Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/138 (number): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:53, 17 March 2005

This number is not notable because it is notable. Extreme delete. Thue | talk 14:44, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ah, the good old interesting number paradox. Delete unless anything more can be said. sjorford →•← 15:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Proof that all integers are interesting (and should be kept?):

1 is intersting and notable, OK
Assume k is interesting and notable, need to prove that k+1 is interesting and notable.
If n is interesting and notable, then n+1 is interesting and notable for being one higher than an interesting and notable number.
So k+1 is interesting and notable.
By principle of induction all numbers are interesting and notable, but we do not have space for that unfortunately.
Conclusion: This article should be deleted. Sjakkalle 08:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If this is redone so its along the same lines as 137, I'll vote to keep. There has to be a cut off somewhere, but 138 seems a bit too arbitrary to me. I assume there is a wikiproject for these integer articles, and that would be the best place to discuss where the consecutive numbers should end and where they should start doing only more significant numbers. -R. fiend 15:53, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 #By principle of induction all numbers are interesting and notable, but we do not have space for that unfortunately.
 #Conclusion: This article should be '''deleted'''. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] 08:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*If this is redone so its along the same lines as 137, I'll vote to keep. There has to be a cut off somewhere, but 138 seems a bit too arbitrary to me. I assume there is a wikiproject for these integer articles, and that would be the best place to discuss where the consecutive numbers should end and where they should start doing only more significant numbers. -[[User:R. fiend|R. fiend]] 15:53, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)