Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Shan Lin (chemist): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:00, 14 July 2021

Yu-Shan Lin (chemist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Associate prof, seems a bit run of the mill, has an early career award, plus "Machine Learning in the Chemical Sciences & Engineering Award" doesn't seem notable as it's the inaugural award of it. I don't see how this article passes WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. I don't have a feel for if the citations are suitably high to pass on that basis, but I'm doubting it. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The Junior Faculty award is peanuts, but the Dreyfus Program award isn't - it comes with ~$100k. H-index in the 20s is generally regarded as okay around here, I believe. Not a celebrity but a scientist who is getting noticed, so I would say this is a weak keep. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a fan of this being written by a COI author. Even with this award, she's still an early career associate prof and this is too soon. Many of the publications in the h-index have 6+ authors so not as indicative, and there is no significant coverage about the subject here at all. Reywas92^Talk 18:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's no CoI issue with article creation because it came through AfC. — Charles Stewart (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per WP:NPROF#1 this is not stellar but passes the bar with an h-index of 24 and 13 papers with > 100 citations. --hroest 18:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Dr. Lin's Scopus citation metrics are around the median of 175 of her coauthors and coauthors-of-coauthors in this field (paper cutoff 14):

Total citations: avg: 6109, med: 2001, Lin: 2449.

Total papers: avg: 110, med: 53, L: 53.

h-index: avg: 30, med: 20, L: 23.

Top 5 citations: 1st: avg: 605, med: 275, L: 285. 2nd: avg: 348, med: 181, L: 253. 3rd: avg: 252, med: 136, L: 147. 4th: avg: 210, med: 118, L: 126. 5th: avg: 181, med: 106, L: 124.

Top first-author: avg: 339, med: 147, L: 124. JoelleJay (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :*There's no CoI issue with article creation because it came through AfC. &mdash; [[User:Chalst|''Charles Stewart'']] <small>[[User_talk:Chalst|(talk)]]</small> 08:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 *'''Weak keep''' per [[WP:NPROF]]#1 this is not stellar but passes the bar with an h-index of 24 and 13 papers with > 100 citations. --[[user:Hannes Röst|hroest]] 18:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
+*'''Weak delete'''. Dr. Lin's Scopus citation metrics are around the median of 175 of her coauthors and coauthors-of-coauthors in this field (paper cutoff 14):
+::'''Total citations''': avg: 6109, med: 2001, Lin: 2449.
+::'''Total papers''': avg: 110, med: 53, L: 53.
+::'''''h''-index''': avg: 30, med: 20, L: 23.
+::'''Top 5 citations''': '''1st''': avg: 605, med: 275, L: 285. '''2nd''': avg: 348, med: 181, L: 253. '''3rd''': avg: 252, med: 136, L: 147. '''4th''': avg: 210, med: 118, L: 126. '''5th''': avg: 181, med: 106, L: 124.
+::'''Top first-author''': avg: 339, med: 147, L: 124. [[User:JoelleJay|JoelleJay]] ([[User talk:JoelleJay|talk]]) 19:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)