Jump to content

Commission on Unalienable Rights: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Makermark (talk | contribs)
313 edits
m →Creation and mission: Minor punctuation changes
Makermark (talk | contribs)
313 edits
m →Support: minor word and punctuation corrections
Line 44: Line 44:
Human rights activist [[Aaron Rhodes]], the former executive director of the [[International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights]], wrote that "Secretary of State Mike Pompeo deserves praise for proposing an Unalienable Rights Commission to help guide American human-rights policy" and that the State Department was accurate in naming [[natural law]] and [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]] as "the core foundational principles of human rights".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rhodes|first=Aaron|date=10 June 2019|title=Pompeo Tries to Rescue the Idea of Human Rights|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/pompeo-tries-to-rescue-the-idea-of-human-rights-11560207792|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref>
Human rights activist [[Aaron Rhodes]], the former executive director of the [[International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights]], wrote that "Secretary of State Mike Pompeo deserves praise for proposing an Unalienable Rights Commission to help guide American human-rights policy" and that the State Department was accurate in naming [[natural law]] and [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]] as "the core foundational principles of human rights".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rhodes|first=Aaron|date=10 June 2019|title=Pompeo Tries to Rescue the Idea of Human Rights|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/pompeo-tries-to-rescue-the-idea-of-human-rights-11560207792|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref>


[[Walter Russell Mead]], founder of center-left think tank [[New America (organization)|New America]], wrote in ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' that the commission's report was "a thoughtful and carefully reasoned document that may serve as an important landmark in future debates".<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|last=Mead|first=Walter Russell|date=16 July 2020|title=Pompeo Takes On the Politicization of Human Rights|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/pompeo-takes-on-the-politicization-of-human-rights-11594919689|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref> He added that the commission's "approach offers more opportunity for constructive diplomacy" than approach sought by "many contemporary activists".<ref name=":0" />
[[Walter Russell Mead]], founder of center-left think tank [[New America (organization)|New America]], wrote in ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' that the commission's report was "a thoughtful and carefully reasoned document that may serve as an important landmark in future debates".<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|last=Mead|first=Walter Russell|date=16 July 2020|title=Pompeo Takes On the Politicization of Human Rights|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/pompeo-takes-on-the-politicization-of-human-rights-11594919689|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref> He added that the commission's "approach offers more opportunity for constructive diplomacy" than some approaches sought by "many contemporary activists".<ref name=":0" />


In July 2020, the editorial board of ''The Wall Street Journal'' issued an editorial in support of the commission's report.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|last=Editorial Board|first=|date=19 July 2020|title=The left's rights distortions|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-lefts-rights-distortions-11595192369|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref> The board wrote that the report was fair and historically accurate, noting that the report "discusses at length the way the U.S. failed to live up to its founding promise of unalienable rights—most significantly with slavery and the Jim Crow era—and emphasizes that U.S. credibility in promoting human rights abroad depends on America’s example at home."<ref name=":1" /> The board added that "Mr. Pompeo’s initiative is not the coded theocratic or authoritarian document of his critics’ partisan imaginations", but instead "a sensible effort to put American human-rights diplomacy on more sustainable footing."<ref name=":1" />
In July 2020, the editorial board of ''The Wall Street Journal'' issued an editorial in support of the commission's report.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|last=Editorial Board|first=|date=19 July 2020|title=The left's rights distortions|work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-lefts-rights-distortions-11595192369|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref> The board wrote that the report was fair and historically accurate, noting that the report "discusses at length the way the U.S. failed to live up to its founding promise of unalienable rights—most significantly with slavery and the Jim Crow era—and emphasizes that U.S. credibility in promoting human rights abroad depends on America’s example at home."<ref name=":1" /> The board added that "Mr. Pompeo’s initiative is not the coded theocratic or authoritarian document of his critics’ partisan imaginations", but instead "a sensible effort to put American human-rights diplomacy on a more sustainable footing."<ref name=":1" />


