Jump to content

Constrained equal awards: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 35: Line 35:
== References ==
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Division rules for bankruptcy problems]]
[[Category:Bankruptcy theory]]

Revision as of 17:10, 2 October 2021

Constrained equal awards (CEA), also called constrained equal gains, is a division rule for solving bankruptcy problems. According to this rule, each claimant should receive an equal amount, except that no claimant should receive more than his/her claim. In the context of taxation, it is known as leveling tax.[1]

Formal definition

There is a certain amount of money to divide, denoted by (=Estate or Endowment). There are n claimants. Each claimant i has a claim denoted by . Usually, , that is, the estate is insufficient to satisfy all the claims.

The CEA rule says that each claimant i should receive , where r is a constant chosen such that . The rule can also be described algorithmically as follows:

  • Initially, all agents are active, and all agents get 0.
  • While there are remaining units of the estate:
    • The next estate unit is divided equally among all active agents.
    • Each agent whose total allocation equals its claim becomes inactive.

Examples

Examples with two claimants:

  • ; here . In general, when all claims are at least , each claimant receives exactly .
  • ; here .

Examples with three claimants:

  • ; here .
  • ; here .
  • ; here .

Characterizations

The CEA rule has several characterizations. It is the only rule satisfying the following sets of axioms:

  • Equal treatment of equals, invariance under truncation of claims, and composition up;[2]
  • Conditional full compensation, and composition down;[3]
  • Conditional full compensation, and claims-monotonicity.[4]

Dual rule

The constrained equal losses (CEL) rule is the dual of the CEA rule, that is: for each problem , we have .

References

  1. ^ William, Thomson (2003-07-01). "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey". Mathematical Social Sciences. 45 (3): 249–297. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00070-7. ISSN 0165-4896.
  2. ^ Dagan, Nir (1996-01-01). "New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules". Social Choice and Welfare. 13 (1): 51–59. doi:10.1007/BF00179098. ISSN 1432-217X.
  3. ^ Herrero, Carmen; Villar, Antonio (2002-12-01). "Sustainability in bankruptcy problems". Top. 10 (2): 261–273. doi:10.1007/BF02579019. ISSN 1863-8279.
  4. ^ C-H Yeh, 2001, "Sustainability, claims monotonicity, and the constrained equal award rule", Mimeo.