Jump to content

User talk:Serols: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 3 discussions to User talk:Serols/Archive 22. (BOT)
Line 113: Line 113:
::Thank you. Appreciated. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
::Thank you. Appreciated. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
::Your attention to [[Talk:Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service]] and the recent article history would be welcomed. Thanks. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 17:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
::Your attention to [[Talk:Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service]] and the recent article history would be welcomed. Thanks. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 17:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

== [[Sabel Starr]] ==

You reverted an inappropriate IP edit concerning her non-notable sister Corel Shields. The IP went to the Help Desk to complain and mentioned that [[Intelius]] could confirm that Shields was born in 1955 not 1959. I would not use Intelius or other public records sources as a reference in a Wikipedia article but I think it is a useful tool for investigating BLP concerns. Intelius says that she is 65 years old which is consistent with the IP's claim and therefore she was probably not born in 1959 and was much older than the claimed age of 13 at the time of an alleged 1973 sexual encounter with [[Iggy Pop]]. There is obviously a big difference between a rock star having sex with a 13 year old as opposed to a 17 or 18 year old, and there are major BLP concerns since both are still alive. Accordingly, I have removed all mention of Corel Shields from her sister's biography. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 18:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

:Hello [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]], thank you very much for your explanation. Wish you a nice day --[[User:Serols|Serols]] ([[User talk:Serols#top|talk]]) 13:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

== Sara Ramirez ==

So I updated the infobox image of Sara Ramirez because 1) having an outdated image of a person on their wikipage is annoying and 2) I know when I look back at photos of me from before my gender identity change I feel dysphoric and maybe that's not the case for Sara, we may never know, but I think the main photos on information pages should reflect their current appearance.

You reverted this change claiming it "did not appear constructive" but keeping images of people up to date is good practice and it seems to me like you only reverted this change due bigotry.

Maybe an updated image isn't as important as listing everything they've been in and new information about the person in question, but not changing it seems lazy at best and offensive at worst. Maybe not all images need to be updated if the person looks basically the same but when there's a huge difference in appearance due to age or gender etc it's important.

Sara Ramirez's page isn't the only one that needs to be updated. Elliot Page's Page is another and there's probably a lot more that I haven't seen. [[User:TransDragon|TransDragon]] ([[User talk:TransDragon|talk]]) 12:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

:Hello [[User:TransDragon|TransDragon]], please note [[Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names]]. To change the picture is ok, but you also changed the spelling of the name. Regards --[[User:Serols|Serols]] ([[User talk:Serols#top|talk]]) 13:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Since I clearly don't know much about editing Wikipedia maybe you could change the image for me? The image I used is called MAD-ramirez-501i.jpg
It's still in my uploads so I assume that means it's acceptable to use? I don't know. [[User:TransDragon|TransDragon]] ([[User talk:TransDragon|talk]]) 13:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

:Hello [[User:TransDragon|TransDragon]], see [[Sara_Ramirez|here]]. Regards --[[User:Serols|Serols]] ([[User talk:Serols#top|talk]]) 14:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

== A Barnstar for You! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I am Impressed of how quickly you fight Vandalism as you did on [[Nick DiGiovanni]]. Great Job! [[User:Brascoian|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">Brascoian</span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:Brascoian|<sup><i><span style="color:#228B22">'''(talk to me)'''</span></i></sup>]] 11:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
|}


== Mohammad ibn abd al wahab ==
== Mohammad ibn abd al wahab ==

Revision as of 22:19, 24 September 2021


A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your work in fighting vandalism. Shinyeditbonjour. 17:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for protecting my user page. Hatchens (talk) 04:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I often see you around combating vandalism. This is to let you know that your work is much appreciated. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 15:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You literally inspired me to become an active contributor here Firestar464 (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
We deleted this article together :) Justiyaya (talk) 08:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Since you done very well on a rollbacker. I will give you a barnstar award. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 15:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Speedy reverts, thanks Serols. Justiyaya (talk) 14:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Not bad. Not bad at all.
Littlecat456💬(.log) 12:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Ty for your efforts in anti-vandalism and WP in general! Necctaylor (chat) 15:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Sorry for reverting your edit, I was using an anti-vandalism tool that updated the page without me noticing. I was trying to revert vandalism. I immediately undid my rollback. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 12:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Qwerfjkl, please be careful with what you do. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your sterling anti-vandalism work. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 12:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service‎

