User talk:Lil-unique1: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Lil-unique1/Archive 16) (bot |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<br/> |
<br/> |
||
<br/> |
<br/> |
||
==Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?== |
|||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> |
|||
[[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|left|100px]] |
|||
:::::'''Hi Lil-unique1, we need experienced volunteers.''' |
|||
::::* [[WP:NPP|New Page Patrol]] is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help. |
|||
::::* Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but <u>it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines</u>; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference. |
|||
::::* Kindly read <u>[[WP:NPP|the tutorial]]</u> before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. |
|||
::::* If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#Guidelines_for_granting|granting conditions]]. You can apply for the user-right '''[[WP:RFP/NPP|HERE]]'''. |
|||
::::* If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's [[WT:NPPR|discussion board]]. |
|||
::::* Cheers, and hope to see you around — <b><span style="background:#444;padding:2px 12px;font-size:12px"><span style="color:#FC0">❯❯❯</span>[[User:Raydann|<span style="color:#fff"> Raydann</span>]][[User talk:Raydann|<sup><i><span style="color:#D3D3D3">(Talk)</span></i></sup>]]</span></b> 09:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
== Opinion on chart == |
|||
Hey Lilunique, I’m not too sure if you’re familiar with charts but I was wondering if you knew anything on an Australian website called ''auspOp'' for ''ARIA''? Are they considered reliable? After looking at [[In My Defense]] it’s listed at reaching number 52. But I noticed user Ss112 was the one who added it back in 2019. Although it’s not mentioned on [[WP:CHARTS]] I figured I’d like to get your opinion on what you think… [[User:Pillowdelight|Pillowdelight]] ([[User talk:Pillowdelight|talk]]) 00:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:{{reply|Pillowdelight}} no idea tbh. SS112 is usually quite reliable and quite hot on this stuff, not that it automatically means they're always right by default. <span style="color:#01260d">>></span> [[User:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#01260d">'''Lil-unique1'''</span>]] <span style="color:#01260d">'''('''</span>[[User talk:Lil-unique1|<span style="color:#08752d">'''talk'''</span>]]<span style="color:#01260d">''')'''</span> — 21:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Charles III requested move discussion == |
== Charles III requested move discussion == |
||
Revision as of 05:23, 6 September 2023
It is currently 4:16 AM where this user lives.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is Lil-unique1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
 | This user has tried and failed to take a wikibreak. |
Charles III requested move discussion
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place
Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Pussycat Dolls article
You changed the discography page for The Pussycat Dolls to remove Out of This Club as a single, but the album article and singles articles still get edited to list. They’re inconsistent Friendlyhelper9949 (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Friendlyhelper9949, its not a single. A radio add date alone doesn't equal single. Songs can be sent to radio then cancelled like "Like A Surgeon (Ciara song)". It needs coverage after the fact that it was released and promoted as a single. I am old enough to remember when it came out and it definitely wasn't promoted, rather than assuming I'm wrong please consider whether or not you have understood the rules and change the content that's wrong. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 11:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm Into You
Hi, just wanna let you know that I'm mad at you for reverting my edits on I'm Into You. When I was editing an article by typing "(who also the featured artist)" for Lil Wayne, why on earth did you remove that term. It doesn’t make any sense. SuperSuperSonic207 (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Opinion
Hi again! Hope all is well, I have a question and would love your opinion. I’m not too sure how familiar you are with album/single certifications. But I’m in a dispute with an editor regarding certifications, if an album has a ref with its sales but the cert was updated after the article was published what is supposed to be in the box? [1] this user reverted it by bringing up a discussion I opened over 3 years ago regarding this type of issue. Yet I feel like I’m following what they’re stating. Majority of the time I’ve seen most users remove the sales after an updated cert is released due to it being “outdated”. I opened a discussion on their talk page but they’re insinuating that I’m wrong. I have also reached out to an admin due to this being the second incident I’ve had with this user. But I would like to get an opinion from you if you’re able to please, I opened a discussion herePillowdelight (talk) 06:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)