Flat IP: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 2203/3850 |
Edit links |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Flat IP''' architecture provides a way to identify devices using symbolic names, unlike the [[hierarchy|hierarchical]] architecture such as that used in "normal" [[IP address]]es. This form of system is of more interest to mobile broadband network operators. |
'''Flat IP''' architecture provides a way to identify devices using symbolic names, unlike the [[hierarchy|hierarchical]] architecture such as that used in "normal" [[IP address]]es. This form of system is of more interest to mobile [[broadband]] network operators. |
||
==Flat IP architecture== |
==Flat IP architecture== |
||
To meet customer demand for real-time data applications delivered over mobile broadband networks, wireless operators are turning to flat IP network architectures.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The 5th Generation Mobile Wireless Networks- Key Concepts, Network Architecture and Challenges |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274417331}}</ref> |
To meet customer demand for [[real-time data]] applications delivered over mobile broadband networks, wireless operators are turning to flat IP network architectures.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The 5th Generation Mobile Wireless Networks- Key Concepts, Network Architecture and Challenges |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274417331}}</ref> |
||
;The key benefits of flat IP architectures are: |
;The key benefits of flat IP architectures are: |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
;Key players in recognizing these advantages are: |
;Key players in recognizing these advantages are: |
||
*Mobile Networks |
*Mobile Networks |
||
*3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) |
*3rd Generation Partnership Project ([[3GPP]]) |
||
*3GPP2 standards organizations |
*3GPP2 standards organizations |
||
*[[WiMAX]] Forum. |
*[[WiMAX]] Forum. |
||
;Key considerations of Flat IP Architectures for Mobile Networks include: |
;Key considerations of Flat IP Architectures for Mobile Networks include: |
||
Advanced base stations that integrate radio control, header compression, encryption, call admission control, and policy enforcement with IP/Ethernet interfaces. |
Advanced base stations that integrate radio control, header compression, encryption, call admission control, and policy enforcement with IP/[[Ethernet]] interfaces. |
||
Base station routers will provide simpler, lower-latency 3GPP/2 networks. Key emerging players are: [[Alcatel-Lucent]], [[Airvana]], and Ubiquisys. |
Base station routers will provide simpler, lower-latency 3GPP/2 networks. Key emerging players are: [[Alcatel-Lucent]], [[Airvana]], and Ubiquisys. |
||
Revision as of 14:45, 21 February 2023
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Flat IP architecture provides a way to identify devices using symbolic names, unlike the hierarchical architecture such as that used in "normal" IP addresses. This form of system is of more interest to mobile broadband network operators.
Flat IP architecture
To meet customer demand for real-time data applications delivered over mobile broadband networks, wireless operators are turning to flat IP network architectures.[1]
- The key benefits of flat IP architectures are
- lower costs
- reduced system latency
- decoupled radio access and core network evolution
- Key players in recognizing these advantages are
- Mobile Networks
- 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)
- 3GPP2 standards organizations
- WiMAX Forum.
- Key considerations of Flat IP Architectures for Mobile Networks include
Advanced base stations that integrate radio control, header compression, encryption, call admission control, and policy enforcement with IP/Ethernet interfaces. Base station routers will provide simpler, lower-latency 3GPP/2 networks. Key emerging players are: Alcatel-Lucent, Airvana, and Ubiquisys.
For WCDMA networks, the Direct Tunnel Architecture is emerging as the most viable evolution path. Currently, all major vendors support Direct Tunnel, where the SGSN is bypassed on the user plane. Even further advancement is Nokia-Siemens's Internet High-Speed Packet Access ([IHSPA]) architecture which also removes the RNC from the data path, thereby simplifying the architecture and reducing latencies even further.[2]
The WiMax Access Services Network was the first standardized IP-centric mobile network architecture establishing principles now being adopted across the industry. Eventually, HSPA and LTE networks have been chosen by most operators as their preferred network technology.
