Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlightGlobal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
FlightGlobal: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:FlightGlobal]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. There is no support for this proposal. [[User:Malcolmxl5|Malcolmxl5]] ([[User talk:Malcolmxl5|talk]]) 11:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
===[[:FlightGlobal]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=FlightGlobal}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlightGlobal|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 9#{{anchorencode:FlightGlobal}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|1=FlightGlobal}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlightGlobal|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 9#{{anchorencode:FlightGlobal}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 25: Line 30:
* '''Keep''' – Major name in the aerospace media sector and owner of the established ''Flight International'' magazine. Merging [[FlightGlobal]] into [[Flight International]] wouldn't make much sense either, in case anyone was going to propose that. --[[User:Deeday-UK|Deeday-UK]] ([[User talk:Deeday-UK|talk]]) 10:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' – Major name in the aerospace media sector and owner of the established ''Flight International'' magazine. Merging [[FlightGlobal]] into [[Flight International]] wouldn't make much sense either, in case anyone was going to propose that. --[[User:Deeday-UK|Deeday-UK]] ([[User talk:Deeday-UK|talk]]) 10:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' agree with all keep voters above. [[User:Webmaster862|Webmaster862]] ([[User talk:Webmaster862|talk]]) 08:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' agree with all keep voters above. [[User:Webmaster862|Webmaster862]] ([[User talk:Webmaster862|talk]]) 08:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 11:16, 16 September 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is no support for this proposal. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FlightGlobal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:GNG criteria for Organisation/Corporation. No notability, references are primary sourced and major WP:COI in that FlightGlobal Marketing is a major contributor of this article LukeWWF (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: Let's remain on topic of AfD and not the author. Being an Administrator does not nullify AfD requests from users: This is not Wikipedia policy. You will see User:MilborneOne has a lot of good contributions, but also a few deleted articles under similar procedure. LukeWWF (talk) 21:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: @LukeWWF: I see you have amended your COI claim above to now indicate major WP:COI in that FlightGlobal Marketing is a major contributor of this article. I would like to point out that this is also false. While User:FlightGlobal Marketing made two spammy COI edits to the article when it was first started, they were immediately reverted and their current net contributions to the article are exactly nil. You can note they were also blocked from editing in 2016 due to Promotional username, promotional edits. - Ahunt (talk) 19:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: Correct, I updated my comment for clarity. If you conduct a LinkedIn search for staff at FlightGlobal and reference users editing this article you will see a major COI over time. MilborneOne may be the creator but he is not the COI I am referring to. I was hoping those replying to this AfD would do some due dilligence on ALL contributors. Thank you. LukeWWF (talk) 21:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.