Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifco tray: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:15, 11 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A merge discussion (or even just a bold merge, for that matter), is highly encouraged. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ifco tray

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable product. DimaG (talk) 04:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These containers are everywhere in the food retail business - you've seen them if you've been to the greengrocers in many countries around the world. The only non Wiki-referential source I could find was from the manufacturer's website, so I added that link as a reference in the article. Suprising how few RS showed up in a G-search for something as ubiquitous as these. Even so, until someone comes up with a generic "Reusable plastic container" article, this is all we have. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. On the one hand, I sort of suspect there are sources out there (government reports and investment newsletters and trade magazines spring to mind), probably using some generic name rather than a brand name. But the article we have now seems kind of over-specific and short. Perhaps it could be merged into Crate#Plastic crates?

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to lack coverage in reliable sources.--Pink Bull 05:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<span style="color:orange;">'''JForget''' </span>]] 01:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 *'''Delete'''. Appears to lack coverage in reliable sources.--''[[User:Pink Bull|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color: #FF1493">Pink</span>]][[User talk:Pink Bull|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color: #FF1493">Bull</span>]]'' 05:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>