Talk:Interstate 69: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:29, 23 November 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interstate 69 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

U.S. Roads: Interstates C‑class Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Planned Canada to Mexico I-69

Having recently visited USA for the first time and seen the "future corridor" signs to the southwest of Houston, Texas I have been surfing the net and found out about the planned Canada to Mexico I-69. I feel this should be mentioned in the introduction to this article, not just under "Notes" and "External Links". --PeterR 16:58, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Temporary I-164 Designation in S. Indiana

Below is an excerpt of my e-mail reply explaining the possibility of the southernmost segment of I-69 (SIU 3) being temporarily signed as I-164.

The southernmost segment of I-69 in Indiana possibly being signed temporarily as I-164 is speculation at this time. Logically, it makes sense because the new section will not yet connect to any other portions of I-69, but it will start at the I-164 terminus and continue north for 13 miles. My thought is that once the remaining sections further north are built, tying into the existing I-69 at Indianapolis, the entire route will then be signed as I-69.

Signing a proposed Interstate route temporarily as a 3-digit spur of another Interstate is actually quite common, since the FHWA and AASHTO try to avoid having many discontinuous segments with the same 2-digit route number, which would be the case with I-69.

A similar approach is being taken with the Interstate 49 extension north to Kansas City and south to New Orleans: One section of I-49 west of New Orleans has been temporarily designated as I-310, and another segment in Arkansas has the temporary designation of I-540. Like I-164 in Indiana, I-310 and I-540 will be re-designated as I-49 once additional segments connecting it to the existing I-49 are built. --Wxstorm

Yellow segment

Can someone explain the yellow segment of the route near Brownsville, Texas? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I-94

Why is some of I-94 highlighted on the map? It doesn't make sense. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Can someone explain the yellow segment of the route near Brownsville, Texas? [[User:NintendoTTTEfan2005|NintendoTTTEfan2005]] ([[User talk:NintendoTTTEfan2005|talk]]) 18:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
+== I-94 ==
+Why is some of I-94 highlighted on the map? It doesn't make sense. [[User:NintendoTTTEfan2005|NintendoTTTEfan2005]] ([[User talk:NintendoTTTEfan2005|talk]]) 01:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)