Jump to content

Talk:Arm's length principle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Arms length principle could create a second transfer price?
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Arm's length principle most central to transfer pricing and tax. Arms length transfer pricing with a distinction to be made between business and taxation transfer price. Acknowledge that under the Arms length principle companies will often develop two prices. One to motivate managers and one to satisfy government? --[[User:Roberth23|Roberth23]] 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Arm's length principle most central to transfer pricing and tax. Arms length transfer pricing with a distinction to be made between business and taxation transfer price. Acknowledge that under the Arms length principle companies will often develop two prices. One to motivate managers and one to satisfy government? --[[User:Roberth23|Roberth23]] 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

This article is written in British English and does not represent a world view. "Labour laws" in the United States when it comes to firings are normally handled by "Employment at will," which gives fired employees little legal recourse if fired for a non-discriminatory reason. I suggest that this be edited and a better example be used to illustrate arm's length transactions, hopefully, one with a broader legal basis.

Revision as of 20:57, 7 February 2009

Arm's length principle most central to transfer pricing and tax. Arms length transfer pricing with a distinction to be made between business and taxation transfer price. Acknowledge that under the Arms length principle companies will often develop two prices. One to motivate managers and one to satisfy government? --Roberth23 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is written in British English and does not represent a world view. "Labour laws" in the United States when it comes to firings are normally handled by "Employment at will," which gives fired employees little legal recourse if fired for a non-discriminatory reason. I suggest that this be edited and a better example be used to illustrate arm's length transactions, hopefully, one with a broader legal basis.