Constrained equal awards: Difference between revisions
Erel Segal (talk | contribs) |
Erel Segal (talk | contribs) removed Category:Division rules for bankruptcy problems; added Category:Bankruptcy theory using HotCat |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Bankruptcy theory]] |
Revision as of 17:10, 2 October 2021
Constrained equal awards (CEA), also called constrained equal gains, is a division rule for solving bankruptcy problems. According to this rule, each claimant should receive an equal amount, except that no claimant should receive more than his/her claim. In the context of taxation, it is known as leveling tax.[1]
Formal definition
There is a certain amount of money to divide, denoted by (=Estate or Endowment). There are n claimants. Each claimant i has a claim denoted by . Usually, , that is, the estate is insufficient to satisfy all the claims.
The CEA rule says that each claimant i should receive , where r is a constant chosen such that . The rule can also be described algorithmically as follows:
- Initially, all agents are active, and all agents get 0.
- While there are remaining units of the estate:
- The next estate unit is divided equally among all active agents.
- Each agent whose total allocation equals its claim becomes inactive.
Examples
Examples with two claimants:
- ; here . In general, when all claims are at least , each claimant receives exactly .
- ; here .
Examples with three claimants:
- ; here .
- ; here .
- ; here .
Characterizations
The CEA rule has several characterizations. It is the only rule satisfying the following sets of axioms:
- Equal treatment of equals, invariance under truncation of claims, and composition up;[2]
- Conditional full compensation, and composition down;[3]
- Conditional full compensation, and claims-monotonicity.[4]
Dual rule
The constrained equal losses (CEL) rule is the dual of the CEA rule, that is: for each problem , we have .
References
- ^ William, Thomson (2003-07-01). "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey". Mathematical Social Sciences. 45 (3): 249–297. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00070-7. ISSN 0165-4896.
- ^ Dagan, Nir (1996-01-01). "New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules". Social Choice and Welfare. 13 (1): 51–59. doi:10.1007/BF00179098. ISSN 1432-217X.
- ^ Herrero, Carmen; Villar, Antonio (2002-12-01). "Sustainability in bankruptcy problems". Top. 10 (2): 261–273. doi:10.1007/BF02579019. ISSN 1863-8279.
- ^ C-H Yeh, 2001, "Sustainability, claims monotonicity, and the constrained equal award rule", Mimeo.