User talk:212.63.119.106

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Haigh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 11:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Citation number 2 has no relevance to the sentence. Haigh was never a partner at Detained in Dubai. Companies House shows that. And the citation doesn't show anything to back up Haigh's lie that he was a partner

Haigh was never a partner at Detained in Dubai. Companies House shows that. And the citation doesn't show anything to back up Haigh's lie that he was a partner

Haigh was never a partner at Detained in Dubai. Companies House shows that. And the citation doesn't show anything to back up Haigh's lie that he was a partner.

I provided citations that demonstrate clearly Haigh's continual lies. If Wikipedia is only a tool for false self promotion, then what use is it? How is it different from Inatagram?