Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Edward Mickolus: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Edward Mickolus]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. albeit weakly. There is no consensus to delete this. <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 01:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
===[[:Edward Mickolus]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Edward Mickolus}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 1#{{anchorencode:Edward Mickolus}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1069251621/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Edward Mickolus}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 1#{{anchorencode:Edward Mickolus}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1069251621/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 18: Line 23:
*'''Weak keep'''? There may be a weak pass of [[WP:AUTHOR]], but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC).
*'''Weak keep'''? There may be a weak pass of [[WP:AUTHOR]], but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC).
*'''Keep''' ''Marquis Who's Who'' doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [https://www.jacksonville.com/story/entertainment/books/2021/11/28/book-review-the-creativity-sourcebook-edward-mickolus/8726804002/], [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/transnational-terrorism-a-chronology-of-events-19681979-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xxxvii-967-7500-the-literature-of-terrorism-a-selectively-annotated-bibliography-compiled-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xi-553-5500/7A5942C2D2E1A1B3E8BE6B7CCB8FA27C], [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002787031001004]. [[Special:Contributions/67.168.136.107|67.168.136.107]] ([[User talk:67.168.136.107|talk]]) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' ''Marquis Who's Who'' doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [https://www.jacksonville.com/story/entertainment/books/2021/11/28/book-review-the-creativity-sourcebook-edward-mickolus/8726804002/], [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/transnational-terrorism-a-chronology-of-events-19681979-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xxxvii-967-7500-the-literature-of-terrorism-a-selectively-annotated-bibliography-compiled-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xi-553-5500/7A5942C2D2E1A1B3E8BE6B7CCB8FA27C], [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002787031001004]. [[Special:Contributions/67.168.136.107|67.168.136.107]] ([[User talk:67.168.136.107|talk]]) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 01:16, 9 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. albeit weakly. There is no consensus to delete this. Star Mississippi 01:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Mickolus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication in the article or in searches that this article passes WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. All references are lacking in either significance, independence, or reliability. Also violates WP:NOTRESUME. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep So I came across this article in the references section of Hassan Al-Turabi's article. I think it helps show that it's a good source for the article, but other than that, I can't think of any other reason why he'd count as notable. However, I posted on the talk page and noticeboard specifically without mentioning article deletion since I disagree with Wikipedia's notability guidelines in general, but if it violates them, then there's not much else to do other than removal. Seabass715 (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Seabass715.[reply]
  • Weak keep? There may be a weak pass of WP:AUTHOR, but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep Marquis Who's Who doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [1], [2], [3]. 67.168.136.107 (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.