Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weekender (album): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Weekender (album): *'''Redirect''' to Aquagen, no need to deal with this separately from the band. ~~~~ |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Germany|list of Germany-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 18:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Germany|list of Germany-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 18:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aquagen]], no need to deal with this separately from the band. —[[User:Kusma|Kusma]] ([[User talk:Kusma|talk]]) 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aquagen]], no need to deal with this separately from the band. —[[User:Kusma|Kusma]] ([[User talk:Kusma|talk]]) 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Redirect''' to [[Aquagen]]. For future reference, this is the standard procedure these days for non-notable albums, and in this case it could have been done [[WP:BOLD|boldly]] because the album clearly has no reliable evidence of notability. ---<span style="font-family: Calibri">[[User:doomsdayer520|<b style="color:#66CDAA"><small>DOOMSDAYER</small>520</b>]]<small> ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|TALK]]|[[Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|CONTRIBS]]) </small></span> 01:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:42, 9 December 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Weekender (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, no reviews from reliable sources, no reviews on allmusic or discogs that are cited in the article Artem.G (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Artem.G (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aquagen, no need to deal with this separately from the band. —Kusma (talk) 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aquagen. For future reference, this is the standard procedure these days for non-notable albums, and in this case it could have been done boldly because the album clearly has no reliable evidence of notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)