User talk:Aderiqueza

Hi. I have been seeing a lot of edit summaries such as those you leave and I am curious to know if you are using some tools and whether the use of such tools is helpful. See this discussion. Surtsicna (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand why you keep attacking me.

This is a competition every participant in Kwara State registered for,and we are to do summary of Added image #WPWP #WPWPKWR at the end of every summary for every added image to count.

And Yes, there's a tool provided for participants to use for this campaign. Aderiqueza (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, please don't be offended. There's no attacks on you. It's just that those edit summaries, to people who don't know about that contest, are hard to understand and some people were wondering where this is coming from.

Your efforts are of course welcome, on the whole, but you may have noticed that some of your edits have been reverted (by Surtsicna as well as by myself). Please in the future avoid adding unauthentic and low-quality images of historical personalities like this or this. These are not useful in articles, and in the particular case of the early Popes, we actually had an RfC deciding that they are not wanted.

Also, please don't use "Photo of..." in the captions of historical images that are clearly paintings or drawings, not photos, as you did here [1] and in a couple other instances. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

reply

Thanks for explaining further,this is what Surtsicna should have done instead of making me feel discouraged by portraying me badly on the noticeboard. I'm a newbie in this,and things should be explained to me, not making me feel bad. Aderiqueza (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lewis O'Brien (footballer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GiantSnowman 10:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

For the third time - the image you are trying to add to the Lewis O'Brien (footballer) article is not Lewis O'Brien, it is Jim O'Brien (footballer, born 1987). Your edits are disruptive. GiantSnowman 17:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Reply

Really?I never knew that is what you meant when you talked about it the first time. I am so sorry about that.

Aderiqueza (talk) 17:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC) Can I ask a question please? Why is there picture with another person's name on Commons?(For instance, this Jim O'Brien and Lewis O'Brien)Is there something that can be done?so that this kinda mistake won't happen next time I want to add pictures from Commons to pages. Aderiqueza (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Federal and State Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education in Nigeria

Federal and State Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education in Nigeria is a contest set to help and encourage adept and new editors to participate in creating contents on Federal and State Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education in Nigeria.

The contest participants will focus on writing articles about Federal and State Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education in Nigeria.

The top three winners of the contest will stand a chance of winning the following prizes: 1st prize: Gift Card: $150, 2nd prize: Gift Card: $100 and 3rd prize: Gift Card: $50.

Click here to learn more about the contest and participate

Clarissagum (talk) 21:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chukwudubem Ukaigwe

The article Chukwudubem Ukaigwe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fram (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Osogbo art school moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Osogbo art school, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Atugonza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richard Atugonza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Juwon Aderemi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Juwon Aderemi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Chukwudubem Ukaigwe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chukwudubem Ukaigwe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukwudubem Ukaigwe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vexations (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Aderiqueza! Your additions to Hunger in Nigeria have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Osogbo art school

Hello, Aderiqueza. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Osogbo art school, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

References and punctuation

Thank you for the work being done on adding references to articles. Please remember that punctuation, typically the period in most of the cases in your edits, go before the reference, rather than after, per WP:REFPUNC. Thanks! ChristensenMJ (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Alright,Noted.

Thanks. Aderiqueza (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Osogbo art school

Hello, Aderiqueza. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Osogbo art school".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Madlyn Rhue edit

I am reverting your addition of a citation to Madlyn Rhue. Unfortunately, findagrave.com is not a reliable source for use in Wikipedia citations because it is user-generated. I suggest that you read WP:USERGENERATED for more comments. It lists some other sources that should be avoided for the same reason. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Okay,Noted.

Thanks. Aderiqueza (talk) 06:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Wealthygorilla.com as a reference

Hi Aderiqueza . I noticed that you used wealthygorilla.com as a source for biographical information in Eva Marcille.[2] I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that it meets reliable sourcing criteria for such information. It appears to be a blog. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 20:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Aderiqueza

Thank you for creating National Commission for Persons with Disability.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. You might consider adding "(Nigeria)" to the title

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ummah College of Health Sciences and Technology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ummah College of Health Sciences and Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ummah College of Health Sciences and Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

North8000 (talk) 19:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Federal Government College, Billiri

The article Federal Government College, Billiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Government College, Ganye there is consensus to delete these mass created articles on non notable schools.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 02:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Tamara Aihie

Hello, Aderiqueza, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Tamara Aihie, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Aihie.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Bukunmi Oluwasina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bukunmi Oluwasina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bukunmi Oluwasina (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jimandjam (talk) 11:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seun Oloketuyi (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seun Oloketuyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Aderiqueza! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Tayo Odueke moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tayo Odueke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tayo Odueke (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tayo Odueke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

• The references on the article are sourced from reliable sources
• The article has been improved like you advised
• More independent reference have been added
• The whole content has been improved including editing removal, rewriting and phrasing, and each has sources to back them up. Aderiqueza (talk) 06:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sikiratu Sindodo has been accepted

Sikiratu Sindodo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

R E A D I N G ^{Talk to the Beans?} 09:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, glad to edit,create,make more quality contributions and expand the scope of Wikipedia!! Aderiqueza (talk) 10:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Iyabo Oko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Iyabo Oko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)