Talk:Hollywood, Los Angeles: Difference between revisions
→Requested move 9 March 2022: Clarified. |
→Requested move 9 March 2022: neutral on one, oppose the other |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
*'''Support''' first, '''oppose''' second. Cinema of the United States is a clearer name for an article than Hollywood. Hollywood is commonly used to refer to both American cinema and the neighborhood in Los Angeles. [[User:Crossover1370|<span style="color:#0000FF">'''''Crossover1370'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Crossover1370|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Crossover1370|contribs]]) 16:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' first, '''oppose''' second. Cinema of the United States is a clearer name for an article than Hollywood. Hollywood is commonly used to refer to both American cinema and the neighborhood in Los Angeles. [[User:Crossover1370|<span style="color:#0000FF">'''''Crossover1370'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Crossover1370|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Crossover1370|contribs]]) 16:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support first''', '''oppose second''', and '''move disambig to primary for now''' - Contrary to the hype, the Hollywood, CA-based film industry is not the totality of cinema in the US. I would support the creation of a proper "[[:Hollywood (film industry)]]" article detailing the history and current impact of the industry centered in that city. [[:Cinema of the United States]] needs to be all-inclusive and not use "Hollywood" as a synonym so much. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 17:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Support first''', '''oppose second''', and '''move disambig to primary for now''' - Contrary to the hype, the Hollywood, CA-based film industry is not the totality of cinema in the US. I would support the creation of a proper "[[:Hollywood (film industry)]]" article detailing the history and current impact of the industry centered in that city. [[:Cinema of the United States]] needs to be all-inclusive and not use "Hollywood" as a synonym so much. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 17:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
* '''Neutral first''', '''oppose second'''. The above comments have sufficiently explained why the second move is a bad idea. I'm neutral on making [[Hollywood]] a DAB. [[User:力]] (powera, [[User talk:力|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/力|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 00:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:26, 12 March 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hollywood, Los Angeles article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Alternative name derivation
Toyon is a prominent component of the coastal sage scrub plant community, and is a part of drought-adapted chaparral and mixed oak woodland habitats. It is also known by the common names Christmas berry and California holly. Accordingly, "the abundance of this species in the hills above Los Angeles... gave rise to the name Hollywood."[1]
- "'Tis the season when the rich green crown of the toyon bush is aglow with a mass of red berries. At a time when most members of the chaparral community have donned their winter gray, the toyon--also known variously as Christmas berry or California holly--is the most festive of flora.
- "This holly-day hike to Mt. Hollywood, highest peak in Griffith Park, offers fine clear-day views of the Los Angeles basin, framed by the Christmas berry bushes growing alongside the trail. It's believed that masses of this California native shrub growing on the hills above Hollywood gave the community its name.
- "Botanically speaking, the 6-to-25-foot high evergreen shrub is in no sense a holly, but its timely appearance is a delight to the holiday hiker and something to point to when friends from colder climes claim that "there's nothing Christmasy about Southern California." (It might seem inviting to deck your halls with boughs of California holly, but collection is strictly forbidden by state law.)"[1]
- Kortoso (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Given that there were already half a dozen places in the USA called Hollywood by the time of the founding of Hollywood, Ca., I think the story about the Chinese man is probably apocryphal. For that matter, there have been places in Ireland and England called Hollywood for centuries.Ordinary Person (talk) 03:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- The history of Hollywood section needs better sourcing. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 08:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Article with another origin https://www.irishcentral.com/travel/hollywood-name-ireland where named by an immigrant from Hollywood,_County_Wicklow. Chuunen Baka (talk • contribs) 14:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Rundel, Philip W; Gustafson, Robert (2005). Introduction to the Plant Life of Southern California: Coast to Foothills. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. p. 103. ISBN 0-520-24199-1.
"H'w'd" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect H'w'd. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 2#H'w'd until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
"Tinseltown" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tinseltown. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#Tinseltown until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Cnilep (talk) 10:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 9 March 2022
The request to rename this article to Hollywood, Los Angeles has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
– I believe the current names for these two articles has a few issues: it leaves Cinema of the United States at not its WP:COMMONNAME, leaves Hollywood not WP:CONSISTENT with all the other Neighborhoods of Los Angeles, and does not give the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term "Hollywood" to the movie industry. "Hollywood actor/actress", History of Hollywood, Hollywood blacklist etc., references to "Hollywood" in reliable sources and on Wikipedia are rarely referring to the actual physical location versus the industry named after it. The current situation leaves lots of room for erroneous links in articles to a specific (though still notable and important) Los Angeles neighborhood, many of which can be seen when looking at the list. Examples of reliable sources using "Hollywood" without clarifying they mean the industry not the place: [2][3][4][5][6]. I had difficulty finding articles that use "Hollywood" to refer to the place without clarifying they mean the neighborhood outside of local reports regarding construction and crime, since so much of a google search is about the movie industry. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- How about having the disambiguation page at the basename? (which would be support 1st, oppose 2nd). One could argue that there's no primary topic between [Hollywood referring to the actual place in LA] vs. [Hollywood as a synonym for the cinema of the United States], so in that case, moving the disambiguation page Hollywood (disambiguation) to the basename of "Hollywood" might make sense. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- I considered that as a possibility, but I don't think it ultimately addresses 2 of the 3 major issues with how it currently is, assuming that Hollywood would still need to move to Hollywood, Los Angeles. Most importantly, I see the industry as the clear primary topic from shear volume of discussion of cinema in the United States (entire fields of study are based around it, magazines named after, etc.) versus the neighborhood that derives almost all of its notability from the metonymic industry .--Cerebral726 (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support 1st, oppose 2nd per Paintspot, while this or the Cinema may qualify as a broad-concept article Hollywood (miniseries) gets 40,829 views compared with 52,580[[7]] for this one and there are a lot of other uses so the DAB may be the best option. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support first, oppose second. Cinema of the United States is a clearer name for an article than Hollywood. Hollywood is commonly used to refer to both American cinema and the neighborhood in Los Angeles. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 16:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support first, oppose second, and move disambig to primary for now - Contrary to the hype, the Hollywood, CA-based film industry is not the totality of cinema in the US. I would support the creation of a proper "Hollywood (film industry)" article detailing the history and current impact of the industry centered in that city. Cinema of the United States needs to be all-inclusive and not use "Hollywood" as a synonym so much. -- Netoholic @ 17:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral first, oppose second. The above comments have sufficiently explained why the second move is a bad idea. I'm neutral on making Hollywood a DAB. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- B-Class Los Angeles articles
- High-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- B-Class Southern California articles
- High-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Requested moves