Talk:Eric Swalwell: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:59, 8 December 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eric Swalwell article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

California: San Francisco Bay Area B‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Football: American & Canadian B‑class Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

U.S. Congress B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American B‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

A fact from Eric Swalwell appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 November 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that congressman-elect Eric Swalwell served on the city council of College Park, Maryland, while a student at the University of Maryland, College Park?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eric Swalwell.

Wikipedia

More info about presidential run

Why is there so little information about his embarassment of a presidential run? There should be more included, such as the fact that he never managed to achieve even 1% in any national polls. This is the main reason as to why he dropped out, not qualifying for the debate was only a subreason. 2A01:79A:19:F003:757F:DFDE:811:ACC0 (talk) 03:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty simple. He had nothing to make him stand out, little nationwide reputation, and almost nobody was interested in his candidacy. I don't know what else needs to be said. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 00:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added that his polling average was never above 1%. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 00:49, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

@Th78blue and Pulpfiction621: discuss on talk pages before trying to make controversial changes to a WP:BLP involved in post-1992 U.S. politics. Do not add insinuations of what you think Swalwell may have done based on what she did with a couple of Midwestern mayors. Barstool and NY Post are unacceptable sources. And Rand Paul's opinion of Swalwell is as irrelevant to Swalwell's bio as Swalwell's opinion of Paul is to Paul's. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu: The Paul comment is notable and was cited in RS'es. Also, if we do not include barstool or NY Post, fine, but there were several others that I cited too including Forbes and RS'es that should absolutely be included here, as well as an important critical comment made publicly from another senator at the time merits inclusion on this one small sub-section of an entire article. Please do not wholesale revert, but rather make the edits where you deem trimming to be appropriate. I am familiar with the various policies having made nearly 35,000+ edits, so you also do not need to "template" the "regulars"... looks like @Pulpfiction621: also is not new to editing the encyclopedia (7,000+ edits from what I can see). Thank you. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 19:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul would ask for the resignation of an opposite politician because it suits his political purpose, which is pretty standard and hardly noteworthy. Also, unless I'm mistaken, Muboshgu didn't template you or the other user; however, even if they did, an experienced user should know which reliable sources belong in a BLP and which do not (see WP:NYPOST for example). —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you MelbourneStar. I did not template any regulars. Being cited in RS is not enough to establish its importance, and Rand Paul's comments about Swalwell are inconsequential. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How biased is this trash page

I read the bio of Gosar and the Swalwell. Gosar: far right, everything terrible about this guy up front. Swalwell: American politician blah, blah blah. Nothing about extreme leftist views, nothing about false accusations of Russian collusion and his involvement in political slandering. You guys need to get your shit together and at least be equitable. You are the problem causing the great divide in our country. 99.71.206.47 (talk) 12:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ::Paul ''would'' ask for the resignation of an opposite politician because it suits his political purpose, which is pretty standard and hardly noteworthy. Also, unless I'm mistaken, Muboshgu didn't template you or the other  user; however, even if they did, an experienced user should know which reliable sources belong in a BLP and which do not (see [[WP:NYPOST]] for example). —[[User:MelbourneStar|<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b>]]<span style="color: #FF9F00;">☆</span>[[User talk:MelbourneStar|<sup style="color:#407">'''''talk'''''</sup>]] 03:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 :::Thank you {{u|MelbourneStar}}. I did not template any regulars. Being cited in RS is not enough to establish its importance, and Rand Paul's comments about Swalwell are inconsequential. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 23:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
+== How biased is this trash page ==
+I read the bio of Gosar and the Swalwell.  Gosar: far right, everything terrible about this guy up front.  Swalwell: American politician blah, blah blah.  Nothing about extreme leftist views, nothing about false accusations of Russian collusion and his involvement in political slandering.  You guys need to get your shit together and at least be equitable.   You are the problem causing the great divide in our country. [[Special:Contributions/99.71.206.47|99.71.206.47]] ([[User talk:99.71.206.47|talk]]) 12:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)