Talk:Commander of the Iranian Navy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:52, 10 February 2022

Military history: Maritime / Middle East Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Iran List‑class Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent changes

@Pahlevun: I'm not understanding your changes. Interwiki links are perfectly fine, there is no policy against them (otherwise, they wouldn't be allowed). They also help if readers want to know about someone, when an English article isn't present. It is miles better than just redlinks, which offers no information at all. Fars News Agency described as a "semi-official" news agency of the Government, why would that be a bad source for information concerning changes made by the government? Why are you removing the native name from the native parameter in the infobox? Skjoldbro (talk) 11:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Skjoldbro: Fars News Agency is notorious for publishing falsehoods and is not a good sources when you can easily find a better source in English. There has been a recent trend in English Wikipedia to use sources like that, which is awful. Wikipedia:Red link encourage users to create articles while many of articles on the Persian project are flawed machine translations from articles on English Wikipedia. I do not recommend linking to a wiki full of low-quality content at all. Pahlevun (talk) 11:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun: Do you believe that the presence of an interwiki link encourages/discourages creating articles more or less than a normal red link? While there may be translation problems, I still believe that general information can be interpreted. Additionally, his particular pages seems to be reasonably sourced. I don't see anything on wiki that states it problematic (apart from your own statements). I have however changed it. Skjoldbro (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Skjoldbro: Excuse me, I didn't notice that the redlink was still present. Iranian military articles on English Wikipedia are prone to usage of poor sources (see List of equipment of the Iranian Army for example). Frankly speaking, it is very disappointing to see the information that you have took the time to find on a reliable publication (such as the IISS), is being repeatedly vandalized with links to sources like a Persian-language forum (I'm talking about Iranian military articles in general, not this specific case), so I was over-sensitive in that edit and I apologize. Pahlevun (talk) 12:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

دریادار کوچکی.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ::{{re|Pahlevun}} Do you believe that the presence of an interwiki link encourages/discourages creating articles more or less than a normal red link? While there may be translation problems, I still believe that general information can be interpreted. Additionally, his particular pages seems to be reasonably sourced. I don't see anything on wiki that states it problematic (apart from your own statements). I have however changed it. [[User:Skjoldbro|Skjoldbro]] ([[User talk:Skjoldbro|talk]]) 12:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 :::{{ping|Skjoldbro}} Excuse me, I didn't notice that the redlink was still present. Iranian military articles on English Wikipedia are prone to usage of poor sources (see [[List of equipment of the Iranian Army]] for example). Frankly speaking, it is very disappointing to see the information that you have took the time to find on a reliable publication (such as the IISS), is being repeatedly vandalized with links to sources like a Persian-language forum (I'm talking about Iranian military articles in general, not this specific case), so I was over-sensitive in that edit and I apologize. [[User:Pahlevun|Pahlevun]] ([[User talk:Pahlevun|talk]]) 12:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
+== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion ==
+The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
+* [[commons:File:دریادار کوچکی.jpg|دریادار کوچکی.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2022-02-10T18:52:11.932881 | دریادار کوچکی.jpg -->
+You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 18:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)