User talk:HandThatFeeds: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Letting Wikipedia down: new section |
LuckyLouie (talk | contribs) →Letting Wikipedia down: advice |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
I’m sorry I don’t understand how you can deal with me like this when the comment was referring to people as loonies, amongst other unsubstantiated derogatory expressions. Can I ask how old you are? I’m 45. My comment was a mature adult responding to the nature of the inappropriate and unhelpful comment above. There is a whole contingent out there dropping these bullying tropes disrespecting others. Your response doesn’t seem to make any sense nor does it seem professional. What difference does it make when that comment was left. It’s still there. It’s still horribly rude and bullying based on total ignorance. There was no speculation on other editors state of mind. There was a statement about what certain behaviours are linked to. I’m completely shocked at your picking on my comment and leaving the one above. I don’t see what value you think you’re bringing here. You’re just trying to silence people and support bullies. It’s wrong. [[User:Mcnaugha|Mcnaugha]] ([[User talk:Mcnaugha|talk]]) 15:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC) |
I’m sorry I don’t understand how you can deal with me like this when the comment was referring to people as loonies, amongst other unsubstantiated derogatory expressions. Can I ask how old you are? I’m 45. My comment was a mature adult responding to the nature of the inappropriate and unhelpful comment above. There is a whole contingent out there dropping these bullying tropes disrespecting others. Your response doesn’t seem to make any sense nor does it seem professional. What difference does it make when that comment was left. It’s still there. It’s still horribly rude and bullying based on total ignorance. There was no speculation on other editors state of mind. There was a statement about what certain behaviours are linked to. I’m completely shocked at your picking on my comment and leaving the one above. I don’t see what value you think you’re bringing here. You’re just trying to silence people and support bullies. It’s wrong. [[User:Mcnaugha|Mcnaugha]] ([[User talk:Mcnaugha|talk]]) 15:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
:{{stalker}} On Wikipedia, it's OK to criticize '''sources''' as part of a discussion about [[WP:TALK|how best to improve the article]] or which potential sources qualify as [[WP:RS|reliable]] or unreliable based on our policies. This is especially important in the case of articles about [[WP:FRINGE]] subjects where evaluating the mainstream position vs the fringe position requires a fair amount of input from experienced editors. So criticizing sources, e.g. www.thunderbolts.info, Worlds In Collision, Chariots Of The Gods, etc., as part of a discussion is OK. But it's not OK to criticize the personality of other editors, e.g. calling them a bully who suffers from insecurity and phobia. That is a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]]. [[User:LuckyLouie|- LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie|talk]]) 16:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:07, 7 May 2023
| This is HandThatFeeds's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
|
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 | HandThatFeeds is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Cool Profile
Just passing by to say that I love the Nine Inch Nails themed user profile. Have a nice day. Catlemur (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| Thank you for closing the large fight on Talk:2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania. |
- You're very welcome! — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 20:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Letting Wikipedia down
I’m sorry I don’t understand how you can deal with me like this when the comment was referring to people as loonies, amongst other unsubstantiated derogatory expressions. Can I ask how old you are? I’m 45. My comment was a mature adult responding to the nature of the inappropriate and unhelpful comment above. There is a whole contingent out there dropping these bullying tropes disrespecting others. Your response doesn’t seem to make any sense nor does it seem professional. What difference does it make when that comment was left. It’s still there. It’s still horribly rude and bullying based on total ignorance. There was no speculation on other editors state of mind. There was a statement about what certain behaviours are linked to. I’m completely shocked at your picking on my comment and leaving the one above. I don’t see what value you think you’re bringing here. You’re just trying to silence people and support bullies. It’s wrong. Mcnaugha (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) On Wikipedia, it's OK to criticize sources as part of a discussion about how best to improve the article or which potential sources qualify as reliable or unreliable based on our policies. This is especially important in the case of articles about WP:FRINGE subjects where evaluating the mainstream position vs the fringe position requires a fair amount of input from experienced editors. So criticizing sources, e.g. www.thunderbolts.info, Worlds In Collision, Chariots Of The Gods, etc., as part of a discussion is OK. But it's not OK to criticize the personality of other editors, e.g. calling them a bully who suffers from insecurity and phobia. That is a personal attack. - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)