User talk:James Allison/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
== UCLA US News ranking == |
== UCLA US News ranking == |
||
I am not what source you are looking at, but here is the url for the UCLA's US News ranking:[http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/los-angeles-ca/ucla-1315/@@Academics_overview.html]. Where are you getting that UCLA is ranked 16th?[[User:Amerique| Amerique]] |
I am not what source you are looking at, but here is the url for the UCLA's US News ranking:[http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/los-angeles-ca/ucla-1315/@@Academics_overview.html]. Where are you getting that UCLA is ranked 16th?[[User:Amerique| Amerique]]<small>[[User_talk:Amerique|<sup style="color:darkred;">dialectics</sup>]]</small> 02:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:That's strange. This is the source I've been using (it's the one linked to in the UCLA Wikipedia article): [http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/worlds-best-universities/2010/02/25/worlds-best-universities-top-400] --[[User:Torritorri|TorriTorri]]<sup>([[User talk:Torritorri|Talk to me!]])</sup> 03:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
:That's strange. This is the source I've been using (it's the one linked to in the UCLA Wikipedia article): [http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/worlds-best-universities/2010/02/25/worlds-best-universities-top-400] --[[User:Torritorri|TorriTorri]]<sup>([[User talk:Torritorri|Talk to me!]])</sup> 03:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::That ranking puts Stanford at 16th and UCLA at 32nd best in the world. UCLA is currently ranked 24th in the nation. The previous wording was correct.[[User:Amerique| Amerique]] |
::That ranking puts Stanford at 16th and UCLA at 32nd best in the world. UCLA is currently ranked 24th in the nation. The previous wording was correct.[[User:Amerique| Amerique]]<small>[[User_talk:Amerique|<sup style="color:darkred;">dialectics</sup>]]</small> 03:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Why is UCLA the 16th school from the US in the link I listed? --[[User:Torritorri|TorriTorri]]<sup>([[User talk:Torritorri|Talk to me!]])</sup> 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
:::Why is UCLA the 16th school from the US in the link I listed? --[[User:Torritorri|TorriTorri]]<sup>([[User talk:Torritorri|Talk to me!]])</sup> 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::Oh, so that's how you got UCLA at 16! I have no idea. The "world ranking" is probably based on some other survey statistics. Have no idea as to the metrical differences between the world ranking and the national ranking. [[User:Amerique| Amerique]] |
:::::Oh, so that's how you got UCLA at 16! I have no idea. The "world ranking" is probably based on some other survey statistics. Have no idea as to the metrical differences between the world ranking and the national ranking. [[User:Amerique| Amerique]]<small>[[User_talk:Amerique|<sup style="color:darkred;">dialectics</sup>]]</small> 03:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== ''The Wikipedia Signpost'': 5 April 2010 == |
== ''The Wikipedia Signpost'': 5 April 2010 == |
Revision as of 13:25, 21 October 2021
This is an archive of past discussions with User:James Allison. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!
You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.
Here are some helpful links:
- Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
- Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
- Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
- Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
- How to upload files and image copyright tags.
By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page :)Joe I 00:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Wow, cool! Thanks, Joe. btw, where did you get that template/coding/whatever the term is? --torritorri 02:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Your welcome. You can go to Wikipedia:Welcoming committee, Wikipedia:Welcome templates, Wikipedia:Standard user greeting, or Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. I use a new one now, you can see it here. Sorry it took so long for me to get back to ya, didn't notice. :) Anything else, feel free! Joe I 13:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Goclenius’s page
Dear Torritorri,
Actually the Style Guidelines category tag for my user page is a mistake. (I haven’t been using wikipedia very long either.) I was trying to link to Categories:Wikipedia Style Guidelines, rather than trying to put my page in that category. Using [[Category:Wikipedia_style_guidelines]] doesn’t work—it puts your page in the category.
Glad to see you're a grammar and French fan. I work on Descartes, Malebranche, and other French philosophers, and I read quite a bit of French literature, especially nineteenth century, but also recent authors like Raymond Queneau and Georges Perec.
