Talk:Lori Lightfoot: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:11, 28 May 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lori Lightfoot article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clearly Notable

There's currently a template on the article calling Lightfoot's notability into question. Prior to Mayor Emanuel's withdrawal, Lightfoot was polling above 10% in a Chicago mayoral election where no candidate was polling above ~20%. And as of July, Lightfoot had raised more funds than anyone else. Billbrock (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Also see this Chicago Sun-Times article (obviously name recognition is an issue for her). 16:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC) Billbrock (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove notability template. Billbrock (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and understand Wikipedia's notability criteria by following the links provided in the notability template. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did so, although (being a lazy Chicagoan) I made a bald assertion rather than citing multiple independent sources. (The McDonald/Van Dyke trial is the central event in Chicago news; she has been a pivotal player.) So here goes: Lightfoot reports $243K in campaign cash, tops among Emanuel challengers; Lori Lightfoot's ethics plan targets side jobs, mayoral term limits and would bolster city watchdog; Chicago mayor's race: Who is in, who is out and who is still thinking about it; Will lawyers deliver for Lori Lightfoot's campaign?; Mayoral challenger Lori Lightfoot brands city violence a ‘public health crisis’. Billbrock (talk) 01:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Being a lazy Chicagoan, you nevertheless found sources. Why don't you force yourself a bit more , - reread the notability notice once again, especially the part "Please help to establish notability by citing..." Unfortunately Wikipedcia administrators were probably lazy as well, since they did not write it clearly: "Please help to establish notability by expanding the article citing ". Because citing the sources in the talk page is good for a good talk, but not for the article, in which the text of the tag is nearly half of the page :-) Staszek Lem (talk) 18:30, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please capitalize the section 2019 mayoral candidate to 2019 Mayoral Candidate 12.178.189.58 (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia's manual of style, it's actually correct as written. Section headers are written in sentence case, with only the first word (and proper names) capitalized - not in title case, where nearly all words are capitalized. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Do we have any way of getting a better photo of her? Anecdotally, a lot of sources seem to be using the same photo we have. She'll be appearing in public a lot over the next month or so...Dotdh15 (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lori Lightfoot with supporter (cropped).jpg

Is this image really appropriate for the page? It's very low quality and the supporter has more of a presence than Lightfoot. Spengouli (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Image

Perhaps using an image from her victory or at a debate is better. This image is old and I believe she does not wear glasses anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.133.85.73 (talk) 18:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Official Portrait of Mayor Lori Lightfoot 2019.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Lori Lightfoot, Mayor of Chicago.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2021

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Lori Lightfoot. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Change “After enacting this racist behavior against The Daily Caller reporter Thomas Catenacci she was sued by the magazine.”

to

“After enacting this policy against The Daily Caller reporter Thomas Catenacci, she was sued by the magazine.” 172.103.208.29 (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but added more context from the source. POLITANVM ^talk 23:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:34, 28 May 2021 edit 172.103.208.29 (talk) →Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2021: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:11, 28 May 2021 edit undo Politanvm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 10,120 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2021: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:

	“After enacting this policy against The Daily Caller reporter Thomas Catenacci, she was sued by the magazine.” [[Special:Contributions/172.103.208.29\|172.103.208.29]] ([[User talk:172.103.208.29\|talk]]) 22:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)		“After enacting this policy against The Daily Caller reporter Thomas Catenacci, she was sued by the magazine.” [[Special:Contributions/172.103.208.29\|172.103.208.29]] ([[User talk:172.103.208.29\|talk]]) 22:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

			:{{done}}, but added more context from the source. [[User:Politanvm\|<span style="background: linear-gradient(gray, #111111); color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, Georgia;">POLITANVM</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Politanvm\|talk]]</sup> 23:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)