Jump to content

Talk:Zaglossus attenboroughi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 45: Line 45:


:I believe you are correct. I'm not entirely sure what to do to get it removed from Commons (though it is obviously a simple step to remove it from the article). It's being used in several other language wikis, so I want to make sure it gets the proper treatment. [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 16:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
:I believe you are correct. I'm not entirely sure what to do to get it removed from Commons (though it is obviously a simple step to remove it from the article). It's being used in several other language wikis, so I want to make sure it gets the proper treatment. [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 16:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

== Requested move 11 November 2023 ==

{{requested move/dated|Zaglossus attenboroughi}}

[[:Sir David's long-beaked echidna]] → {{no redirect|Zaglossus attenboroughi}} – All of the supposed "common names" listed in the lead are not widely used. The titular Sir David's has only been used 3 times [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Sir+David%27s+long-beaked+echidna%22&btnG=]. "Attenborough's long-beaked echidna" has more uses, but has only been used 7 times. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Attenborough%27s+long-beaked+echidna%22&btnG= ], and the cyclops one has only been used twice [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Cyclops+long-beaked+echidna%22&btnG=]. In cases where there is no clear common name, the species name should be preferred. [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 22:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 11 November 2023

WikiProject iconMammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject iconIndonesia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Quick question which I don't have the knowledge to correct; this article says the species is very rare, not seen for many years, and that it is widespread, 'commonest in the mountains' ; this is a bit confusing 78.148.57.143 (talk) 04:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this species named after Sir David Attenborough? If so, it should be noted. Parmesan 18:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See original description here. Ucucha 19:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and note that the article already mentions it. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name

I have seen it referred to as "Attenborough's Long-beaked Echidna", rather than "Sir David's Long-beaked Echidna". Which is correct? 90.192.7.72 13:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We follow Mammal Species of the World (3rd ed 2005) for common names. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nat Geo source on Long-beaked Echidna

It's not clear which, if any, species they are describing in the June 2010 issue

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/2010/06/foja-mountains/white-text

FX (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The description should be moved ~ cygnis insignis 16:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sir David's long-beaked echidna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page image

This species' existence is only known from a specimen from 1961. I'm not sure which species the page image is, but it doesn't match the specimen image further down. 207.228.178.54 (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are correct. I'm not entirely sure what to do to get it removed from Commons (though it is obviously a simple step to remove it from the article). It's being used in several other language wikis, so I want to make sure it gets the proper treatment. UtherSRG (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 November 2023

Sir David's long-beaked echidnaZaglossus attenboroughi – All of the supposed "common names" listed in the lead are not widely used. The titular Sir David's has only been used 3 times [1]. "Attenborough's long-beaked echidna" has more uses, but has only been used 7 times. [2], and the cyclops one has only been used twice [3]. In cases where there is no clear common name, the species name should be preferred. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]