In December 2020, [[Nahdlatul Ulama]], the world's largest<ref>{{Cite news|last=Winn|first=Patrick|date=8 March 2019|title=The world’s largest Islamic group wants Muslims to stop saying 'infidel'|work=[[Public Radio Exchange|PRI]]|url=https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-03-08/world-s-largest-islamic-group-wants-muslims-stop-saying-infidel|url-status=live|quote=The largest Islamic organization on the planet has a request for all Muslims. Quit calling people kafir, an Arabic word for infidels or nonbelievers.}}</ref> independent [[Muslims|Muslim]] organization, sent Pompeo a letter stating that the organization has "unreservedly embraced the Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights" and that the report constitutes a "re-affirmation of the spirit and substance of fundamental human rights".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Berkowitz|first=Peter|last2=Glendon|first2=Mary Ann|date=7 January 2021|title=Commission on Unalienable Rights: Lessons Learned|work=[[RealClearPolitics|RealClearWorld]]|url=https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2021/01/07/commission_on_unalienable_rights_lessons_learned_655765.html|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref>
In December 2020, [[Nahdlatul Ulama]], the world's largest<ref>{{Cite news|last=Winn|first=Patrick|date=8 March 2019|title=The world’s largest Islamic group wants Muslims to stop saying 'infidel'|work=[[Public Radio Exchange|PRI]]|url=https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-03-08/world-s-largest-islamic-group-wants-muslims-stop-saying-infidel|url-status=live|quote=The largest Islamic organization on the planet has a request for all Muslims. Quit calling people kafir, an Arabic word for infidels or nonbelievers.}}</ref> independent [[Muslims|Muslim]] organization, sent Pompeo a letter stating that the organization has "unreservedly embraced the Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights" and that the report constitutes a "re-affirmation of the spirit and substance of fundamental human rights".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Berkowitz|first=Peter|last2=Glendon|first2=Mary Ann|date=7 January 2021|title=Commission on Unalienable Rights: Lessons Learned|work=[[RealClearPolitics|RealClearWorld]]|url=https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2021/01/07/commission_on_unalienable_rights_lessons_learned_655765.html|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref>

Revision as of 14:13, 16 June 2023

Rights
Theoretical distinctions
Human rights
Rights by beneficiary
Other groups of rights

The Commission on Unalienable Rights was a commission created under the U.S. State Department in July 2019. It released its final report in August 2020.

History

Background

In July 2018, the State Department hosted its first annual Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom. At a Heritage Foundation panel discussion, the Christian conservative attorney Benjamin Bull claimed that the left-wing was using “newly manufactured human rights" (an apparent reference to LGBTQ-related rights) to "crush” the “traditional” and “natural" rights recognized by Christians.[1]

Creation and mission

On May 30, 2019, the State Department announced its intention to create the commission. The announcement was published in the Federal Register and stated that the commission's purpose was to "provide the Secretary of State advice and recommendations concerning international human rights matters" along with "fresh thinking about human rights discourse where such discourse has departed from our nation's founding principles of natural law and natural rights."[2]

On June 28, 2019, it was reported that Robert P. George, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, was involved with the planning of the commission.[3]

On July 7, 2019, then Secretary of State Pompeo published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal explaining the commission's intended focus. He said that "universal," "unalienable" rights must be distinguished from "ad hoc rights granted by governments." Modern references to "new categories of rights", per Pompeo, aim at "rewarding interest groups and dividing humanity into subgroups." He warned that "loose talk of 'rights' unmoors us from the principles of liberal democracy." Pompeo described that the commission was expected to generate debate over philosophical questions such as: "What are our fundamental freedoms? Why do we have them? Who or what grants these rights? How do we know if a claim of human rights is true? What happens when rights conflict? Should certain categories of rights be inextricably 'linked' to other rights?" The commission was to be designated as an advisory body, rather than as a policy-making body.[4]

The commission's creation was announced on July 8, 2019.[5][6] According to Pompeo, the mission of the commission was to offer "advice on human rights grounded in our nation's founding principles and the principles of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights".[7]

The following day, State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus gave a press briefing in which she explained that "authoritarian regimes [are] subverting this human rights context" and claimed that the U.N. Human Rights Commission had become "a laughingstock." She added that the new commission would not be "partisan" and did not intend to "create new policy on human rights."[8] She also mentioned that Sam Brownback, the U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, had recently produced an International Religious Freedom Report.[9]

Report

The commission released its draft report on July 16, 2020.[10][11][12][13] It released its final report on August 26, 2020.[14]

Members

As initially announced on July 8, 2019, the commission had 12 members, including eight men and four women.[15]

The chairperson was Mary Ann Glendon, a former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican who now teaches at Harvard Law School. The rapporteur is F. Cartwright Weiland, who works at the State Department. Kiron Skinner was named as the head of the executive secretary, but she lost her State Department job several weeks later.[16]

The other members are:

Reactions

Support

Human rights activist Aaron Rhodes, the former executive director of the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, wrote that "Secretary of State Mike Pompeo deserves praise for proposing an Unalienable Rights Commission to help guide American human-rights policy" and that the State Department was accurate in naming natural law and natural rights as "the core foundational principles of human rights".[17]

