User:Zsinj: Difference between revisions
That’s better |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Admin Dashboard == |
== Admin Dashboard == |
||
<!-- Feel free to copy this for your purposes, or transclude it directly --><div id="admin_dashboard"> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<!-- please don't delete this --><span style="display: none;">[[User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users]]</span><!-- it tells me who's using --><noinclude> |
|||
{{shortcut|T:ADMINDASH}}{{clear}} |
|||
</noinclude>{{Admin dashboard/header}} |
|||
<includeonly>{{strip categories|Template:Admin dashboard}}</includeonly> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}} |
|||
{{Admin dashboard/csd}} |
|||
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}} |
|||
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp |
|||
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}| |
|||
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|yes}}}}} |
|||
Revision as of 02:47, 8 July 2021
You're reached Zsinj's userpage. If you'd like to leave me a message, you're more than welcome to.
Admin Dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 2a00:23c7:80a3:6701:8323:4f4:4f74:c350 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- MotorsportsGod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- GD234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2400:9800:291:2BFD:81FD:88E4:94EB:E3C2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Indonesia-based IP resumed disruptive edits on George Town, Penang article after the article had been semi-protected, identical to 2400:9800:200:43D4:90D1:F6A2:D18B:58F1, in complete disregard to a discussion started in the talk page. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Partially blocked. 2400:9800:200:0:0:0:0:0/40 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) for two weeks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| Attack pages | 0 |
| Copyright violations | 0 |
| Hoaxes | 1 |
| Vandalism | 0 |
| User requested | 3 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 2 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 3 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 5 |
| Other candidates | 5 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 38 items
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
User-reported
- NisonCo SEO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See https://nisonco.com Johnj1995 (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Diddyjumper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a offensive username Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mrdconcord (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal). Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See sandbox. Cyrobyte (talk) 04:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear 23:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 88.241.94.127 (talk · contribs). Steven Walling • talk 04:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs have reverted multiple attempts to keep this page a redirect. A standalone article here would be a GNG failure. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If the change is disputed via a reversion, an attempt should be made to reach a consensus before blank-and-redirecting again. Suitable venues for doing so include the article's talk page and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Several questionable(to say the least) posts have been created on there within the past couple days. There was an LLM issue, but I think that has been fixed. Some trolling. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined WP:ATPROT
Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption.
Steven Walling • talk 04:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Saudi Arabian–led intervention in Yemen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Multiple unsourced edits by Anon IPs. Disruptive changes on data, usage of Social Media. Mr.User200 (talk) 00:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 04:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Too high traffic for PCP. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 02:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit was over two weeks ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Biju Patnaik
Please Protect This Page = https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biju_Patnaik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vvhhsd25 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been some kind of game of vandalizing medical articles, and this one is not safe. Anonymous 04:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Presumed repeated conflict of interest violations. I'm requesting semi-protection to the article. Picaro31 (talk) 04:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —C.Fred (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection: Indonesia-based IPs resumed disruptive edits after semi-protection (which was requested for this same issue) was lifted. hundenvonPG (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. User partially blocked by Callanecc so I have lifted the protection I previously placed. @HundenvonPenang: If they resume from a different IP range, please feel free to file a new protection request. Also, it can be helpful to mention that you've filed a related report when submitting a request like this one. Please consider doing that in the future. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistance disruptive editing and WP:VAND from IP user need protection for indefinitely Godknowme1 (talk) 06:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I respectfully request autopatrol and patrol rights, based on my extensive experience and contributions to Wikipedia. With over 12 months of experience, I've created 60+ articles and improved 100+ others. Granting my request will streamline the New Page Patrol process. I previously requested these rights last month, which was denied. Since then, I've improved my contributions. I believe my dedication and improvement warrant reconsideration. Thank you for considering my request. Royalesignature (talk). 03:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I am requesting for this rights, because I have about 5 new articles that are yet to be reviewed and surely meets the notability criteria, I have been creating and improving articles especially on African Cinema and with this right, I hope to reduce the backlog on the new page reviewers log. Best regards, B.Korlah (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
