Jump to content

User talk:Robynthehode: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 35: Line 35:


:CTBUH says it is on hold. Unless you can provide another reliable source to say otherwise it should remain out of the list. You seeing the building being worked on is irrevelant. That is [[WP:OR]] and is not allowed in Wikipedia. Please take any discussion of this to the article talk page - the proper place for content discussion - so other editors can contribute. But please do not revert my edit without that discussion. Thanks [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode#top|talk]]) 19:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
:CTBUH says it is on hold. Unless you can provide another reliable source to say otherwise it should remain out of the list. You seeing the building being worked on is irrevelant. That is [[WP:OR]] and is not allowed in Wikipedia. Please take any discussion of this to the article talk page - the proper place for content discussion - so other editors can contribute. But please do not revert my edit without that discussion. Thanks [[User:Robynthehode|Robynthehode]] ([[User talk:Robynthehode#top|talk]]) 19:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

== Please have a look at these articles ==

http://www.ahmedabadbusinesspages.com/palais-royale-worli-tallest-residential-tower-mumbai/

https://www.justbaazaar.com/listing/palais-royale-mumbai-tallest-structure-of-india/
As i said in the earlier message CTBUH takes a lot of time to update their databases it does not reflect the correct information.

Revision as of 19:40, 1 April 2022



My edit in Oceania.

(Sorry if this is the wrong place to message you, I'm somewhat new here) So to your rollback of my edit, I never stated Oceania was a continent, because it isn't. The edit I previously made was stating Oceania is a continental region (which it is and should be rightfully named as such). The Oceanic region includes the Australian and Pacific plates, as well as the sunken Zealandia continent. Some sources say Oceania is a continental region, others call it a continent, and yes the latter is 100% false. newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Oceania has a great explanation, I advise you check it out! Cheers Mongol9984 (talk) 08:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is usual to discuss article issues in the article talk page so that other editors can see an discussion and contribute if they want. So please go there to discuss this. However I will reply briefly here. The status of Oceania has been discussed extensively and the consensus as I understand it is to call it a geographic region. Any change to this requires a new consensus WP:CONSENSUS. Again take this discussion to the article talke page but do not revert my edit without discusssion and a consensus for change Robynthehode (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

whats your evidence

how can u prove the mirror is a bad source cause its really not you douchebag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Wadlow 1920 (talkcontribs) 20:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red top (tabloid) newspapers are generally considered poor sources. Although not on the list of perennial sources WP:RSPSRC they are best avoided. If you disagreed with my edit the correct thing is to take my edit in good faith WP:FAITH and discuss it on the talk page rather than being uncivil WP:CIVIL and calling other editors names. Further examples of incivility will warrant reporting you to admins and asking for a block. This is your one chance to behave according to Wikipedia protocols. Robynthehode (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hey everyone!

this guy refuses to believe reliable sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Wadlow 1920 (talkcontribs) 20:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to delete this unfounded accusation but I thought I'd leave it and if any editor wants to look at my edit history and posts on talk pages and edit summaries to ascertain my Wikipedia editing quality they are very welcome to do so. Robynthehode (talk) 12:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your removal of Palais royale at list of tallest buildings in India

Hello, In your last edit to List of tallest buildings in India you removed Palais Royale Mumbai from the list and the reason you gave was that its neither complete or architecturally topped out and that true but the building has structurally topped, it had structurally topped out back in 2018. According to Skyscraper Center Palais Royale is on hold but that is not the case construction is going on in full swing i can see it with my own eyes in fact the full building is lit up at night and the cranes are also lit up at night and construction is clearly going on. Anyone who lives in Mumbai can see that. CTBUH takes a lot of time to update its databases many buildings like 360 west, oberoi sky city etc are already complete and fully occupied but according to CTBUH they are still under construction, Palais Royale is no different the building has structurally topped out and is under construction so i'm restoring the page to the earlier version.Joy goel (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CTBUH says it is on hold. Unless you can provide another reliable source to say otherwise it should remain out of the list. You seeing the building being worked on is irrevelant. That is WP:OR and is not allowed in Wikipedia. Please take any discussion of this to the article talk page - the proper place for content discussion - so other editors can contribute. But please do not revert my edit without that discussion. Thanks Robynthehode (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at these articles

http://www.ahmedabadbusinesspages.com/palais-royale-worli-tallest-residential-tower-mumbai/

https://www.justbaazaar.com/listing/palais-royale-mumbai-tallest-structure-of-india/ As i said in the earlier message CTBUH takes a lot of time to update their databases it does not reflect the correct information.