Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Rosenblatt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 08:28, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Michael Rosenblatt

Michael Rosenblatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person's notability is questionable. No sources/references whatsoever provided. Article claims that he has signed Madonna to her first contract. That was the only notable thing I can find on this person. Also, Goggle search has come up with nothing reliable or pertinant [1], except this interview from a music retailer :[2]. Some Ghits may seem to be about him, but in fact they talk about another person with the same name as description does not really correspond with what this article describes. Jolenine (Talk - My Contribs) 01:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Agree with nominator. Resume-like vanity piece. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 17:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I don't have the time to do so at the moment, but anyone interested in evaluating this properly may want to have a look at these and these search results. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:04, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. To my surprise, I found that he actually did sign Madonna. See [3] The article is awful, though, and needs to be stubbed or fumigated or something.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
• Keep, for the record, although I would have thought that my previous comment, based on the idea that AfD is not a vote, would have been enough for this to be kept per obvious notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.