To support WP:JAN25 I'd ideally like to be contributing to reducing the backlog as opposed to contributing to increasing the backlog at the same time. Overall in the last 25+ BLP articles I've created, there have been few to no edits made by NPR, aside from typos, grammar, and duplicate words. The first handful lacked certain templates, categories, default sorting, talk page banners, and the usual technical parts of articles, but I've since got to grips with including these. Since then I've only moved my drafts to mainspace, or created in mainspace, when I'm confident that there is enough SIGCOV and structure, and otherwise "incubate" articles not quite ready in draft space if not. I otherwise create quite a few redirects, with one disambiguated, and one batch up for discussion, but otherwise none deleted so far. Thanks for considering. CNC (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
An experienced editor with around 600 pages created, with few deleted; I've reviewed pages that they have created as part of NPP and they reach the standard expected without intervention. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Has created more than 200 articles, with none having been deleted. As part of NPP, I reviewed a recent creation, and found it to be complete without the need for editing. Reviewing other pages, they look to be similarly appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Meets the minimum criteria and appears to be familiar with the policies and guidelines surrounding article creation — a quick scan through her XTools list raises no red flags. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Rename from "Sir MemeGod", which is already on the list. Planning on whittling away at Category:Talk pages with comments before the first section. EF5 20:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC) EF5 20:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I arrived here from WP:POSTMOVE, and it's not my first time needing to clean up wikilinks from a recently moved page. This tool looks like it could save me a reasonable amount of time having to redirect links post move. Thanks in advance. CNC (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Hiya! A year ago I had AWB self-requested to be removed due to inactivity with it. Now, I think it's necessary for me to have this tool again to fix formatting issues and as part of the ongoing NPP drive. Thanks! ~ Tails Wx 02:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have use wikipedia since year 2021 and contribute regularly for the readers in wikipedia. I think it's time to get categorised in confirmed user because the contributions I make in past year. And there won't be any reason to request to denied. Thanks Genius64868 (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 300 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter, which are in my area of expertise. My recent edits also contributed significantly to upgrading the article History of the Jews in Tunisia from "Start-Class" to "B-Class." Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Not extended confirmed despite meeting criteria Heyaaaaalol (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
The backlog is getting insane and I just want to help. I have well over the needed edit count and time editing. History6042 (talk) 16:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help out with the January NPP drive, as I've participated in the other recent drives. I believe I meet the criteria for the NPR right after reviewing them. Thanks! — voidxor 21:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Rahmatula786 (talk) 08:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC) I understand that I am relatively new to Wikipedia, but I am well-versed in its policies and guidelines, particularly regarding notability, reliable sources, and neutral point of view. Being from Nepal, I have a strong familiarity with Nepali Wikipedia articles and their relevance. I am confident in my ability to identify reliable sources and distinguish them from paid or promotional content. Additionally, I can recognize conflicts of interest and promotional material that do not comply with Wikipedia's standards. If granted new page reviewer permissions, I would focus on reviewing pending articles related to Nepal, ensuring they meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I am committed to contributing constructively to the Wikipedia community. Thank you
I'd like to help with the backlog. I've created around two-dozen mainspace pages (including disambiguations) and 150 redirects and have participated in AfD discussions. – MW(t•c) 09:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
The backlog is insane, and I would like to do what I can to help reduce that. The backlog reduction drive does interest me, but I'm not in this for the recognition. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I've been giving feedback on new pages for sometime and would love to participate in the January NPP drive. I'm quite well versed on what the standards are and when I don't I look it up! Would be more than happy to assist. Marleeashton (talk) 09:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to join the NPP backlog drive! Spiralwidget (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request NPR rights to participate in the January backlog drive. I meet the criteria and have previously had NPR on a trial period for the last backlog drive. Thanks. Lordseriouspig 00:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been an AFC reviewer since March 2024 and am currently on probation. I want this flag to clear the backlog drive for next month (January 2025). Kindly read User_talk:Sohom_Datta#NPR_request for my previous decline cause conversation. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 15:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with the backlog drive. I've been active for about six months, mainly helping out in the Task Centre, and I've created four articles in that time. Thanks. Blackballnz (talk) 21:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