Thanks for the revert. I would appreciate you keeping an eye on the article for a while as (along with other UK fire and rescue articles) it tends to attract single-purpose COI and / or IP editors who seem hell-bent on filling it with unsourced trivia and original research. As someone who is passionate about removing OR from Wikipedia I defend articles, but I do obviously want to stay within the rules and not inadvertently trip 3RR. Hence the request for you to keep watch if you don't mind. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 10mmsocket, I pay attention too. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Appreciated. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your attention to Talk:Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service and the recent article history would be welcomed. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad ibn abd al wahab

Hey why did you change my edit Khan12888 (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khan12888, you know why. Please stop with vandalism, you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry bro i am experimenting and I am not vanadilizing, I am new and can you let me from where you are kind of you Khan12888 (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khan12888, please stop it. --Serols (talk) 08:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I got it but you don't tell me from where you are are you muslim? Khan12888 (talk) 08:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is over. --Serols (talk) 08:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm Khan12888 (talk) 08:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome template

Will you give me one of those welcome templates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GBFEE (talkcontribs) 17:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GBFEE, I sent you. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

slow-motion edit war continues at Andrea Radrizzani

Hi, I see you were once involved in the article on Andrea Radrizzani, which was protected at some time (were you the protecting admin?). Its history is just a huge string of edits and reverts by a handful of IPs adding and removing a reference to U.S Salernitana. The current warring parties are [2001:b07:6461:5805:9daf:f435:c567:7828] and [82.49.175.253]. I wonder whether this page needs protection again? Elemimele (talk) 12:24, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elemimele, I did not protect them, only reported them to protect them. I have reported an article again - see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Sorry to have made you extra work; I am still rather new and didn't think of putting the request at that page myself! Elemimele (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Elemimele, no problem, I was happy to do that. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I've lost count of how many times I've seen your name on my watchlist with regards to fighting vandalism. Thank you for all your hard work in this area. Nice one! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

As to this -- https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=United%20Nations%20Office%20for%20Partnerships&diff=1032728206

Can you please explain the reason for your revert? --2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why did you delete whole sections? --Serols (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. It has been uncited for a long time. Over half a decade. Tagged for over a year - as I very clearly stated in my edit summaries. There is no special protection from deletion an editor receives, by adding a whole section of uncited material - rather than just half a section. And tagged for that malady. Why do you restore uncited material without RS refs? Isn't there a rule against it?
Can you please explain the reason for your revert?2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 08:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you delete it without specifying the source. Please use the talk page beforehand. --Serols (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Specifying what source? What do you mean? 2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 08:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, a source that justifies the deletion, or use the talk page. --Serols (talk) 08:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is no rule that talk page discussion is required first, especially for uncited for half a decade, tagged for a decade, material. I supplied three proper edit summaries - that is what is called for. Nothing more.

There is however a rule that applies directly to what you did, which is not OK. You are not supposed to re-add the uncited text once challenged and deleted, without you shouldering your burden of providing the supporting RS refs. I would refer you to wp:burden. Which states:

"All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who ... restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution ... The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article... Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source."

That's the main issue, and quite clear. I might add - you used tools, which is really not cricket, in making this mistake. And further - you failed to provide (not that there was one, I guess) a legitimate edit summary for your edit. I would also note that I asked you a question twice above, and you only answered with questions - Can you please explain the reason, per wp rules, for your revert? 2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the sections that you have deleted are not wrong, it is just that no corresponding sources have been stored. The right way would have been to point this out on the talk page.
Example -> (see General Assembly resolution 60/1) - 1 and 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 2. The sections were never questioned, only marked that the sources were missing. You are welcome to edit that accordingly and everything is ok. Is that cleared up? --Serols (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry. You are wrong. I left a proper edit summary. Material was tagged. It was deleted properly - in addition to the tag, I question and delete the material. You restored it. Without sources. Clearly failing your obligation under wp:burden. I will therefore restore the deletion.2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Mean as custard may have thoughts on this thread. 2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, that is so is not correct and falsified. Writing d per year old tags in the comment line is not an acceptable edit summary. The quality templates were set in order to motivate users to insert the missing sources and not to delete whole sections, this is destructive. I gave you two examples, which I then inserted in a section that you deleted. Maybe you will think about this in the future before you start deleting thousands of kb again. --Serols (talk) 07:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar!

