Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Colony collapse disorder/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
d |
→Colony collapse disorder: will take some work |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The article has 19 cn tags, at least one failed verification, and is in need of updating (a lot of the science uses 10-yr old sources). [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 19:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC) |
The article has 19 cn tags, at least one failed verification, and is in need of updating (a lot of the science uses 10-yr old sources). [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 19:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delist''' as failing criterion 2 (sourcing) and criterion 3 (broadness, including up-to-date research). [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Delist''' as failing criterion 2 (sourcing) and criterion 3 (broadness, including up-to-date research). [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delist''' as someone involved in the article. I've been sporadically and slowly working on updating the article with scientific reliable sources, but I will admit it is not in a great state right now where I would consider it qualifying for GA. One of the key problems I've run into is people adding in sources on general bee health issues and confusing that with CCD, which has very specific symptoms outlined in the sourced part of [[Colony_collapse_disorder#Signs_and_symptoms]]. Old sources are not inherently bad because a lot of the CCD research and reviews were back from around 10 years ago, and I haven't seen updates recently that showed a major sea-change in anything on the entomology front. Definitely willing to do some heavy lifting on it in a month or two though (or ping me then to give me a little kick). [[User:KoA|KoA]] ([[User talk:KoA|talk]]) 20:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:34, 22 January 2023
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
The article has 19 cn tags, at least one failed verification, and is in need of updating (a lot of the science uses 10-yr old sources). —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist as failing criterion 2 (sourcing) and criterion 3 (broadness, including up-to-date research). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist as someone involved in the article. I've been sporadically and slowly working on updating the article with scientific reliable sources, but I will admit it is not in a great state right now where I would consider it qualifying for GA. One of the key problems I've run into is people adding in sources on general bee health issues and confusing that with CCD, which has very specific symptoms outlined in the sourced part of Colony_collapse_disorder#Signs_and_symptoms. Old sources are not inherently bad because a lot of the CCD research and reviews were back from around 10 years ago, and I haven't seen updates recently that showed a major sea-change in anything on the entomology front. Definitely willing to do some heavy lifting on it in a month or two though (or ping me then to give me a little kick). KoA (talk) 20:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)