Gerd Lüdemann: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In 1999, Lüdemann published ''Der große Betrug: Und was Jesus wirklich sagte und tat'' (The Great Deception: And What Jesus Really Said and Did), in which he claimed that only about five per cent of the sayings attributed to Jesus are genuine and the historical evidence does not support the arguments of traditional Christianity. Even though Lüdemann explicitly rejected the mission of the school which was the "preparation of the students seeking to become ministers of the Church", Lüdemann refused to step down even though he did not acknowledge or support the departments mission. As Lüdemann put it, 'the person of Jesus himself becomes insufficient as a foundation of faith once most of the New Testament statements about him have proved to be later interpretations by the community'.<ref name = decline>Gerd Lüdemann, 'The Decline of Academic Theology at Göttingen', ''Religion'' (2002) 32, 87–94 {{doi|10.1006/reli.2002.0411}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=|first=|title=Appendix|journal=Religion|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1006/reli.2002.0424|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|year=2002|volume=32|issue=2|pages=141–142|doi=10.1006/reli.2002.0424|s2cid=219594838}}</ref> |
In 1999, Lüdemann published ''Der große Betrug: Und was Jesus wirklich sagte und tat'' (The Great Deception: And What Jesus Really Said and Did), in which he claimed that only about five per cent of the sayings attributed to Jesus are genuine and the historical evidence does not support the arguments of traditional Christianity. Even though Lüdemann explicitly rejected the mission of the school which was the "preparation of the students seeking to become ministers of the Church", Lüdemann refused to step down even though he did not acknowledge or support the departments mission. As Lüdemann put it, 'the person of Jesus himself becomes insufficient as a foundation of faith once most of the New Testament statements about him have proved to be later interpretations by the community'.<ref name = decline>Gerd Lüdemann, 'The Decline of Academic Theology at Göttingen', ''Religion'' (2002) 32, 87–94 {{doi|10.1006/reli.2002.0411}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=|first=|title=Appendix|journal=Religion|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1006/reli.2002.0424|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|year=2002|volume=32|issue=2|pages=141–142|doi=10.1006/reli.2002.0424|s2cid=219594838}}</ref> |
||
The Confederation of Protestant Churches in Lower Saxony called for his dismissal from the Chair of New Testament Studies, not because of any "critical statements or claims of research", but rather because, by his own admission, he did not agree with their mission. His dismissal was rejected by the state government of [[Lower Saxony]] and as a result, a search for a new Chair of New Testament Studies was instituted, and Lüdemann was retained and reassigned to a new position in New Testament studies. <ref name = statement>'Statement of the Dean in regard to the Academic position to be Held by Professor Dr Gerd Lüdemann', ''Religion'' (2002) 32, 141-142 {{doi|10.1006/reli.2002.0424}}</ref> All his courses were thereafter "explicitly identified as 'outside of the programs of study required for the training of future ministers of the Church'." |
The Confederation of Protestant Churches in Lower Saxony called for his dismissal from the Chair of New Testament Studies, not because of any "critical statements or claims of research", but rather because, by his own admission, he did not agree with their mission. His dismissal was rejected by the state government of [[Lower Saxony]] and as a result, a search for a new Chair of New Testament Studies was instituted, and Lüdemann was retained and reassigned to a new position in New Testament studies. <ref name = statement>'Statement of the Dean in regard to the Academic position to be Held by Professor Dr Gerd Lüdemann', ''Religion'' (2002) 32, 141-142 {{doi|10.1006/reli.2002.0424}}</ref> All his courses were thereafter "explicitly identified as 'outside of the programs of study required for the training of future ministers of the Church'."<ref name = statement/> Lüdemann complained and wrote "The Decline of Academic Theology at Göttingen" where he put the school on blast, complaining that 'most of my colleagues have long since left the principles of the Church behind them yet still seek to attach themselves to this tradition by symbolic interpretation and by other interpretative skills'.<ref name = decline/> |
||
In 1997 and in 2002, he debated [[William Lane Craig]] over Jesus' resurrection.<ref>{{YouTube|5qCdv7VCunE}}</ref> |
In 1997 and in 2002, he debated [[William Lane Craig]] over Jesus' resurrection.<ref>{{YouTube|5qCdv7VCunE}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 22:47, 2 June 2021
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2019) |
Gerd Lüdemann (born 5 July 1946 in Visselhövede, Lower Saxony died 23 May 2021[1] in Göttingen), is a German New Testament scholar and historian. He taught this subject from 1983 to 1999 at the Faculty of Theology of the University of Göttingen. Since 1999 he has taught there with a special status as Chair of History and Literature of Early Christianity. He is married with four children and seven grandchildren. After periods of teaching and research at McMaster University (1977–79) and Vanderbilt University (1979–82), he was appointed in 1983 to the Chair in New Testament Studies in the Theological Faculty of the University of Göttingen.
In 1999, Lüdemann published Der große Betrug: Und was Jesus wirklich sagte und tat (The Great Deception: And What Jesus Really Said and Did), in which he claimed that only about five per cent of the sayings attributed to Jesus are genuine and the historical evidence does not support the arguments of traditional Christianity. Even though Lüdemann explicitly rejected the mission of the school which was the "preparation of the students seeking to become ministers of the Church", Lüdemann refused to step down even though he did not acknowledge or support the departments mission. As Lüdemann put it, 'the person of Jesus himself becomes insufficient as a foundation of faith once most of the New Testament statements about him have proved to be later interpretations by the community'.[2][3]
The Confederation of Protestant Churches in Lower Saxony called for his dismissal from the Chair of New Testament Studies, not because of any "critical statements or claims of research", but rather because, by his own admission, he did not agree with their mission. His dismissal was rejected by the state government of Lower Saxony and as a result, a search for a new Chair of New Testament Studies was instituted, and Lüdemann was retained and reassigned to a new position in New Testament studies. [4] All his courses were thereafter "explicitly identified as 'outside of the programs of study required for the training of future ministers of the Church'."[4] Lüdemann complained and wrote "The Decline of Academic Theology at Göttingen" where he put the school on blast, complaining that 'most of my colleagues have long since left the principles of the Church behind them yet still seek to attach themselves to this tradition by symbolic interpretation and by other interpretative skills'.[2]
In 1997 and in 2002, he debated William Lane Craig over Jesus' resurrection.[5]
References
- ^ https://www.gedenkseiten.de/gerd-luedemann/kondolenzbuch/. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ a b Gerd Lüdemann, 'The Decline of Academic Theology at Göttingen', Religion (2002) 32, 87–94 doi:10.1006/reli.2002.0411
- ^ "Appendix". Religion. 32 (2): 141–142. 2002. doi:10.1006/reli.2002.0424. S2CID 219594838.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b 'Statement of the Dean in regard to the Academic position to be Held by Professor Dr Gerd Lüdemann', Religion (2002) 32, 141-142 doi:10.1006/reli.2002.0424
- ^ Video on YouTube
External links
