User talk:10mmsocket: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:49, 18 September 2021

This is 10mmsocket's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 7 days

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

MicroImages, Inc.

This article has concerned me for some time, and you reminded me today via your prod to look into it again. There's further related articles all linked to the parent you've prodded, being TNTmips and TNTlite. I suspect all 3 of them are long standing non-notable spam. I've listed the latter 2 at AfD. -- Longhair\^talk 09:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take a look at the two AfD's and support as appropriate. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu Diet

Please be more specific concerning the WP:NOR you claim I inserted ? thanks BLPcleaner (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note

How come you did not look at the source I wrote in the edit?

http://todor66.com/

http://todor66.com/volleyball/Asia/index_Men.html

http://todor66.com/handball/Asia/index_Women.html

also see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Routine_calculations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungary_men%27s_national_handball_team#Competitive_record

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatma Ataallah (talk • contribs) 15:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Routine arithmetic is fine - but only when there are sources for the data. You just added what could be random data and large empty tables to articles? You are clearly an experienced editor with a newly-registered account so you must understand the need to provide reliable sourced WP:RS, not blogs or fansites. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources should be properly referenced, not just added into an article as a bare URL or added as part of the edit summary. They must be part of the content. Futhermore sources should be reliable WP:RS. todor66.com is a fansite written by an individual, not a noted authority, not a noted publication, not an official source such as a sports authority. It's just stuff added onto the Internet by some well-meaning enthusiast. --10mmsocket (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dear user , This site is the largest site for team sports results. I saw that it was also used in dozens of Wikipedia articles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Asian_Men%27s_Volleyball_Championship

See the source of this article. This is the only site in the whole web that has old and valid results of team disciplines. How do you claim it is not valid? There is no other resource in the entire web space.

Revision as of 14:48, 18 September 2021 edit Fatma Ataallah (talk \| contribs) 146 edits →Note ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:49, 18 September 2021 edit undo Fatma Ataallah (talk \| contribs) 146 edits →Note Next edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:

	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Asian_Men%27s_Volleyball_Championship		https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Asian_Men%27s_Volleyball_Championship

			See the source of this article. This is the only site in the whole web that has old and valid results of team disciplines. How do you claim it is not valid? There is no other resource in the entire web space.