Walter Russell Mead, founder of center-left think tank New America, wrote in The Wall Street Journal that the commission's report was "a thoughtful and carefully reasoned document that may serve as an important landmark in future debates".[18] He added that the commission's "approach offers more opportunity for constructive diplomacy" than some approaches sought by "many contemporary activists".[18]

In July 2020, the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal issued an editorial in support of the commission's report.[19] The board wrote that the report was fair and historically accurate, noting that the report "discusses at length the way the U.S. failed to live up to its founding promise of unalienable rights—most significantly with slavery and the Jim Crow era—and emphasizes that U.S. credibility in promoting human rights abroad depends on America’s example at home."[19] The board added that "Mr. Pompeo’s initiative is not the coded theocratic or authoritarian document of his critics’ partisan imaginations", but instead "a sensible effort to put American human-rights diplomacy on a more sustainable footing."[19]

In December 2020, Nahdlatul Ulama, the world's largest[20] independent Muslim organization, sent Pompeo a letter stating that the organization has "unreservedly embraced the Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights" and that the report constitutes a "re-affirmation of the spirit and substance of fundamental human rights".[21]

Criticism

GLAAD, an LGBTQ rights organization, found that seven members of the commission had made anti-LGBTQ remarks in the past.[22] Joanne Lin, national director of advocacy and government affairs at the human rights organization Amnesty International USA, says that this commission "appears to be an attempt to further hateful policies aimed at women and LGBTQ people."[23] Roger Pilon, chair of Constitutional Studies for the Cato Institute, wrote that, "the distinction between natural law, especially if theologically based, and natural rights to liberty looms large".[24]

On June 12, 2019, Senators Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), and Chris Coons (D-Del.) wrote to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to "express our deep concern with the process and intent behind the Department of State’s recently announced Commission on Unalienable Rights...With deep reservations about the Commission, we request that you not take any further action regarding its membership or proposed operations without first consulting with congressional oversight and appropriations committees."[25] On June 13, 2019, the U.S. House debated an en bloc amendment which included a provision to defund the Commission.[26][27][28] On June 18, 2019, the U.S. House voted 231–187 in favor of the en bloc amendment.[29][30][31] Not long after the establishment of the Commission major human rights organizations warned that the Commission could cause significant harm to the global human rights system.[32] In May 2020, 167 rights advocates and organizations from 28 different countries put out a statement expressing "grave concern" about the direction of the Commission and urged it to "reject the prioritization of freedom of religion as a cloak to permit violations of the human rights of women, girls, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people."[33]

After the release of the commission's final report, former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Rori Kramer criticized the commission and in an interview with The Guardian, saying that "[f]rom day one when Pompeo announced this, the intention was always to change the actual working policy of the department to fit his narrow religious views in a way that really upends the normal working order of the department."[34] Miguel H. Díaz, former United States Ambassador to the Holy See joined by 125 Catholic theologians and leaders, signed a public petition which, among other things, expresses concern that the Commission's composition indicated that it was poised to lead to policies that will "harm people who are already vulnerable, especially poor women, children, LGBTI people, immigrants, refugees, and those in need of reproductive health services."[35]

In addition to political leaders and human rights organizations, the Commission's report saw opposition from a large number of human rights advocates and scholars. Notable ones include Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch, who described the Commission's report as "a frontal assault on international human rights law."[36] Gerald L. Neuman, Director of the Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School and a former member of the United Nations Human Rights Committee, who had previously submitted formal comments to the Commission outlining its defects,[37] was joined by Martha Minow (former Dean of Harvard Law School), Mathias Risse (Director of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard University), and Katharine Young (Professor of Law at Boston College Law School) in criticizing the report.[38] Gerald L. Neuman[39] and Katharine Young[40] also published more extensive academic contributions in connection with the report and related topics.

