Jump to content

Weeping crucifix in Mumbai: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
combined identical references. top: added link. removed nonsense. changed link anchor for cleanness. Aftermath: removed duplicate link
m top: clean up excess link-scraping content, removed: - Living News, Firstpost
Line 36: Line 36:
}}
}}


The '''Weeping crucifix in Mumbai''' is a [[crucifix|statue of the crucified Jesus]] in [[Mumbai]] which attracted widespread attention in 2012 when a constant stream of water began to seep from its feet. Some of the local Catholic faithful believed the incident to be a [[Miracle#Christianity|miracle]]; however, the skeptic-rationalist author [[Sanal Edamaruku]] provided evidence that the water stemmed from a faulty sewage system, which seeped due to [[capillary force|capillary action]]. However, Edamaruku also accused [[Latin Christian]] priests of regularly [[scam]]ming devotees and [[defrauding]] miracles to make money, and build bigger and newer churches or convents,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Water-from-the-cross-of-Irla.-Indian-atheist-accuses-Church-of-manufacturing-miracles-for-money-24218.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112002757/http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Water-from-the-cross-of-Irla.-Indian-atheist-accuses-Church-of-manufacturing-miracles-for-money-24218.html|archive-date=2020-11-12|title=Water from the cross of Irla. Indian atheist accuses Church of}}</ref> and [[Anti-Papalism|mocked the Pope as "anti-science"]].<ref name="firstpost.com">{{Cite web|url=https://www.firstpost.com/living/why-jesus-wept-in-mumbai-the-church-versus-the-rationalist-538657.html/amp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925151330/https://www.firstpost.com/living/why-jesus-wept-in-mumbai-the-church-versus-the-rationalist-538657.html/amp|archive-date=2019-09-25|title=Why Jesus wept in Mumbai: The church versus the rationalist - Living News, Firstpost}}</ref> A church representative admitted Edamaruku had the "right to doubt", and Christian activists said that the backlash was not for debunking the alleged "miracle" but for the [[defamatory]] statements made live on television.<ref name="firstpost.com"/> After which he became subsequently subject to multiple [[first information report]]s (FIR) under blasphemy laws.<ref>{{cite AV media|title=A Rationalist Fights to Disprove Miracles in India|date=23 Nov 2012|publisher=Public Radio International|medium=Audio file}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.firstpost.com/living/blasphemy-law-is-unworthy-of-secular-democracy-rationalist-edamaruku-544365.html|title=Blasphemy law is unworthy of secular democracy|website=Firstpost|date=4 December 2012|access-date=2019-10-27}}</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thesundayindian.com/en/story/withdraw-case-against-sanal/24/37573/|title=Withdraw case against Sanal – John Dayal, Veteran journalist and member, National Integration Council – The Sunday Indian|website=www.thesundayindian.com|access-date=2019-10-27}}</ref> A Catholic lawyer and the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Bombay]] called for him to apologise for the comments. {{Citation needed span|After receiving a barrage of threats,|date=August 2021}} he migrated to [[Finland]] to avoid being arrested under the [[blasphemy law]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/rampal-is-a-fraudster-who-exploits-the-gullible-common-man/story-UZjFWR9oe5WOLKU1BpJ6hK.html|title='Rampal is a fraudster who exploits the gullible common man'|date=19 November 2014|newspaper=Hindustan Times|accessdate=6 February 2023}}</ref>
The '''Weeping crucifix in Mumbai''' is a [[crucifix|statue of the crucified Jesus]] in [[Mumbai]] which attracted widespread attention in 2012 when a constant stream of water began to seep from its feet. Some of the local Catholic faithful believed the incident to be a [[Miracle#Christianity|miracle]]; however, the skeptic-rationalist author [[Sanal Edamaruku]] provided evidence that the water stemmed from a faulty sewage system, which seeped due to [[capillary force|capillary action]]. However, Edamaruku also accused [[Latin Christian]] priests of regularly [[scam]]ming devotees and [[defrauding]] miracles to make money, and build bigger and newer churches or convents,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Water-from-the-cross-of-Irla.-Indian-atheist-accuses-Church-of-manufacturing-miracles-for-money-24218.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112002757/http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Water-from-the-cross-of-Irla.-Indian-atheist-accuses-Church-of-manufacturing-miracles-for-money-24218.html|archive-date=2020-11-12|title=Water from the cross of Irla. Indian atheist accuses Church of}}</ref> and [[Anti-Papalism|mocked the Pope as "anti-science"]].<ref name="firstpost.com">{{Cite web|url=https://www.firstpost.com/living/why-jesus-wept-in-mumbai-the-church-versus-the-rationalist-538657.html/amp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925151330/https://www.firstpost.com/living/why-jesus-wept-in-mumbai-the-church-versus-the-rationalist-538657.html/amp|archive-date=2019-09-25|title=Why Jesus wept in Mumbai: The church versus the rationalist }}</ref> A church representative admitted Edamaruku had the "right to doubt", and Christian activists said that the backlash was not for debunking the alleged "miracle" but for the [[defamatory]] statements made live on television.<ref name="firstpost.com"/> After which he became subsequently subject to multiple [[first information report]]s (FIR) under blasphemy laws.<ref>{{cite AV media|title=A Rationalist Fights to Disprove Miracles in India|date=23 Nov 2012|publisher=Public Radio International|medium=Audio file}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.firstpost.com/living/blasphemy-law-is-unworthy-of-secular-democracy-rationalist-edamaruku-544365.html|title=Blasphemy law is unworthy of secular democracy|website=Firstpost|date=4 December 2012|access-date=2019-10-27}}</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thesundayindian.com/en/story/withdraw-case-against-sanal/24/37573/|title=Withdraw case against Sanal – John Dayal, Veteran journalist and member, National Integration Council – The Sunday Indian|website=www.thesundayindian.com|access-date=2019-10-27}}</ref> A Catholic lawyer and the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Bombay]] called for him to apologise for the comments. {{Citation needed span|After receiving a barrage of threats,|date=August 2021}} he migrated to [[Finland]] to avoid being arrested under the [[blasphemy law]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/rampal-is-a-fraudster-who-exploits-the-gullible-common-man/story-UZjFWR9oe5WOLKU1BpJ6hK.html|title='Rampal is a fraudster who exploits the gullible common man'|date=19 November 2014|newspaper=Hindustan Times|accessdate=6 February 2023}}</ref>



== Phenomenon ==
== Phenomenon ==

Revision as of 18:45, 2 September 2023

Weeping crucifix in Mumbai
LocationMumbai, India
MaterialWood

The Weeping crucifix in Mumbai is a statue of the crucified Jesus in Mumbai which attracted widespread attention in 2012 when a constant stream of water began to seep from its feet. Some of the local Catholic faithful believed the incident to be a miracle; however, the skeptic-rationalist author Sanal Edamaruku provided evidence that the water stemmed from a faulty sewage system, which seeped due to capillary action. However, Edamaruku also accused Latin Christian priests of regularly scamming devotees and defrauding miracles to make money, and build bigger and newer churches or convents,[1] and mocked the Pope as "anti-science".[2] A church representative admitted Edamaruku had the "right to doubt", and Christian activists said that the backlash was not for debunking the alleged "miracle" but for the defamatory statements made live on television.[2] After which he became subsequently subject to multiple first information reports (FIR) under blasphemy laws.[3][4][5][6] A Catholic lawyer and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Bombay called for him to apologise for the comments. After receiving a barrage of threats,[citation needed] he migrated to Finland to avoid being arrested under the blasphemy law.[7]

Phenomenon

On 5 March 2012, the feet of a statue of a crucified Jesus in Irla near to the Church of Our Lady of Velankanni (Mumbai) started dripping water and was discovered by a woman who reported it to the local parish priest; the dripping stopped on 8 March. The parish priest of the church, Augustine Palett, stated "whether science can explain what happened or not, a miracle did occur in Irla, namely that of having dozens of Christians, Hindus and Muslims pray together under the cross."[8]

