User talk:PK650: Difference between revisions
Re Tag: Reverted |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:PK650/Archives/2023/February. (BOT) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|age=96 |
|age=96 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Hg (equity firm) == |
|||
Hello PK650, |
|||
Thank you for checking out my submission for the Hg (equity firm) profile page. I asked: |
|||
· That the quantum of funds under management be changed to “$55B” |
|||
· number of offices be changed to “five”, adding “Paris, France” and “San Francisco, US” |
|||
There has since been a further article published in Reuters that confirms these facts: |
|||
https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/buyout-firm-hg-capital-hires-former-vista-equity-dealmaker-alan-cline-2023-01-31/ |
|||
Would you be willing to make this edit? [[Special:Contributions/31.121.77.36|31.121.77.36]] ([[User talk:31.121.77.36|talk]]) 18:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for providing this source. I have added what the source confirms, but unfortunately some of the items you've requested remain unreferenced. [[User:PK650|PK650]] ([[User talk:PK650#top|talk]]) 23:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks PK650, that's fair. |
|||
::Note there's a reference to the funds under management in the main body too: |
|||
::''In total, Hg has more than $30B funds under management.'' |
|||
::Thanks for taking a look at this [[Special:Contributions/77.102.249.156|77.102.249.156]] ([[User talk:77.102.249.156|talk]]) 17:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::Sorry I missed it. [[User:PK650|PK650]] ([[User talk:PK650#top|talk]]) 10:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Postal Service vs. Post Office == |
== Postal Service vs. Post Office == |
Revision as of 00:19, 16 February 2023
Postal Service vs. Post Office
Hello! I saw your note on the USPS Talk page about building consensus around my proposed Postal Service vs. Post Office edit. I think engaging editors on the topic and letting them talk through it is a good idea. Do you have any suggestions about where I should go to start that kind of discussion? I took a look at that consensus page you linked to, and I'm a little bit unclear on which forums are for discussion and which are for conflict resolution (which doesn't really apply here). Apologies, I'm pretty new to Wikipedia and I'm fearful of wandering into the wrong areas of the site. Don't want to annoy people, or waste their time. Let me know what you think. And thanks for the feedback! Jonathan with U.S. Postal Service (talk) 17:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good question! There's 3 ways I can think of: a request for comment, contacting editors who've worked on the article previously, or posting messages on the WP:USG and WP:PHIL talk pages. Hope this helps! PK650 (talk) 22:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)