Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Edward Mickolus: Closed as keep (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''keep'''. albeit weakly. There is no consensus to delete this. <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">[[User:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#a117f2;">Star</span>]] [[User talk:Star Mississippi|<span style="color:#df00fe;">Mississippi</span>]]</span> 01:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|1=Edward Mickolus}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 1#{{anchorencode:Edward Mickolus}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1069251621/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
:{{la|1=Edward Mickolus}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Mickolus|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 1#{{anchorencode:Edward Mickolus}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1069251621/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
||
Line 18: | Line 23: | ||
*'''Weak keep'''? There may be a weak pass of [[WP:AUTHOR]], but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC). |
*'''Weak keep'''? There may be a weak pass of [[WP:AUTHOR]], but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC). |
||
*'''Keep''' ''Marquis Who's Who'' doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [https://www.jacksonville.com/story/entertainment/books/2021/11/28/book-review-the-creativity-sourcebook-edward-mickolus/8726804002/], [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/transnational-terrorism-a-chronology-of-events-19681979-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xxxvii-967-7500-the-literature-of-terrorism-a-selectively-annotated-bibliography-compiled-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xi-553-5500/7A5942C2D2E1A1B3E8BE6B7CCB8FA27C], [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002787031001004]. [[Special:Contributions/67.168.136.107|67.168.136.107]] ([[User talk:67.168.136.107|talk]]) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' ''Marquis Who's Who'' doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [https://www.jacksonville.com/story/entertainment/books/2021/11/28/book-review-the-creativity-sourcebook-edward-mickolus/8726804002/], [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/transnational-terrorism-a-chronology-of-events-19681979-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xxxvii-967-7500-the-literature-of-terrorism-a-selectively-annotated-bibliography-compiled-by-edward-f-mickolus-westport-conn-greenwood-press-1980-pp-xi-553-5500/7A5942C2D2E1A1B3E8BE6B7CCB8FA27C], [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002787031001004]. [[Special:Contributions/67.168.136.107|67.168.136.107]] ([[User talk:67.168.136.107|talk]]) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 01:16, 9 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. albeit weakly. There is no consensus to delete this. Star Mississippi 01:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edward Mickolus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication in the article or in searches that this article passes WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. All references are lacking in either significance, independence, or reliability. Also violates WP:NOTRESUME. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: This looks like a good faith 2011 contribution by now blocked User:Geo Swan. This diff shows the insertion of all the resume info in 2018 by the subject themself. No opinion about the outcome here. BusterD (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep So I came across this article in the references section of Hassan Al-Turabi's article. I think it helps show that it's a good source for the article, but other than that, I can't think of any other reason why he'd count as notable. However, I posted on the talk page and noticeboard specifically without mentioning article deletion since I disagree with Wikipedia's notability guidelines in general, but if it violates them, then there's not much else to do other than removal. Seabass715 (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Seabass715.
- Weak keep? There may be a weak pass of WP:AUTHOR, but the BLP contains a vast amount of dross that should be deleted. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC).
- Keep Marquis Who's Who doesn't count though and other sources briefly discuss him. But I found some book reviews so inclined towards keep. Coverage: [1], [2], [3]. 67.168.136.107 (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.