On 12 March, Agnelo Gracias, the auxiliary bishop of Mumbai, stated: "One can doubt if this has a supernatural cause. I have not seen the cross yet. It is quite possible that water dripping from it may have a natural explanation."[9]

Scientific explanation

The Indian rationalist Sanal Edamaruku was invited to investigate by TV9 of Mumbai with the consent of the church authorities. He went with an engineer to the site where the alleged miracle had happened, and traced the source of the drip to the rear side. Edamaruku found that the water was seeping through the feet because of capillary action and faulty plumbing.[10][11] Moisture on the wall where the statue was mounted seemed to be coming from an overflowing drain, which was in turn fed by a pipe that issued from a nearby toilet.[5]

In a debate on TV9, Bishop Agnelo Gracias from Mumbai said, "We will never say it is a miracle. The church will investigate and investigate very carefully." He said it was possible this particular incident had "natural causes" and agreed that Edamaruku has a "right to doubt."[12]

Aftermath

After Edamaruku's televised comments mocking the Catholic Church and the Pope, Catholic Secular Forum filed 17 first information reports against Edamaruku under IPC section 295-A, a blasphemy law of India.[12][13] The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Mumbai was not involved with the criminal charges, but issued a statement asking for his apology and for the prosecution to drop the charges. The All India Catholic Union said the law was being applied incorrectly.[14] Colin Gonsalves, the founder of the India Center for Human Rights and Law, stated his opinion that no criminal offence had been committed.[15] There were further complaints that the law was being misused to suppress free speech. Vishal Dadlani and James Randi spoke publicly in support of Edamaruku.[16][17] On 31 July 2012, Edamaruku left India and settled in Finland.[12] As of 2014, the Catholic Secular Forum were still saying they would call for his prosecution if he returned to India.[12]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Water from the cross of Irla. Indian atheist accuses Church of". Archived from the original on 12 November 2020.
  2. ^ a b "Why Jesus wept in Mumbai: The church versus the rationalist". Archived from the original on 25 September 2019.
  3. ^ A Rationalist Fights to Disprove Miracles in India (Audio file). Public Radio International. 23 November 2012.
  4. ^ "Blasphemy law is unworthy of secular democracy". Firstpost. 4 December 2012. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
  5. ^ a b McDonald, Henry (23 November 2012). "Jesus wept … oh, it's bad plumbing. Indian rationalist targets 'miracles'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  6. ^ "Withdraw case against Sanal – John Dayal, Veteran journalist and member, National Integration Council – The Sunday Indian". www.thesundayindian.com. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
  7. ^ "'Rampal is a fraudster who exploits the gullible common man'". Hindustan Times. 19 November 2014. Retrieved 6 February 2023.
  8. ^ "Miracle in Irla brings Christians, Hindus and Muslims together in prayer". www.asianews.it. 14 March 2012. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  9. ^ "Church reacts to Irla cross incident | Mumbai News – Times of India". The Times of India. The Times of India. 12 March 2012. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  10. ^ White, Jon. "Miracle buster: Why I traced holy water to leaky drain". New Scientist. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  11. ^ "Why Jesus wept in Mumbai: The church versus the rationalist". Firstpost. 28 November 2012. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  12. ^ a b c d Dissanayake, Samanthi (3 June 2014). "The miracle-buster afraid to go home". BBC. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  13. ^ "Indian rationalists use Facebook to fight intolerance". BBC. 20 October 2015. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  14. ^ Brady, Kathy (July 2012). "Erlich, Radio Utopia: Postwar Audio Documentary in the Public Interest". Journal of Radio & Audio Media. 19 (2): 322–324. doi:10.1080/19376529.2012.722493. ISSN 1937-6529. S2CID 143793845.
  15. ^ Priyanka Dube (4 December 2012). "Indian rationalist stays in Finland fearing arrest for hurting religious sentiments". News18. Archived from the original on 8 December 2012. Retrieved 4 November 2019.
  16. ^ "A Matter of Very Great Concern". archive.randi.org. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  17. ^ "Support pours in for Indian rationalist forced to live in Finland". News18. Retrieved 25 September 2019.