Talk:Dyslexia interventions: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:22, 14 March 2023

Dyslexia (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dyslexia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia

Disability Redirect‑class

	Dyslexia interventions is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Orthography is key to any form of dyslexia managment

Orthography is key to any management of dyslexia as it determines the skills required to perform the task of reading, it also determines the cognitive skill deficits that can cause dyslexia and therefore dictates the form of any interventions that may be required. dolfrog (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative therapies

I take issue with the "Alternative therapies" section of this article, as it appears to be giving these treatments undue weight. While I have no issue with them being included in the article, I feel it should somehow be made clear that these treatments are generally unsupported by science. What I mean is, something should be included like in the lead of the linked Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities article, i.e. "These therapies generally rely on theories that have little scientific basis, lacking well-controlled, large, randomized trials to demonstrate safety and efficacy; small trials that have reported beneficial effects can be generally explained by the ordinary waxing and waning of the underlying conditions." However, I can't seem to come up with and adequately brief and concise way of doing so, so thought I should bring it up here. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ ^(talk) 17:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dyslexia interventions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131202233331/http://www.streamlinetext.com/WhatIsStreamlineTxt.aspx to http://www.streamlinetext.com/WhatIsStreamlineTxt.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 == Alternative therapies ==
-I take issue with the "Alternative therapies" section of this article, as it appears to be giving these treatments [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]]. While I have no issue with them being included in the article, I feel it should somehow be made clear that these treatments are generally unsupported by science. What I mean is, something should be included like in the lead of the linked [[:Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities]] article, i.e. ''"These therapies generally rely on theories that have little scientific basis, lacking well-controlled, large, randomized trials to demonstrate safety and efficacy; small trials that have reported beneficial effects can be generally explained by the ordinary waxing and waning of the underlying conditions."'' However, I can't seem to come up with and adequately brief and concise way of doing so, so thought I should bring it up here. <font face="sans-serif">'''[[user:Alphathon|<font color="#900">Alphathon</font>]]'''&nbsp;<small>/'æl.f'æ.θɒn/&nbsp;<sup>([[user talk:Alphathon|<font color="#900">talk</font>]])</sup></small></font> 17:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
+I take issue with the "Alternative therapies" section of this article, as it appears to be giving these treatments [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]]. While I have no issue with them being included in the article, I feel it should somehow be made clear that these treatments are generally unsupported by science. What I mean is, something should be included like in the lead of the linked [[:Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities]] article, i.e. ''"These therapies generally rely on theories that have little scientific basis, lacking well-controlled, large, randomized trials to demonstrate safety and efficacy; small trials that have reported beneficial effects can be generally explained by the ordinary waxing and waning of the underlying conditions."'' However, I can't seem to come up with and adequately brief and concise way of doing so, so thought I should bring it up here. <span style="font-family: sans-serif;">'''[[user:Alphathon|<span style="color: #900;">Alphathon</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>/'æl.f'æ.θɒn/&nbsp;<sup>([[user talk:Alphathon|<span style="color: #900;">talk</span>]])</sup></small></span> 17:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 == External links modified ==