User talk:Omegatron: Difference between revisions
→ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Omegatron/Archive/November, 2020, User talk:Omegatron/Archive/April, 2020) (bot |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== Zotero plug-in == |
|||
Hi! I've just seen your last edition [[Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero|here]] in and I'm wondering if there is a problem of translation. There are two extensions for browsers (Chrome and Firefox): I'm using them. They are called Zotero Connector. Could you please explain a bit more those changes on the page? (I'm not interested in the en.wiki page, rather with the current features of Zotero). Thank you.--[[User:Maria zaos|Maria zaos]] ([[User talk:Maria zaos|talk]]) 12:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: Zotero used to ''be'' a Firefox extension, entirely self-contained, but Mozilla abandoned support for powerful extensions and only allow WebExtensions now, so Zotero was forced to convert it into a standalone application, with Zotero Connector extensions to "connect" the two together. https://www.zotero.org/blog/a-unified-zotero-experience/ That Wikipedia page must have been written when Zotero was still an extension, since it said "There are two different options for how to install it" — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]] ([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 17:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 --> |
|||
==Feb 2021== |
==Feb 2021== |
||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
Revision as of 01:01, 23 November 2021
Wikipedia:Babel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Search user languages |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 30 days will be automatically moved to this month's archive. Other months can be accessed from my list of archives. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Feb 2021
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Slatersteven (talk) 16:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Year Zero ARG
I remember your spectrogram on "My Violent Heart" back playing TYZ ARG and I am trying to find a copy of the song that contained the image of The Presence. I couldnt see it when I ran the album version through the spectrogram. I am working on a project trying to make it immortal in the form of an NFT (non-fungible token) by minting it into the Ethereum Blockchain. I would pay you for your help if there are special setting I need or if you still have to whole file ( I searched your uploads and didnt see it).
Let me know if you still have the file anywhere. I know its been 14 years but I thought I would try.
Thank You so much! -Gnarl
You can contact me at mangham.matt@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnarltusk (talk • contribs) 22:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
"60 Hz" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 60 Hz. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#60 Hz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Um, really?
You reinstated:
- Wordpress
- Typepad
- Patheos
- Econlog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Medium
- LessWrong
These are not reliable sources. Most of them are self-published, and all were primary for the material they support. The reason this article has been a redirect for four years is because there is no discussion of this concept in the academic economic press. You're doing a great job of showing that this coverage still does not exist. Guy (help! - typo?) 23:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, they absolutely are reliable sources. See WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSOPINION and WP:BLPSELFPUB.
- That a source is "from a blog domain" or "a Libertarian think tank" does not justify removal. You may certainly make the argument that those references don't demonstrate notability (which I would disagree with), but they are still reliable sources for the facts they reference. I don't know where your vendetta against this article came from, but your repeated blanking of it while I'm editing it is causing me a lot of distress, so I'm logging off for a while. :( — Omegatron (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)