User talk:Andrewpmk

Archives: /Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5

Unusual usages of traffic lights

Good job on the sectioning on this article. Just what was needed. I didn't have the patience to look at the previous mass of information for very long. Organising it must have been some job.

zoney ♣ talk 13:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Colored pencils

Hi Andrew.

Can I just draw your attention towards the image page of Image:Colored pencils.jpg. The boilerplate notice there states that the image is from stock xchng. Some image from here are copyrighted, and although you state that abdullah released all rights to this, you might want to read the notice under the image to see what you can do. Thanks! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

clearfelling

>if you believe that the article should be called "clearcutting", please discuss it on the talk page

Okay, I did that. Now what? -The Gomm 04:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Colored pencils.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Colored pencils.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 11:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

--Sherool (talk) 11:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstarworthy Effort

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Persian Poet Gal, hereby award you this barnstar for your numerous anti-vandal reverts!¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You beat me to reverting vandalism twice in a row within the past 2 minutes. So here ya go. :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 06:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I know you just got another one seconds ago, but I think you deserve another one. :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 06:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalwatch

• I've noticed your efforts on vandalwatch on the article of Sandbox; You deserve a welldone, but it seems you have enough barnstars already.
• However, may I draw your attention to the fact that nationalists seem to have hijacket this page again to blurb against Pakistan; I don't have any feelings pro or contra, but Wiki is apolitical.

LouisBB 06:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page — [1]. Rintrah 15:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Kcvi-coat-of-arms-2.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 01:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:OregonCity.png

Thanks for uploading Image:OregonCity.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

RV

I noticed you RV'd my CSD- I would like to ask why, and point you to WP:N. --Tlim7882 10:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, glad we could sort that out. Good luck, Tlim7882 10:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't revert me...

...in the middle of a debate. Especially if I said nothing wrong. Were you following it? IZAK 22:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Unsigned comment by 72.65.215.142

yeah but that is true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.215.142 (talk • contribs)

Unsigned comment by 12.145.133.77

sorry andrew. i'll stop, just for you though. and only cause you asked nicely!!! =] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.145.133.77 (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Kersal Massive page

Hi Andrew. Having read the guidelines on deletions, I'm still unsure as to why the KM page has been proposed for deletion. Could you please clarify that for me? Thanks. White hotel 13:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello once more Andrew. Thank you for directing me to the page on guidelines for notability - as you may have seen from reading the message I left you above, I had already read it. I wasn't aware that the page had already been deleted once - I do, however, think that (unless wiki believes all UGC sites to be trivial content), the KM satisfies the 3rd condition for notability. Could you point me to any guidelines that state that UGC sites ARE necessarily trivial? White hotel 11:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

sorry

Hi. This is headsrfun. i'd just like 2 apologise 4 taking up ur time with u having to fix my edits. i only just realised i had messages today on the 3rd of feb 2007. i was just having fun and i didn't think about anyone else while i was doing it. i promise that i won't do it again. once again, my apologies. Headsrfun.

Image:94-36-0.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:94-36-0.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 02:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)