έξαψη. Ας είναι.
- Λένε πως χαρακτηριστικό του βλάκα είναι ότι ανακατεύεται σε θέματα που δεν τον αφορούν. Εσύ τι ζόρι τραβάς αν ΟΣΦΠ-ΠΑΟ έπαιξαν ή όχι τελικό το 1962 κι αν ήταν φιναλίστ ή όχι? Τι σε νοιάζει. Τι κέρδος έχεις? Τίποτα! Οπαδός της παύλας είσαι, αλλά παύλα δεν υπάρχει παραμόνο στα μυαλά του...Κόλκα και στο καρδιογράφημα των νεκρών. Εσύ γράφεις, άρα η καρδιά σου δουλεύει.--2A02:587:800B:200:B5FA:3FD9:CE72:E545 (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Κοίτα. Οι Γαύροι είναι έξυπνοι και τίμιοι. Οι βάζελοι ρουφιάνοι και ψεύτες, τα χανούμια πονηροί και οι Παοκτζήδες όρθια γελάδια. Πραγματικά ποιο βλάκες δεν έχω ξαναδεί. Αυτή είναι η πραγματικότητα. Συμμάχησαν μάλιστα οι τρείς (ρουφιάνοι, λαμόγια, βλάκες) και εξυγιαίνονται. Ο Βαγγέλας σας χορεύει όλους μαζί με ... έξαψη. Ας είναι.