Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Hugo Sporleder: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 12: Line 12:
<p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 23:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|James Hugo Sporleder]]</noinclude></p>
<p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 23:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|James Hugo Sporleder]]</noinclude></p>
*'''Delete''' - Not convinced, even with [[User:Urve|Urve]]'s due diligence. I could not even find a single mention of the subject worth noting on Jstor, etc. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain|talk]]) 22:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Not convinced, even with [[User:Urve|Urve]]'s due diligence. I could not even find a single mention of the subject worth noting on Jstor, etc. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain|talk]]) 22:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. I did find two mentions of him on [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jillistathistsoc.106.2.0224 JSTOR], a misspelling of his name [https://files.shsmo.org/manuscripts/saint-louis/S0509.pdf here] and [https://www.beyondhousing.org/the-real-footprints-of-life-jim-sporleder a blog about a Jim Sporleder who passed away in 2016] with content that matches the content on [[James Hugo Sporleder]]. However, the sources do not meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Heartmusic678|Heartmusic678]] ([[User talk:Heartmusic678|talk]]) 14:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:32, 1 December 2021

James Hugo Sporleder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an activist, not properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for activists. The notability claim here is that he was involved in a group, but the potential notability of the group is not necessarily an instant notability freebie for every individual member of it -- in order to establish him as notable, there have to be reliable sources about him and his work. But there are none here, and the article was created by an editor whose username strongly suggests that they're a relative of the subject (which is a conflict of interest). As I don't have access to any database in which I could recover American newspaper coverage from the 1960s, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better resources can actually improve the sourcing, but nothing stated in the text is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have his notability established through media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]