The Recent Changes Barnstar
cheers for the slightly speedier vandal reversion!   melecie   t 08:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sayaun Thunga Phulka

Not vandalism. See MOS:TITLE, MOS:FLAG, MOS:COLOR, WP:OVERLINK, MOS:PRONUNCIATION. 134.195.198.252 (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names and use sources, you risk to block. --Serols (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Serols, it looks like this might be getting a bit heated. To avoid an edit war it might be a good idea to step back and discuss things on the relevant talk page or pages, and maybe get a WP:Third opinion if you can't agree. You might also be able to informally ask for help from editors experienced in the subject area, such as prior editors of the page or participants in relevant WikiProjects such as WP:WikiProject Nepal, WP:WikiProject Music, or WP:WikiProject Songs.
As a copyeditor I have a few thoughts related to the WP:Manual of Style:
  • I can attest that "Shreeman Gambhir" should be in double quotation marks rather than italics following MOS:TITLE for titles of songs, e.g. "The Star-Spangled Banner".
  • Nepal seems to commonly use DMY dates and had associations with the British Empire, so it's possible DMY dates would be better per MOS:DATETIES.
I unfortunately am not familiar with the other matters. I'm not really an expert on Wikipedia policies and guidelines either; I'm mostly just summarizing WP:Dispute Resolution. I hope you can settle it peacefully. – Anon423 (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized you have a ton of experience. No insult was intended by linking Wikipedia basics for reference. Maybe it'll help the other editor. – Anon423 (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Anon423, I don't know what you want from me. The article name is Sayaun Thunga Phulka and not Sayaũ Thuṅgā Phūlkā. Hence my reference to the Wikipedia rule -> Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Something else was not objectionable. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't even read what I added, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???

You don't even read what I added, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??? I made a lot of great work on chen yifa

Hello, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. --Serols (talk) 14:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for continuously stopping so much vandalism! Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Tony Slydini

Hello, I am MagicianLives291. I have tried to change the birth date of Tony Slydini from 1901 to 1900. See video by Bill Wisch located here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujHm0hNYAD0&ab_channel=BillWisch It clearly shows the birth year is wrong. He was 90 years old when he died, not 89 as the article states. Also, Slydini was buried in Union, NJ not Orange, NJ as stated. This is explained in Bill's description of his Youtube video at Slydini's crypt.

It reads: Tony Slydini was more than a mentor and teacher to me; he was also my good friend. Upon learning that Slydini is featured on the cover of the August 2021 issue of Genii, I thought it would be a great time to visit Slydini's final resting place and make a video paying tribute to him. Apparently not many people know where his final resting place is as the burial ceremony was very private and only a few magicians attended, including Artie Miller and Gene Matsuura.

If you would like to pay your respects to Slydini in person, his final resting place is located at: Hollywood Memorial Park and Cemetery 1500 Stuyvesant Ave. Union, NJ 07083 Mausoleum of the Good Shepherd D Chapel-Unit B-Row 3 908-688-4300


Please revert changes back or advise on how to proceed to update Slydini's wikipedia article to state his true birth year, burial location and age upon death. Thank you.


Hello MagicianLives291, please use reliable sources, YouTube does not belong to it. In the Google search is the birth year 1901. --Serols (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have now updated references with the Genii Forum.... there is no better source. This includes a PHOTO OF THE GRAVESITE. This should NOT be changed back.... I have provided undeniable proof that Slydini was born in 1900 NOT 1901. Thank you. Genii forum post located here: (WITH PHOTO OF GRAVESITE): https://forums.geniimagazine.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53599
Hello MagicianLives291, this source is ok. --Serols (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These things happen

Not a problem; thanks for fixing it. Yappy2bhere (talk) 21:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Even though official Church communications will often transliterate the bishop's name from Ukrainian (i.e. "Venedykt"),[1] his eparchy's offical style is to translate his name into English (i.e. "Benedict")[2], he also self-signs official documents with the "Benedict" nomenclature.[3] I think the Wiki should reflect his personal style and his eparchy's style. julianhayda (talk) 4 August July 2021

Hello julianhayda, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names, thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello i'm </MrDDBOI>

thanks for you help and i hope many should procces more with guide on via any desk [4]mMrDDBOI (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
You are at the forefront of keeping Wikipedia vandalism free, Good luck 😊 ~ Itsskv08 (Talk) 14:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consultation