See also

References

  1. ^ Posner, Sarah (2020). Unholy: Why White Evangelicals Worship at the Altar of Donald Trump. Random House. ISBN 9781984820426.
  2. ^ "Federal Register: Department of State Commission on Unalienable Rights". web.archive.org. May 30, 2019. Archived from the original on July 10, 2019. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  3. ^ Pilon, Roger (June 3, 2019). "Natural Law, Gay Rights, and the State Department's New Commission on Unalienable Rights". Cato Institute. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  4. ^ Pompeo, Michael R. (July 7, 2019). "Opinion | Unalienable Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  5. ^ "Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo Remarks to the Press". United States Department of State. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  6. ^ Tucker, Eric (July 8, 2019). "WATCH: Secretary of State Pompeo unveils creation of human rights commission". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  7. ^ Brown, Lauretta (July 13, 2019). "Pompeo Launches New 'Commission on Unalienable Rights'". National Catholic Register.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  8. ^ "Department Press Briefing – July 9, 2019". United States Department of State. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  9. ^ "2018 Report on International Religious Freedom". United States Department of State. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  10. ^ "Pompeo claims private property and religious freedom are 'foremost' human rights". the Guardian. July 16, 2020.
  11. ^ "'American way of life is under attack,' says Pompeo as he unveils rights report". UPI.
  12. ^ Verma, Pranshu (July 16, 2020). "Pompeo Says Human Rights Policy Must Prioritize Property Rights and Religion" – via NYTimes.com.
  13. ^ "Pompeo says US should limit which human rights it defends". AP NEWS. July 16, 2020.
  14. ^ "Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights" (PDF). U.S. Department of State. August 26, 2020. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  15. ^ Weinberg, Justin (July 11, 2019). "Philosopher Named to New State Dept. Commission on Unalienable Rights". Daily Nous. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  16. ^ Sanger, David E.; Haberman, Maggie; Wong, Edward (August 2, 2019). "State Dept. Officials Force Out Top Policy Planner and Adviser to Mike Pompeo". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 6, 2020.
  17. ^ Rhodes, Aaron (June 10, 2019). "Pompeo Tries to Rescue the Idea of Human Rights". The Wall Street Journal.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. ^ a b Mead, Walter Russell (July 16, 2020). "Pompeo Takes On the Politicization of Human Rights". The Wall Street Journal.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  19. ^ a b c Editorial Board (July 19, 2020). "The left's rights distortions". The Wall Street Journal.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  20. ^ Winn, Patrick (March 8, 2019). "The world's largest Islamic group wants Muslims to stop saying 'infidel'". PRI. The largest Islamic organization on the planet has a request for all Muslims. Quit calling people kafir, an Arabic word for infidels or nonbelievers.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  21. ^ Berkowitz, Peter; Glendon, Mary Ann (January 7, 2021). "Commission on Unalienable Rights: Lessons Learned". RealClearWorld.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  22. ^ "GLAAD Issues New Report on Anti-LGBTQ Activists Leading State Department's New "Commission on Unalienable Rights"". GLAAD. July 9, 2019. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  23. ^ "Trump Administration Commission on Unalienable Rights Politicizes Human Rights for Hate". Amnesty International USA. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  24. ^ Pilon, Roger (June 13, 2019). "Making Sense of the State Department's New Commission on Unalienable Rights (Originally published in the Washington Examiner)". Cato Institute. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  25. ^ "Menendez, Leahy, Durbin, Shaheen, Coons Raise Alarm over Trump Administration's Plans to Redefine Human Rights through New Commission | United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations". U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. June 12, 2019. Retrieved July 13, 2019.
  26. ^ "Daily Digest, June 13, 2019". Congressional Record. June 13, 2019. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  27. ^ "Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2020; Congressional Record Vol. 165, no. 99". Congressional Record. June 13, 2019. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  28. ^ "H.Amdt. 348 to H.R. 2740". Congress.gov. June 13, 2019. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  29. ^ "Daily Digest, June 18, 2019". Congressional Record. June 18, 2019. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  30. ^ "H.Amdt. 348 Actions". Congress.gov. June 13, 2019. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  31. ^ "House Roll Call 232 on Lowey of New York Part B Amendment En Bloc No. 1". Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. June 18, 2019. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  32. ^ Hansler, Jennifer (March 6, 2020). "Human rights organizations file suit over Pompeo's 'unalienable rights' commission | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  33. ^ "Groups Express Grave Concern about the Commission on Unalienable Rights". Human Rights Watch. May 1, 2020. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  34. ^ "US reframing of human rights harms women and LGBT people, advocates say". The Guardian. September 17, 2020.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  35. ^ "Catholic Leaders Call for State Department Commission to be Dismantled". DignityUSA. Retrieved July 16, 2022.
  36. ^ "Pompeo's Commission on Unalienable Rights Will Endanger Everyone's Human Rights". Human Rights Watch. August 27, 2020. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  37. ^ "Gerald Neuman submits comments to State Department's "Commission on Unalienable Rights"". Human Rights @ Harvard Law. March 23, 2020. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  38. ^ "WATCH: Pompeo's "Commission on Unalienable Rights": Shrinking U.S. Human Rights Policy". Human Rights @ Harvard Law. October 5, 2020. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  39. ^ Neuman, Gerald (2020). Human Rights in a Time of Populism: Challenges and Responses. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108751551.
  40. ^ Young, Katharine. "Human Rights Originalism". Georgetown Law Journal. 110.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Commission_on_Unalienable_Rights&oldid=1160444078"