Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Collisson (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Creating deletion discussion page for Nancy Collisson. |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:{{la|1=Nancy Collisson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Collisson (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 22#{{anchorencode:Nancy Collisson}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
:{{la|1=Nancy Collisson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Collisson (2nd nomination)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 22#{{anchorencode:Nancy Collisson}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nancy Collisson}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nancy Collisson}}) |
||
[[WP:BLP]] of a writer, not making or [[WP:RS|reliably sourcing]] any strong claim to passing our inclusion standards for writers. The notability claim on offer here is that she and her work exist, with no indication of the distinctions (literary awards, significant reliable source coverage analyzing the significance of her work, etc.) that it takes to turn existence into notability -- the closest thing there was here, until I stripped it as a violation of [[WP:ELNO]], was a handful of direct offsite links to online bookstores or web-published copies of her own work -- and while there have been additional footnotes here in the past that were recently removed by an editor claiming to be the subject herself, they were still just of the "her own work cited as proof of its own existence" variety rather than notability-building third party media coverage ''about'' her or her work.<br>The only reason I'm not just immediately speedying this is because it's been around |
[[WP:BLP]] of a writer, not making or [[WP:RS|reliably sourcing]] any strong claim to passing our inclusion standards for writers. The notability claim on offer here is that she and her work exist, with no indication of the distinctions (literary awards, significant reliable source coverage analyzing the significance of her work, etc.) that it takes to turn existence into notability -- the closest thing there was here, until I stripped it as a violation of [[WP:ELNO]], was a handful of direct offsite links to online bookstores or web-published copies of her own work -- and while there have been additional footnotes here in the past that were recently removed by an editor claiming to be the subject herself, they were still just of the "her own work cited as proof of its own existence" variety rather than notability-building third party media coverage ''about'' her or her work.<br>The only reason I'm not just immediately speedying this is because it's been around (without ''ever'' having been ''properly'' referenced) since 2006. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 18:26, 22 September 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nancy Collisson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a writer, not making or reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing our inclusion standards for writers. The notability claim on offer here is that she and her work exist, with no indication of the distinctions (literary awards, significant reliable source coverage analyzing the significance of her work, etc.) that it takes to turn existence into notability -- the closest thing there was here, until I stripped it as a violation of WP:ELNO, was a handful of direct offsite links to online bookstores or web-published copies of her own work -- and while there have been additional footnotes here in the past that were recently removed by an editor claiming to be the subject herself, they were still just of the "her own work cited as proof of its own existence" variety rather than notability-building third party media coverage about her or her work.
The only reason I'm not just immediately speedying this is because it's been around (without ever having been properly referenced) since 2006. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)