Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supremacy 1914 (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
delete |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*:'''Delete''' I think it's been relaunched on mobile, there are some sources for that, but nothing in RS we'd use for gaming articles. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 00:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
*:'''Delete''' I think it's been relaunched on mobile, there are some sources for that, but nothing in RS we'd use for gaming articles. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 00:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete and salt''' Game fails the Metacritic test and is just as non-notable now as it was in the first AfD, with a total lack of reliable sources. [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 03:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Delete and salt''' Game fails the Metacritic test and is just as non-notable now as it was in the first AfD, with a total lack of reliable sources. [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 03:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Fails [[WP:GNG]] due to lack of coverage in reliable, secondary sources. [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 12:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:53, 17 July 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Supremacy 1914 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There has been issues with notability for a good while. Citation 1 and 3 seem to be linked to the subject. Citation 2 won't open. They use a lot of puffery and seem to let you play the game. Citation 4 also seems to be selling the game to some extent. Citation 5 does not look reliable and looking up Game Genetics leads to nothing. Citation 6 seems to be the most independent but look suspiciously similar to 4. Citation 7 is dead. Citation 8 is a forum. Citation 9 is independent though I have doubts on how reliable it is. Citations 10 and 11 look to either be online arcades or mods for the game. Citation 12 is the website. Being most optimistic, it barely passes wp:N ✶Mitch199811✶ 23:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ✶Mitch199811✶ 23:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I think it's been relaunched on mobile, there are some sources for that, but nothing in RS we'd use for gaming articles. Oaktree b (talk) 00:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and salt Game fails the Metacritic test and is just as non-notable now as it was in the first AfD, with a total lack of reliable sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Woodroar (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC)