Jump to content

User talk:Sajaypal007: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 29: Line 29:
Hi Sajaypal007, Congrats for getting rollback in your kitty. I want to report a user [[U|Windygod108]] whom [[Special:Contributions/Windygod108|contributions are clearly]] full of non reliable sources and an attempt to push their caste. I reverted their edits on one of article but it's quite troublesome process without rollback to revert all of their edits. Please take a look at them. Thanks. [[User:Frank Springer|Frank Springer]] ([[User talk:Frank Springer|talk]]) 13:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sajaypal007, Congrats for getting rollback in your kitty. I want to report a user [[U|Windygod108]] whom [[Special:Contributions/Windygod108|contributions are clearly]] full of non reliable sources and an attempt to push their caste. I reverted their edits on one of article but it's quite troublesome process without rollback to revert all of their edits. Please take a look at them. Thanks. [[User:Frank Springer|Frank Springer]] ([[User talk:Frank Springer|talk]]) 13:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
: Already reverted before your message, this user added the word gurjar on tens of pages without any sources. [[User:Sajaypal007|Sajaypal007]] ([[User talk:Sajaypal007#top|talk]]) 13:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
: Already reverted before your message, this user added the word gurjar on tens of pages without any sources. [[User:Sajaypal007|Sajaypal007]] ([[User talk:Sajaypal007#top|talk]]) 13:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
::{{reply to|Sajaypal007}} Thank you very much. I think regular editors like you should regularly keep an eye on their contributions. Once they reach autoconfirmed status they will vandalise even more articles by pushing their caste. I doubt they will might end up getting blocked seeing their POV. Thanks & congrats again for rollback and pending change reviewer rights. [[User:Frank Springer|Frank Springer]] ([[User talk:Frank Springer|talk]]) 13:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:48, 28 March 2022

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Katietalk 19:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sajaypal007 (talk) 10:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Sajaypal007. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Ks0stm (TCGE)  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  07:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, will ping you in case of any confusion or questions regarding rollback. Sajaypal007 (talk) 10:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting Windygod108

Hi Sajaypal007, Congrats for getting rollback in your kitty. I want to report a user Windygod108 whom contributions are clearly full of non reliable sources and an attempt to push their caste. I reverted their edits on one of article but it's quite troublesome process without rollback to revert all of their edits. Please take a look at them. Thanks. Frank Springer (talk) 13:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already reverted before your message, this user added the word gurjar on tens of pages without any sources. Sajaypal007 (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sajaypal007: Thank you very much. I think regular editors like you should regularly keep an eye on their contributions. Once they reach autoconfirmed status they will vandalise even more articles by pushing their caste. I doubt they will might end up getting blocked seeing their POV. Thanks & congrats again for rollback and pending change reviewer rights. Frank Springer (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]