Jump to content

User talk:SerYoga: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Tag: Reverted
Line 30: Line 30:


{{unblock reviewed |1=Haven't used any other account since the block. [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:SerYoga SerYoga] is the only account I use. [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 01:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC) |decline = I'm confused by your statement, "since the block". This account was confirmed to {{np|Serijvip}}. You need to specifically address that. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed |1=Haven't used any other account since the block. [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:SerYoga SerYoga] is the only account I use. [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 01:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC) |decline = I'm confused by your statement, "since the block". This account was confirmed to {{np|Serijvip}}. You need to specifically address that. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)}}
: Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from using English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? If you wanted to stop me from using Serijvip, I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register any other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
: Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from editing English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? This is my main account that I already use for 12+ years in Wiki. If you wanted to stop me from using any other account (such as Serijvip), I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:43, 6 January 2022

October 2019

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rambo: Last Blood, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You've gone incognito (talkcontribs) 09:22, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stone Temple Pilots. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 00:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove citations, especially when the template itself recommends citing the production companies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerYoga (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Haven't used any other account since the block. SerYoga is the only account I use. SerYoga (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm confused by your statement, "since the block". This account was confirmed to Serijvip. You need to specifically address that. Yamla (talk) 10:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from editing English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? This is my main account that I already use for 12+ years in Wiki. If you wanted to stop me from using any other account (such as Serijvip), I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - SerYoga (talk) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]