Jump to content

Talk:Waste management: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 115.147.13.80 (talk) to last version by Velella
Waste Management: new section
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 37: Line 37:


"Globally, waste-to-energy accounts for 16% of waste management.<sup>[44]</sup>" I conldn't access to the citation, and couldn't understand the real meaning of the writing, can anybody help? Thanks. [[User:ThomasYehYeh|ThomasYehYeh]] ([[User talk:ThomasYehYeh|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
"Globally, waste-to-energy accounts for 16% of waste management.<sup>[44]</sup>" I conldn't access to the citation, and couldn't understand the real meaning of the writing, can anybody help? Thanks. [[User:ThomasYehYeh|ThomasYehYeh]] ([[User talk:ThomasYehYeh|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

== Waste Management ==

/*Waste Management */new section [[Special:Contributions/2402:8100:2089:4995:0:0:BA56:E488|2402:8100:2089:4995:0:0:BA56:E488]] ([[User talk:2402:8100:2089:4995:0:0:BA56:E488|talk]]) 16:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:33, 4 June 2023

Template:Vital article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Regarza. Peer reviewers: Regarza.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 13 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BruseB, Jrb320.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Review

Overall, the article does capture a general sense of waste management. It has a good structure and outline, but has room for improvement.Regarza (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs a lot of help in citations and references. The citations need to be updated or planned more accordingly. Of the 28 citations in the article, 8 of them the pages cannot be reached or do not work. 2 of the citations also have close paraphrasing/ plagiarism even with a citation which violate Wikipedia’s copyright policies. Citation 1 in the second paragraph of the overview section, should directly link to the definition of waste and should be revised by adding quotation marks or rewording it. Citation 2 does the same and takes a phrase word for word from the citation. Both these citations help define the word waste. Some citations should be added to explain the definition of Incineration specifically in relation to waste disposal since incineration is a general term. Of the remaining citations, the sources seem to be neutral and reliable that come from university articles and scientific journals.Regarza (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The topics of Pyrolysis should be merged to make the section of this type waste disposal more cohesive rather than scattered about in the article. It is first mentioned and defined in the section of “waste handling and transport” then redefined in the section “Re-use” in its own sub heading.Regarza (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I find it rather limited. I'd like to see specific coverage of waste types: plastic (various sub-types), paper etc, electronic and so on. Perhaps we need to review the whole ecosystem of related articles - for instance at the moment 'plastic waste' and 'waste plastic' redirect to 'Plastic pollution', which seems unhelpful, as not all waste becomes pollution.Onanoff (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also find this source having many subtopics, I'll add who waste management effects ecosystems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adebene (talkcontribs) 01:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New editor

Hello, I am a student and I have decided to use this article for my class project. I will be making several edits to this page throughout the semester, and I would love any feedback or insights you guys have for me. Thank you! Yellowduckinc (talk) 00:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am another student and I choose this article for my class project. I will be making edit and adding more reliable sources to help strenthen this article. If you have and feedback or comment about my edit please let me know. Thank you!Adebene (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need elaboration on the following wordings

"Globally, waste-to-energy accounts for 16% of waste management.[44]" I conldn't access to the citation, and couldn't understand the real meaning of the writing, can anybody help? Thanks. ThomasYehYeh (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Waste Management

/*Waste Management */new section 2402:8100:2089:4995:0:0:BA56:E488 (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]