I've been an active new page & recent change patroller and love fixing up pages - I've seen the large backlog and would love to officially become a NPP to contribute and reduce it. I'm familiar with the deletion & creation process and have made and expanded quite a few articles. I wish to be part of the January backlog drive. I'm also a rollbacker and a pending changes reviewer. jolielover♥talk 11:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello I'm Ampil. I'm participating January 2025 drive. I have 78 AFC reviews and 19 accepts. My rights set to expire 10 days. Thanks. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 11:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
I want to apply for new page reviewer rights as I want to participate in January NPP backlog drive with the time I have in hand and the contributions I have been making from last few years. Hope it will be accepted.Gardenkur (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC) Gardenkur (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
I’ve been actively contributing and working diligently to improve the quality of pages. With a significant number of edits under my belt and extensive experience gained over time, I believe I am well-qualified to be granted new page patroller permissions. I’m eager to help tackle the growing backlog and ensure that new pages meet the required standards. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to take on this responsibility permanently. Ensconce (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
So I can participate in the News Page Patrol January backlog drive. I have participated in a New Page Patrol drive before, and wish to help again. :) Mason7512 (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to help out with the NPP backlog drive. I believe I fit all the minimum guidelines; I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and sufficient experience with quality control processes, as I engage with the deletion process, especially PROD and CSD, whenever possible and I help out WikiProjects by writing new articles. I try my best to communicate in a civil manner with editors in communication. In the scenario I get approved for this, I strive to review pages and reduce the backlog strictly on a volunteer basis, to contribute greatly to Wikipedia by reviewing pages with this duty. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is a massive backlog which I would love to help out in! Yeshivish613 (talk) 18:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I have been doing a lot of RM related stuff, including a few at RM/TR and closing them. I just meet the 3000 edit criteria and it's going to be helpful for me when closing RMs where the redirect page has more than one edit, and also helpful when I review draft submissions with an existing redirect. JuniperChill (talk) 12:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Sometimes, when I'm editing or creating math-related articles on Wikipedia, I see that some article titles are not formatted properly, like Artin L-function. I'd like to request page mover rights so I can fix these titles for math articles. I think I should be granted an exception to the 3000 edit rule because I've created several math articles, and I don't plan to stop soon. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 18:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I believe this could help me out with the current vandalism fighting I do that may involve pages with pending changes. I have read WP:RCP, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's P&Gs. Mon Bhai converse∫edits Mon Bhai (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Requesting Pending Changes reviewer permission - I am active editor for quite some time now and recently saw an alert for January New Page patrol backlog drive. I want to contribute to that, but thought I can start with Pending change reviewer first. I have a good understanding of wiki policies, and am continuing to familiarize myself with them. I have also read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Criteria_to_receive_this_permission and understand expectations for both gaining the rights and performing the pending changes. Asteramellus (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Malhar1234 (talk) 21:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
I patrol recent changes on occasion and have split part of Mikhail Gorbachev into General secretaryship of Mikhail Gorbachev. I have reverted countless non-constructive edits and I think I have enough experience to be a pending changes reviewer. I have also reviewed the GAN of Kiruko and Mizo Chieftainship. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 12:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Have been a part of Wikipedia for a while now, usually contributing with proofreading, rewriting for clarity, updating data, removing inaccurate data, etc. With most of my contributions being of an editing nature (rather than creating something new), I think that being able to approve pending edits from others would allow me to contribute more. ArtistPrime (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I previously asked for rollback rights back in November but was turned down with the reason given was I need more experience first. I'm here two months later to once again ask for rollback rights as it would make what I do a lot easier. Although I don't edit Wikipedia purely to revert vandalism, I come across my fair share of it or unsourced claims and stuff to that degree that need reverting. So I am once again asking for rollback rights as I took the previous advice on board. Lemonademan22 (talk) 6:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I requested template editor a few months ago for working on dark mode issues and got it for the rest of the year. However, it (turns out) (there are a lot of) dark mode related errors, a lot of which are in template protected templates or editnotices. Therefore I request a one year extension for this right. @Primefac: as the admin that originally gave this right. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? -
Can I work on the
|