Goclenius 02:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
The 4400
Good catch on the beam/ball of light thing. Thanks for fixing my mistake! Travisl 01:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Toa Mata
Actually, the name "Toa Mata" has been confirmed by Greg in the past day or two. I referenced the source in the Toa Mata/Toa Nuva article, but to clear up confusion I'll add it to the Characters and Toa articles as well. Drakhan 18:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
*doffs hat*
Ello there Torri.. Just wanted to greet you since I saw you along the Eureka (TV series) edits and you reminded me of another friend of mine who has the same exact first name and so forth. She's more into The Hitchhiker's Guide though. DrWho42 20:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Ellen G. White article
Thanks for helping out with cleanup. I have reverted the entire set of anonymous/PilgrimRoad contributions (along with minor edits in between) as they were Original research. However, in order to make it legitimate we must focus on referencing what is left so we do not have the same problem again. If you see any minor changes or substantiated changes that I reverted could you please re-insert them. Cheers, Ansell 02:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Just a comment about your vote. The main issue of contention isn't the i in iPod, but rather the n in nano. Apple says the n is to be lower cased as it is with all of their products and that's what the move is trying to do is put it at the proper name according to Apple which is "iPod nano". Currently it is residing at iPod Nano. Gateman1997 03:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Could you please review you vote on Talk:iPod Nano? You appear to be suggesting that the article belongs at "IPod Nano" instead of "IPod nano". AlistairMcMillan 20:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
A Series of Unfortunate Events
Join the Discussion!
Hello, James Allison/Archive 1! As you are a member of WP:ASUE, I hope you will join in the project discussions on the project talk page. The other members and I would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions.
Cheers, Clamster5 00:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Southern California
Hi. Welcome to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Southern California. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Since you are in the San Bernardino area, one thing I'll warn you about is a very slow Edit war over the inclusion/deletion of some information about gangs at San Bernardino County, California#Gang violence. IMHO, what is really needed is to create a better written, better referenced replacement for the section than what the one anon is trying to add. On the other hand, the two individuals in the edit war seem pretty committed to 'their' versions, so the odds are both of them will not like any changes to the section. ;-)
Since neither of the editors has created a user account, it might be necessary to get the page semi-protected for a little while to get them to quite edit warring and start discussing matters on the article's talk page. User:Will Beback is the most active administrator involved in Southern California articles, so you might contact him for help and advice. BlankVerse 15:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
ASUE December 2006 Newsletter
The A Series of Unfortunate Events WikiProject Newsletter | |
|
Welcome to the first issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. We would encourage all members to get more envolved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. Clamster5 18:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC) |
| |
| |
|
ASUE
Lemony Snicket Roll Call
First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject, or I happen to know personally).
I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.
If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!
If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.
Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 00:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi There!
It seems that you are intrested in San Bernardino and the Inland Empire (California) area. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Inland Empire and join if you like. It is a newly formed wikiproject that I just created so please cheak it out. Any questions contact me! Thank-You House1090 (talk) 04:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Inland Empire Template
I reverted you because the name is the same as other metro-area templates, they use the nickname. Ex: Template:Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, when the official name is LA-Long Beach-Santa Ana. Does that make sense? If not we can come to some compromise or something. House1090 (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Assuming she changed it to Template:Riverside-San Bernardino metropolitan area, it should stay that way. Let me explain. Lets use your example House. First of all the Template:Los Angeles metropolitan area uses it's core city as a name. The official name of the "Inland Empire" is Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario. Now if we take those core cities, RS & SB it would be Template:Riverside-San Bernardino metropolitan area. After all the Template:Los Angeles metropolitan area would be Template:Southland metropolitan area if we went by regional names. However this only applies to if she changed it to Template:Riverside-San Bernardino metropolitan area. Otherwise forgive my intrusion. SoCal L.A. (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I replaced "metropolitan area" with "region" but it's a moot point now anyway. Thanks =) --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 01:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should start using Template Talk:Inland Empire to discuss this. I replied there. Cheers! House1090 (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Links
When you changed Greater Los Angeles from a redirect into a disambiguation page, you seem to have overlooked the fact that over a hundred other Wikipedia articles contain links to "Greater Los Angeles". When you change the target of an existing page title, "it is strongly recommended that you modify all pages that link to the old title so they will link to the new title." --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Help requested
While revamping the Metrolink (Southern California) page, I moved some information on Metrolink's governing body, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority to its own page. I thought that the original version was a bit confusing for someone who was not familiar with Metrolink so I split up some information for the purpose of clarity and style.
