User talk:SerYoga

October 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rambo: Last Blood, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:22, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stone Temple Pilots. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mortal Kombat: Annihilation, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove citations, especially when the template itself recommends citing the production companies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerYoga (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Haven't used any other account since the block. SerYoga is the only account I use. SerYoga (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm confused by your statement, "since the block". This account was confirmed to Serijvip. You need to specifically address that. Yamla (talk) 10:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SerYoga (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from editing English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? This is the account I use in Wiki for 12+ years already. If you wanted to stop me from using an alternate account (such as Serijvip), I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - SerYoga (talk) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from editing English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? This is the account I use in Wiki for [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:SerYoga 12+ years] already. If you wanted to stop me from using an alternate account (such as Serijvip), I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from editing English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? This is the account I use in Wiki for [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:SerYoga 12+ years] already. If you wanted to stop me from using an alternate account (such as Serijvip), I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Is it really that necessary to keep this account in a permanent ban and block me from editing English Wikipedia for the rest of my life? This is the account I use in Wiki for [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:SerYoga 12+ years] already. If you wanted to stop me from using an alternate account (such as Serijvip), I'm fine with it and not ever gonna use it or register other accounts. Just unblock SerYoga so I can keep using En-Wiki. - [[User:SerYoga|SerYoga]] ([[User talk:SerYoga#top|talk]]) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}