Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kerubis (talk | contribs)
Requesting protection for Tartary
Tartary: Declined – not enough recent disruptive activity (using responseHelper)
Line 41: Line 41:
* {{pagelinks|Tartary}}
* {{pagelinks|Tartary}}
'''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism from conspiracy theorists. Google trends (tartaria) as well as the page views show increased interest. [[User:Kerubis|Kerubis]] ([[User talk:Kerubis|talk]]) 12:52, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
'''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism from conspiracy theorists. Google trends (tartaria) as well as the page views show increased interest. [[User:Kerubis|Kerubis]] ([[User talk:Kerubis|talk]]) 12:52, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Declined''' – Not enough recent disruptive activity to [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|justify]] protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#nact --> [[User:Isabelle Belato|Isabelle Belato]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Isabelle Belato|🏳‍🌈]]</sup></small> 13:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:01, 10 March 2023

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing wars. SecondLooneyaccount (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war by Gary Maas political proponents removing accurate, pertinent, and verified information 121.200.6.242 (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 1keyhole (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: so many blocked users -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The Insurgency in Punjab page has been rewritten a few times into biased tone, and I think it'd be best if it were semi protected, at least temporarily. commemorative (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allow only auto confirmed editors Persistent disruptive editing – Newly created acounts of some users are reverting other editors' edits and they are re adding lots of unsourced information. The vandals are saying (in their talk page) that they will revert it like that again. --Haoreima (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allow only auto confirmed editors Persistent disruptive editing – Newly created acounts are reverting other editors' edits and they are re adding lots of unsourced information. The vandals are saying (in their talk page) that they will revert it like that again. --Haoreima (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poor information including blacklisted sources, and changing of sourced material without discussions. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)12:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from conspiracy theorists. Google trends (tartaria) as well as the page views show increased interest. Kerubis (talk) 12:52, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]