Another editor, however, disagrees with my edits and we cannot seem to come to an agreement with how the information should be handled. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at our discussion here and offer a tiebreaking opinion. Many thanks! Butros (talk) 09:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Metro Expo Line
Please don't move pages around without discussing with others first. All LACMTA lines are using the Metro_Name_Line_(LACMTA) format. Esirgen (talk) 01:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Please see WP:BOLD. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 03:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
UCLA US News ranking
I am not what source you are looking at, but here is the url for the UCLA's US News ranking:[1]. Where are you getting that UCLA is ranked 16th? Ameriquedialectics 02:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- That's strange. This is the source I've been using (it's the one linked to in the UCLA Wikipedia article): [2] --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 03:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- That ranking puts Stanford at 16th and UCLA at 32nd best in the world. UCLA is currently ranked 24th in the nation. The previous wording was correct. Ameriquedialectics 03:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Why is UCLA the 16th school from the US in the link I listed? --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, so that's how you got UCLA at 16! I have no idea. The "world ranking" is probably based on some other survey statistics. Have no idea as to the metrical differences between the world ranking and the national ranking. Ameriquedialectics 03:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Why is UCLA the 16th school from the US in the link I listed? --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- That ranking puts Stanford at 16th and UCLA at 32nd best in the world. UCLA is currently ranked 24th in the nation. The previous wording was correct. Ameriquedialectics 03:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Content Edit Reasoning
Please in the future, if you're going to refer to someone's edit as vandalism, please provide a valid explanation. That's a serious accusation. Thank you for your time and contributions. Shyngo (talk) 07:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies. I will keep that in mind in the future. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 23:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formstack. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Edit Summary
I was going to revert your edit Here, for not using the edit summary to explain the edit to other editor's, what stopped me is that it was a good edit. In the future please try to remimber to use the Edit Summary so other editor's don't have to guess. Thank you Mlpearc MESSAGE 04:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Will do. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 04:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Paramore
I'd like you explain the following about the removal from the lead (figure I might as well give you the heads-up).
- I highly doubt that even lowercasing the whole title counts as a stylazation nor has it even ever been done before.
- There isn't even a source for the matter
- There isn't even supposed to be the certain different stylazation in parethesis in the lead, there's nothing at all notable about how the title for something would appear in funny spellings.
Furthermore if I could ask, be sure to refraim from making edits like this, they're supposed to be seperated in commas, breaks aren't supposed to be used that way ( see WP:ALBUM). • GunMetal Angel 07:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- I did not realise about the commas, thanks. However, for the stylization, here is a source, and MOS:TM states that " it is acceptable to use decorative characters the first time the trademark appears, but thereafter, an alternative that follows the standard rules of punctuation should be used". Examples [[Yellow Tail {wine}|here]], [[Skate (video game}|here]], here, and here. Cheers! --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 07:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Edits
- ive put this here and on my talkpage, although now i see this conversation already here i realise that i became subject to being accused without knowing it, you yourself even realised the problems with the edits. so heres my message, and since this is the second time someone has done this to me, im not happy at all: Im sorry if you took my edits the wrong way, but i reverted everything because the deletion of a list format made it look scruffy and unco-ordinated, ill admit that it was ignorance on my part that changed the genres, i didnt see that it was then alphabetical...sorry about that, but i put back in links and information they for no reason deleted and changed a title format to make it noticeable. even if their edits were in good faith, i dont see why im being accused of vandalism...--WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 12:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk • contribs)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Shenandoah Valley Academy
I just fixed that. I didn't realize it was on our website as well as on non-copyrighted promotional materials. I think I just fixed it so the copyright review will be unnecessary. (I got them off of a promotional brochure which specifically stated that it granted full rights to reproduce) PuEpTiA 21:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies for not noticing. I was just making sure you were aware of the issue. As they say, better to be safe than sorry. Cheers! --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 22:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Sent you a message...
I just left you a reply in both the college and academy templates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PuEpTiA (talk • contribs) 23:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Thank you for your edit to Cal Poly
I have been advocating what you did to the Cal Poly disambiguation page for some time now, but it would always erupt in an edit war. Thank you.--Marco Guzman, Jr (talk) 00:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Looks like an IP has problems with it though. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 20:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I just bought a brand new flak jacket as my old one got trashed :-) Thank's for the help though--Marco Guzman, Jr (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
DLR
I just closed {{DLR}}
and noticed that {{DLRP}}
and {{DWR}}
are basically the same thing, but for Paris and Disney World. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Also, see
{{TDR}}
and{{HKDL}}
. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
"the love of FSM"
I assume you are a Pastafarian? LOL! Jubilee♫clipman 16:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, if I had to choose a label, I'd say the closest would be apatheism, or, as I like to call it, I-don't-give-a-fuck-ism. But the concept of the FSM is always fun. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 20:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I tend to vote Pajama Party myself—which might explain why my country has a hung parliament... See you around! --Jubilee♫clipman 21:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Inland Empire 'recent revert'
