Jump to content

Talk:The Powerpuff Girls: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 87: Line 87:
::::::I don't see why there should be another article covering the franchise, as the current one based on the 1998 series covers all the significant information just fine, including derivative works. Yes, there have been countless books, and toys, and all sorts of merchandise, but those pertain to a particular iteration of the show which already has an article of its own, already expanding on those details. Not to mention there are lists of videogames, characters and soundtracks, so wouldn't another article be reiterative?. A Disambiguation page would suffice, if anything. [[User:JBOOK17|JBOOK17]] ([[User talk:JBOOK17|talk]]) 03:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
::::::I don't see why there should be another article covering the franchise, as the current one based on the 1998 series covers all the significant information just fine, including derivative works. Yes, there have been countless books, and toys, and all sorts of merchandise, but those pertain to a particular iteration of the show which already has an article of its own, already expanding on those details. Not to mention there are lists of videogames, characters and soundtracks, so wouldn't another article be reiterative?. A Disambiguation page would suffice, if anything. [[User:JBOOK17|JBOOK17]] ([[User talk:JBOOK17|talk]]) 03:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
:::::::I don't see why a franchise should be shoved into the article of its original media, it seems almost like [[Wikipedia:Undue weight|undue weight]] to have this much info on all the other media in this article. Personally I would rather merge the video game and soundtrack lists into a franchise article. Earlier today an IP created an article for the series here [[The Powerpuff Girls (franchise)]], I plan on expanding that today.[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 10:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
:::::::I don't see why a franchise should be shoved into the article of its original media, it seems almost like [[Wikipedia:Undue weight|undue weight]] to have this much info on all the other media in this article. Personally I would rather merge the video game and soundtrack lists into a franchise article. Earlier today an IP created an article for the series here [[The Powerpuff Girls (franchise)]], I plan on expanding that today.[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 10:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
::::::::I don't think its fair to blame the original series for that. [[Powerpuff Girls Z]] had their own separate media which is nicely fit into the article's body. The 2006 series also had its own media which is mentioned in article. Trying to compare media in my view is opinionated as each series had their own reception and either succeeded or failed more than the other. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 13:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:07, 5 August 2022

Template:Vital article

Good articleThe Powerpuff Girls has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 6, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 7, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 26, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2021

Please replace the template

with

. 67.173.23.66 (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cartoon Network canceled the show and updated it 🫣😱😑 75.129.125.47 (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 August 2021

I want to edit. But fuckin Canterbury tail did it.

H Hhcfyfyb (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stylization as THE POWERPUFF GǐRLS

This is how the logo is stylized, so can we specify that on the article? Faster than Thunder (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to suggest adding a link to Craig Kellman's page in the "Awards and nominations" section. ~𝗮𝗺𝗽𝘀 talk contributions 22:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Thank you. — Paper Luigi TC 02:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New TV series

Earlier today they just announced a new Powerpuff Girls series with Craig McCracken working on it, and it's being made by Hanna-Barbera Studios Europe. So why isn't it mentioned on the article? 98.165.84.45 (talk) 00:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting proposal

I propose that this article shall be split into two articles, one for the TV series (kept at this name) and another for the larger franchise named Powerpuff Girls (franchise). ★Trekker (talk) 16:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the proposal. PPG was huge for Cartoon Network in the '90s and has expanded into other series, video games, a feature film, toys, etc. It just makes sense to me at this time to split off a franchise article. — Paper Luigi TC 19:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Make a draft first on how it would look as I don't think much can be split off. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've began a draft Draft:Powerpuff Girls (franchise).★Trekker (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also made a draft for the new animated TV series. Draft:Untitled Powerpuff Girls animated series.★Trekker (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The drafts are devoid of any real content except for section outlines. I am interested in adding content to these when I get enough free time. That being said, I was expecting to see more from the draft author as these haven't been touched for six days. — Paper Luigi TC 03:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, I also still don't think much can be split off from the main articles to warrant a separate article. Yes toys were made and merchandise was sold, but you have to show how this had a notable impact in paragraph form that couldn't easily be fit here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Paper Luigi: Sorry I'm busy with other stuff, this isn't a priority right now and I don't see there being any hurry.★Trekker (talk) 06:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why there should be another article covering the franchise, as the current one based on the 1998 series covers all the significant information just fine, including derivative works. Yes, there have been countless books, and toys, and all sorts of merchandise, but those pertain to a particular iteration of the show which already has an article of its own, already expanding on those details. Not to mention there are lists of videogames, characters and soundtracks, so wouldn't another article be reiterative?. A Disambiguation page would suffice, if anything. JBOOK17 (talk) 03:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why a franchise should be shoved into the article of its original media, it seems almost like undue weight to have this much info on all the other media in this article. Personally I would rather merge the video game and soundtrack lists into a franchise article. Earlier today an IP created an article for the series here The Powerpuff Girls (franchise), I plan on expanding that today.★Trekker (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think its fair to blame the original series for that. Powerpuff Girls Z had their own separate media which is nicely fit into the article's body. The 2006 series also had its own media which is mentioned in article. Trying to compare media in my view is opinionated as each series had their own reception and either succeeded or failed more than the other. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]