Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid Kids: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:34, 29 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Proto||type 11:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid Kids

Delete non-notable. Aplomado - U T C 18:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Actually, the play has been reviewed by some notable newpapers according to this site [1] IrishGuy 18:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Edit Conflicted Keep and Clean Up. I'm not so sure; there's quite a bit of hits on Google here. It's definitely not a good article, but it seems like a notable play. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 18:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Revision as of 14:02, 10 September 2021 edit MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:34, 29 March 2022 edit undo MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*'''Edit Conflicted Keep and Clean Up'''. I'm not so sure; there's quite a bit of hits on Google [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22stupid+kids%22+john+russell&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official here]. It's definitely not a good article, but it seems like a notable play. — '''[[User:Rebelguys2\|Rebelguys2]]''' [[User talk:Rebelguys2\|<sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk</sup>]] 18:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)		*'''Edit Conflicted Keep and Clean Up'''. I'm not so sure; there's quite a bit of hits on Google [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22stupid+kids%22+john+russell&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official here]. It's definitely not a good article, but it seems like a notable play. — '''[[User:Rebelguys2\|Rebelguys2]]''' [[User talk:Rebelguys2\|<sup style="color:#CC5500;">talk</sup>]] 18:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>