Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Anne Rothschild: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Comment''' I found references to two museum exhibits related to the dog: [https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/stories/titanic-dogs Titanic dogs] (National Museums Liverpool) and [https://www.today.com/money/remembering-12-dogs-aboard-titanic-707275 Remembering the 12 dogs aboard the Titanic] (Today, discussing an exhibit at Widener University Art Gallery, in Chester, Pennsylvania). [[User:Beccaynr|Beccaynr]] ([[User talk:Beccaynr|talk]]) 04:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I found references to two museum exhibits related to the dog: [https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/stories/titanic-dogs Titanic dogs] (National Museums Liverpool) and [https://www.today.com/money/remembering-12-dogs-aboard-titanic-707275 Remembering the 12 dogs aboard the Titanic] (Today, discussing an exhibit at Widener University Art Gallery, in Chester, Pennsylvania). [[User:Beccaynr|Beccaynr]] ([[User talk:Beccaynr|talk]]) 04:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
: I don't think that counts as in-depth coverage, as both mention her only in passing as the owner of the dog. In any case, these sources don't seem like enough to make an individual dog notable, let alone the owner of one of them. [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 10:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
: I don't think that counts as in-depth coverage, as both mention her only in passing as the owner of the dog. In any case, these sources don't seem like enough to make an individual dog notable, let alone the owner of one of them. [[User:AryKun|AryKun]] ([[User talk:AryKun|talk]]) 10:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
'''Delete'''does not meet [[WP:GNG]]--[[User:Rrmmll22|Rrmmll22]] ([[User talk:Rrmmll22|talk]]) 00:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:47, 24 October 2021

Elizabeth Anne Rothschild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability beyond being one of the survivors of the Titanic, and apparently insisting that her dog be saved along with her. While it is an interesting tidbit, there are no reliable sources that establish any notability, and the subject does not pass WP:NBIO. AryKun (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, since I've been unable to make out any other conceivable claim to notability she might have, and what's there is obviously not enough. Also no objections to turning this into a redirect to Passengers of the Titanic, which already has a bunch of relatively random passenger names redirect to it, but I'm honestly fine with leaving it to whatever opinion the closer has of WP:CHEAP. AngryHarpytalk 10:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that counts as in-depth coverage, as both mention her only in passing as the owner of the dog. In any case, these sources don't seem like enough to make an individual dog notable, let alone the owner of one of them. AryKun (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletedoes not meet WP:GNG--Rrmmll22 (talk) 00:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]