I reverted you recently to tell you my explanation ,which you can see on the edit summary. Please write your thoughts here, I'm open to a compromise. House1090 (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm curious. Why is it not a main article? --Stepheng3 (talk) 01:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- IMO, a "main article" actually discusses the topic that the category covers, e.g., something like Universities and colleges in California. If anything, Education in California is more of a main article for that category. Perhaps the list article can be included in some kind of "see also" template? --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 01:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- My thought is that substantive material on the topic is likely to show up in the list, not Education in California, but I might be wrong. I haven't found any guidelines on how to determine the main article. Even without the catmain template, the list is prominent, so I'm not going to sweat the issue. Cheers, --Stepheng3 (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've added both the list and education article with {{See also}}. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 17:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- My thought is that substantive material on the topic is likely to show up in the list, not Education in California, but I might be wrong. I haven't found any guidelines on how to determine the main article. Even without the catmain template, the list is prominent, so I'm not going to sweat the issue. Cheers, --Stepheng3 (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
I {{prod2}}ed it. There are a whole bunch of other "Westwood College programname" pages. If the School of Design PROD gets contested and you take it to AfD, may as well nom the lot of them (and let me know too...looks like they are all similarly poor). DMacks (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I see you found them too. Stupid WP database lag, wasn't showing me those edits a minute ago. DMacks (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was cleaning up Category:Universities and colleges in California and happened to stumble upon these. Thanks for letting me know --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 21:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Old Truronians
Please reconsider this undiscussed move to a title that is not in British English, and is not consistent with the category name. DuncanHill (talk) 23:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- I apologise for my unfamiliarity with British English, feel free to revert my edit. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 23:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting, decent of you and much appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 23:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Galaxy logo
What the hell are you doing? What possible reason could you have for wanting to delete a valid image that shows the historical progression of the corporate branding and imagery of a major sports franchise? You going to do the same thing with the Los Angeles Dodgers? --JonBroxton (talk) 05:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, and BTW, I didn't know the logo had been deleted. Had I known this was even being considered I would have fought against it. I thought it was a broken link, but when I couldn't find the original file I decided to upload a better version of it. --JonBroxton (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- WP:NFCC is very clear about logos. On a side note, the Dodgers logo is actually in the public domain. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 15:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- I just read WP:NFCC. I see nothing in there stating that the old Galaxy logo cannot be used in the way it is being used. --JonBroxton (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've taken the image to FfD, where the greater Wikipedia community can decide which action to take. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 16:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- WP:NFCC is very clear about logos. On a side note, the Dodgers logo is actually in the public domain. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 15:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Hayley Williams
If you read my comment I think you will find it was regarding adding a new section based upon info about her account recently being hacked. H644444 (talk) 06:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Populated places CfD question
I'm asking the people in the Consensus? section of the "Populated places" discussion about a key point that has created strong division in this giant nomination. When you were reaching this consensus, did you think the many "Cities and towns" categories (not "Cities, towns, and villages") should have been part of the changes? If you have an opinion on this, please comment at the nomination.--Mike Selinker (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Your Metrolink category
A category you created(Category:Metrolink images) was recently tagged for deletion, because it's an empty category. Any objections? ----DanTD (talk) 02:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Nope. --TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 20:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Citrus Plaza
If you want Citrus Plaza to be categorized as a shopping center instead of a shopping mall, then you need to actually create an appropriate shopping centers category. An article is not allowed to sit in categories that don't already exist (i.e. ones whose category link is red when you look at the article), so whether it's the best category or not, the article has to stay in the "malls" category until you or someone else has actually created a "centers" category instead. Bearcat (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
A reply from a veteran editor to your baseless and self-serving accusations.
- First I would like to remind you that you must be very careful when you go around accusing veteran editors of wrong doing, which you seem to be implying with your accusations.
- Second. Is it that you really think that I did this, or is it that you can't possibly fathom the fact that there are others (quite a few by my count), who think that the portals are completly out of place?
- Third. As far as your baseless accusations go, I would not stoop to trying to hide my identity to try and remove a portal that is obviously in no way related to the articles subject. I would just do it right out in the open. Its fairly clear that these portals are misplaced and it seems that others agree.
- Fourth. How long do the two of you going to continue to hold this subject matter hostage? No one else seems to agree with any of this silliness, yet you still ignore the fact that Orange County is in no way related to the City of Los Angelas.--Jojhutton (talk) 23:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
- Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature
- Features and admins: This week's highlights
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
3-revert rule
You could clearly see that I never reverted anything 3 times if you looked at the messages. I added some details, made some corrections, and then a couple weeks later, re-added a section. MXVN (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Unexplained moves of LA pages
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Los Angeles#Unexplained moves of this page. Optigan13 (talk) 23:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) -Optigan13 (talk) 23:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Template:Formspring has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Please comment on File talk:North Strathfield Bank.JPG
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:North Strathfield Bank.JPG. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mythology
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mythology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Implementation Force (IFOR)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Implementation Force (IFOR). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Almoravid dynasty
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Almoravid dynasty. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 21:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Heterarchy
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Heterarchy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)