Talk:Year: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Year/Archive 1) (bot |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|archive = Talk:Year/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Year/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Perfect == |
|||
The short article under "Abbreviations for "years ago" is perfect - thank You!!" - however, regrettably too less known by those linguistically incompetent geologists.[[Special:Contributions/2A02:8108:9640:AC3:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71|2A02:8108:9640:AC3:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71]] ([[User talk:2A02:8108:9640:AC3:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71|talk]]) 06:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2022 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|Year|answered=yes}} |
|||
Change Hegira to Hijrah [[User:اخسجہ|اخسجہ]] ([[User talk:اخسجہ|talk]]) 12:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Comment''': makes sense, given that the relevant article is [[Hijrah]] not Hegira. --[[User:John Maynard Friedman|John Maynard Friedman]] ([[User talk:John Maynard Friedman|talk]]) 12:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{done}} after checking histories and finding [[Talk:Hijrah#Requested move 9 February 2022]]. Copy-edited to avoid starting with "The Islamic Anno Hegirae" as if the Latin name were Islamic. [[User:NebY|NebY]] ([[User talk:NebY|talk]]) 15:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Baggaet|Baggaet]] ([[User talk:Baggaet|talk]]) 17:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Colloquial use of word "sees" == |
== Colloquial use of word "sees" == |
||
Revision as of 00:16, 29 May 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Year article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colloquial use of word "sees"
The article is copy protected, I can't make even a minor edit. First paragraph: " the course of a year sees the passing of the seasons". The course of a year doesn't have eyes; it can't see anything. There are perfectly good, non-figurative words that can be used instead of "sees". How about "features"? 2604:2000:2FC0:F:E123:5FF5:2949:5DEF (talk) 01:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- A reasonable comment but "features" isn't exactly an improvement: it refers to a single event. My first idea was "marks" but no: maybe the months mark the passing of the seasons but not the whole year. Anyone else? Meanwhile, "sees" is inoffensive. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
The orbital period is mentioned but not given for comparison
it would be nice to have the actual number for the orbital period (365.2422) when it is mentioned to compare to the 400 year average approximation of 365.2425. Also, add citation https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/Numbers/Math/Mathematical_Thinking/calendar_calculations.htm Zectbumo (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Actual number in which year? The whole point of taking a 400 year average is to even out the occasional tiny gravitational ripples that affect the seventh significant digit. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- The Year#Astronomical tears section gives several "actual numbers" for various kinds of years. The calendar was designed to approximate the tropical year, which is not what astronomers would call an "orbital period". The orbital period is also known as the anomalistic year. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- We provide many comparative figures, such as in Year#Julian calendar, Year#Gregorian calendar and Year#Sidereal, tropical, and anomalistic years, plus a comparative table at Year#Summary. I fear any more repetition would risk wearying the reader, or even perplexing them (Why am I being told this again? Is it somehow different from the last time I was told it?).
- For which particular statement in the article should we add that citation? At first glance everything we say is already fairly clearly supported by our references. NebY (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- the citation at www.grc.nasa.gov suggested by Zectbumo is a NASA educational website and is less precise and less rigorous than the other references included in the article. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)