What did I do now? Please explain to me. I don't get your point. Philippine 454 Papa (talk) 07:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Philippine 454 Papa, article name is Honcho and you wrote image caption Bosx1ne. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. But that was his previous name. Anyway, this is noted. Thanks! Philippine 454 Papa (talk) 07:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reza Abbaszadeh

Sir, I recently join Simple English wikipedia. Where I found Reza Abbaszadeh. Then I came to english Wikipedia. I do research for an hour and found he write huge amount of wrong info and submitted paid news as he want. Beside some news media I found he donated 1 million dollar. how could he do having net asset of 12 Million dollar. Again it also be check in world Millionaire list and Abbaszadeh University

where you can see  a University map location have only 11 reviews in past 11 month ago all are same time. Even he uses US number for German Located University. Even the University has no website also.

For spreading this false he targetted the indian and nigerian paid news agency and some pr distribution. Like he feautured in forbesIndia.com but not in Forbes.com.

So please check and delete this false news

Hello, whith other such edits you risk your account 1 2. --Serols (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Virginia Giuffre Article

Reference your comment upon my page, there is nothing controversial about including original comments by Virgini Giuffre which come from a reliable source known as courthousenews and indeed from the original court documents. You also do to threaten an individual with a ban for including material which you do not happen to like.

Hello, please use upper and lower case. --Serols (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for stopping vandals, and warning users for hours, you deserve this. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 13:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what is your problem ????

what is your problem ???? 1) Nusret is not Turkish. 2) a photo of a Kurdish dagger, the so-called ottoman knife. BERKİYA (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BERKİYA , please stop with vandalism. With edits like this you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 15:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jnana Yagnas edit to Tejomayananda and Chinmayananda Saraswati

I added this link as an explanation of Jnana Yagna and NOT as promotional material. I am not affiliated with https://chinmaya-sacramento.org/jnana-yagnas

Jnana Yagna is a very technical Sanskrit term and wanted to provide a reference to the same. Upon duckduckgo search you find that this is the first link that pops up with the most reasonable explanation of the term (please read through the link, no promotion involved on the page to the best of my reading) Emvy20 (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if you have a better reference for Jnana Yagna I am happy to oblige! Bottomline it helps to provide a link to Jnana Yagna as it is a very technical term. Thank you Emvy20 (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emvy20, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks. --Serols (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see the weblinks you sent but am missing the point of them. Are you implying they apply as references to help the term "Jnana Yagna"? Emvy20 (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emvy20, from here Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. --Serols (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Serols! this is helpful. The link added does NOT fall into the criteria of links to be avoided. Furthermore the link is from Chinmaya mission branch of Sacramento and actually Swami Chinmayananda and Tejomayananda are from this organization. So essentially the weblink falls in this category: "link to an official page of the article's subject". Hope this clarifies that this not a spam or a promotional edit. Happy to answer any other questions you may have! Emvy20 (talk) 18:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emvy20, please read also -> no links in the flowtext. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I noticed you deleted my edits, so please add a external reference (as opposed to weblink) to the Jnana Yagna term yourself. It tremendously helps improve both the pages. Thank you.

Warning

Hi @Serols:, Recently, you had warned the user Cookallstar by Vandalism2 as He/She did it on Abhinaya (actress). Please give me reason for this warning. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fade258, because of this edit. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Serols But i didn't see any offensive word. In my point of view, this would be NPOV issue as the editor had present their thought. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Fade258, the edit is absolute nonsense. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. --Serols (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Serols, Yes, I know if this is not an NPOV issue then How we can find NPOV issue in BLP. Fade258 (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Hi @Serols, this World Youth Archery Championships page needs to be renamed to World Archery Youth Championships. This is how the event is called.

Why are you stating Robert Rusler is openly bisexual?

Why are you stating Robert Rusler is openly bisexual? Just because his Facebook states he’s interested in men and women doesn’t mean he’s openly bisexual. It could be a mistake, or something we’re not privy too. I don’t think it’s wise to state he’s openly bisexual when there is no proof as that could be Libel. Please leave your reasoning on the talk page for Robert Rusler. Thank you. 107.3.228.215 (talk) 17:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 107.3.228.215, I reverted your edit because you have problems with spelling 1. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dear,

you are unhinged if you think that was an act of anti-vandalism. what a bizarre instance of institutional capture on this ridiculous website.

