Talk:The Dream of Ossian: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Christian75 (talk | contribs) Assessment (B): banner shell, Visual arts, Nudity (Rater) |
m Transcluding GA review |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|23:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:GeneralPoxter|GeneralPoxter]] ([[User talk:GeneralPoxter|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=|note=}} |
{{GA nominee|23:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:GeneralPoxter|GeneralPoxter]] ([[User talk:GeneralPoxter|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=onreview|note=}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Visual arts |class= B |listas= Dream of Ossian, The}} |
{{WikiProject Visual arts |class= B |listas= Dream of Ossian, The}} |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{Did you know nominations/The Dream of Ossian}} |
{{Did you know nominations/The Dream of Ossian}} |
||
{{Talk:The Dream of Ossian/GA1}} |
|||
Revision as of 10:02, 30 June 2021
 | The Dream of Ossian is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by GeneralPoxter (talk) at 23:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from The Dream of Ossian appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 17:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
The Dream of Ossian (1813) by Ingres
- ... that The Dream of Ossian (pictured) by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres was painted in 1813 for Napoleon's bedroom? Sources: Gow 2018 and Fondation Napoléon
- Reviewed: Vertraut den neuen Wegen
Created by GeneralPoxter (talk). Self-nominated at 20:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough, QPQ done. Image is properly licensed (and a Valued image on Commons). Neutral, well cited, and not violating copyright. Hook fact is interesting and cited inline. I find the issue with Ingres planning to change the painting from an oval to a rectangular format slightly confusing: is it correct that he did change the format, but did not go through with other plans to change it? Perhaps you can clarify. Other than that I am happy.
—Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 21:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, the painting was made rectangular, but some compositional changes that were part of that reformatting were not complete. GeneralPoxter (talk) 21:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough, QPQ done. Image is properly licensed (and a Valued image on Commons). Neutral, well cited, and not violating copyright. Hook fact is interesting and cited inline. I find the issue with Ingres planning to change the painting from an oval to a rectangular format slightly confusing: is it correct that he did change the format, but did not go through with other plans to change it? Perhaps you can clarify. Other than that I am happy.
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Dream of Ossian/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jburlinson (talk · contribs) 09:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
I'll be glad to review this nomination. Should take no more than 5 days for an initial response. More to come!--Jburlinson (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Very well written and organized article. I only have a couple of comments.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The lead seems a little undernourished. It might help to highlight a couple of significant details from the body of the article. Particularly, the evaluative comment in the lead is quite negative, while the article contains some more positive responses that might be used to balance the impression left by the lead and further enhance the notability of the subject.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- Expanded. GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 12:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Also, the sub-section labeled "Fate" is a little ambiguous. It likely refers to the final disposition of the painting, but there's a possibility that it might refer to Napoleon's military exploits or even a theme depicted in the artwork. I'd suggest simply deleting this heading and including the material under the general section "History".
- Subsection headers removed. GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 12:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Also, the sub-section labeled "Fate" is a little ambiguous. It likely refers to the final disposition of the painting, but there's a possibility that it might refer to Napoleon's military exploits or even a theme depicted in the artwork. I'd suggest simply deleting this heading and including the material under the general section "History".
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Very close to GA, only a couple of items that needed adjustment before the final stamp of approval.--Jburlinson (talk) 12:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- @Jburlinson: Thanks for the review! I addressed the points your raised; please let me know if there's more I can do. GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 12:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Very good job. Thank you for making such quality contributions to the artwork articles in WP.--Jburlinson (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Jburlinson: Thanks for the review! I addressed the points your raised; please let me know if there's more I can do. GeneralPoxter (talk • contribs) 12:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)