User talk:Catalyzzt

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit on 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

How did this https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/394672266358685697/1066603852020850688/Screenshot_20230122-012241.png image end up in your edit here? TylerBurden (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Oops! Thanks for catching this. Looks like an auto-copied Discord link that I accidentally pasted into my edit. Sorry about the confusion. Catalyzzt (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Xunyang River

nothing wrong with my edit, Chaisang don't need space in both pinyin and English, just like there are no space in Xunyang 27.124.38.198 (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. My mistake! Catalyzzt (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

CitroÃĢn

Is it Citroën or CitroÃĢn? Is it a bug with RedWarn? I have seen this gibberish while you were warning 89.197.169.121. 78.177.109.210 (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

@78.177.109.210 RedWarn seems not to be able to parse certain strings of special characters in links. It could also be an issue with MediaWiki. I'll have a look when I get home and report the issue to the 10nm team. Catalyzzt (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Just ignore them

and let them scream into the void. There is no benefit to engaging in a back and forth. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough, I suppose I should WP:Deny recognition. Catalyzzt (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Exactly. If they didn't want attention they wouldn't have pinged a bunch of people. More effective to just ignore them. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

มึงปลอมบัญชีกูทำไม Nongmai21 (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Mock Trial Edits Reverted

Hello, I made two edits to the mock trial page (high school section) which you reverted. I made these edits in good faith, so I apologize if I did not provide descriptive enough context for the edits (I am a novice Wikipedia user). The first edit was to update the list of notable winners of the High School National Championship. The existing paragraph described teams that had won the championship two times in consecutive years. I added a sentence to describe a team which had also won the championship two times, but in years that were far apart. This accomplishment is unique and less common than consecutive victories (and some could argue an even more notable accomplishment). The evidentiary support for the sentence can be found on the National High School Mock Trial Championship page itself, which is the same support used for the other notable winners.

The second edit was not removing any content (as claimed), but instead reorganizing a rather long and jumbled paragraph for clarity. An existing sentence discussed that different states hosted the competition, then there were sentences about notable winners, and then the paragraph returned to the topic of which states hosted the competition. My edit was intended to connect the sentence introducing the concept of rotating hosts with the sentences discussing the details of those rotating hosts. I put this existing content into a new paragraph for ease of reading.

Again, I apologize if I am not following the correct editing etiquette. I just saw that the paragraph was incomplete and disorganized and I thought I would help tidy it up. Respectfully, 24.56.250.13 (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I think I reverted your edits by mistake, sorry! My guess is that your second edit was caught in an ORES filter and flagged as spam. I incorrectly identified the diff as spam, and reverted the edits. I was using a tool called Huggle that speeds up my editing workflow. Reverting an edit using this tool automatically reverts any previous edits by the same user.

If you'd like to restore the edits you made, I'd recommend "merging" the edits to avoid overwriting people who have edited since.

Sincerely sorry for the inconvenience! Catalyzzt (talk) 03:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)