Conforth

I've raised the current problem at WP:BLPN, but you may think of a better approach. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ghmyrtle, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my edits were constructive

stop Nickioutsold (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nickioutsold, I have a different opinion, see article name and here. --Serols (talk) 09:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And now you lost your account. --Serols (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed non-working archiving settings

Hi! I took the liberty of removing the (not in use) auto-archiving settings for User:Lowercase sigmabot III at the top of this page, since it looks like User:ClueBot III is doing the archiving. I've left that configuration in place. --rchard2scout (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello rchard2scout, thank you for the information, that fits. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help

Hello Serols:

I'm sending you this message because I need your help. I noticed that you fixed the erroneous edits of an anonymous user in the article called "Carme Forcadell". That user had changed Carme Forcadell's nationality from "Spanish" to "Catalan" and you corrected it.

That is why I ask for your help, because I have found the same problem in other articles: I corrected the nationality of other politicians who are also from Catalonia but my edits were reversed by another user. I ask you, please, to correct those nationality errors for me. I prefer not to do it again because I am concerned that if I insist my edits could be considered arbitrary.

The articles with that problem are as follows:

-Roger Torrent -Lluís Corominas -Joan Ignasi Elena -Laura Vilagrà -Violant Cervera -Gemma Geis i Carreras -Josep Bargalló -Elsa Artadi

Thank you Aziyade Gil (talk) 06:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The same problem again

Hello Serols:

Forgive me for bothering you again. But I have had the same problem as before with the "Spanish-Catalan" theme. This time it was in the article called "Antoni Gaudí". This time another user reversed my edit and it wasn't just that: the explanation he gave was that my edit was vandalism.

I don't understand why my edit was deemed vandalism!

I do not like to be arrogant, even I consider that I am still a user who has a lot to learn, but I do not understand why others revert an edition that is correct.

Please could you help me again?

Thanks Aziyade Gil (talk) 18:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, Antoni Gaudí is a special case, see the article talk page Talk:Antoni_Gaudí. Unfortunately, I can not help. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Obi2canibe

Hello, Serols. You have new messages at Obi2canibe's talk page.
Message added 14:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Obi2canibe (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for editing out/reverting information on the Mangal tribe. The majority of the Mangals have always remained neutral in recent years and do not have any affiliation to any millitant groups. Wiki-wizard80s (talk) 17:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your anti-vandalism work (for some reason I thought you were an admin but it appears you are not). ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#0001 15:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already found the person who can help us with the problem of "Spanish-Catalan"

Hello Serols:

I have good news for you: I noticed that in the edit history of the article called Carme Forcadell another user had previously corrected an edit by someone who had made the same mistake that you corrected: the error of "Catalan" instead of "Spanish". That user is called Crystallizedcarbon and he is Spanish. He had a conversation with the user who had written "Catalan" and gave him good arguments to explain why the article should say "Spanish politician from Catalonia".

I think he is the ideal person to ask for help and a third opinion about that problem. I think that with him we will solve the problem.

Here is the link to the discussion page of the user Crystallizedcarbon and the conversation with the arguments that he gave to the other user.

Greetings

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Crystallizedcarbon#Catalan_vs_Spanish_in_lead Aziyade Gil (talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iván Zarco

Hi @Serols:, you just reverted an IP edit at Iván Zarco, where the IP editor left an edit summary in Spanish. This is what it said via Google Translate: "There is bogus content in that text that I have deleted. I am Ivan Zarco, if you put the text again I will proceed to report you for false content that is causing family problems for publishing something totally false" This is obviously problematic because it shows a potential CoI (assuming the IP really is the person), as well as what verges on a threat. Given that the editor assumes we understand Spanish, it may be fairly futile posting an explanation in English on a talk-page they may not even find, but who knows? I leave it to your discretion. Elemimele (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elemimele, thank you for the information. Such threats come more often. Have a nice weekend --Serols (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kumagai Gumi

[1] May I know why the SCMP link and Plover Cove would have to be deleted? 203.145.94.110 (talk) 18:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Hey what'd happened? Is there anything that's misunderstood? 203.145.94.110 (talk) 18:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]