Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RAPO23: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ravensfire (talk | contribs) Adding new report for RAPO23. |
Adding checkuser request (self-endorsed for checkuser attention), comment (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===13 October 2023=== |
===13 October 2023=== |
||
{{SPI case status|}} |
{{SPI case status|endorse}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=IAUH1982|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
{{sock list|1=IAUH1982|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*{{Requestandendorse}} - the behavioural evidence is clear enough but I'm endorsing CU as it seems like checks tend to turn up a few sleepers. Thanks, [[User:Spicy|Spicy]] ([[User talk:Spicy|talk]]) 23:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 23:36, 14 October 2023
RAPO23
RAPO23 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RAPO23/Archive.
13 October 2023
– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.
Suspected sockpuppets
- IAUH1982 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same edit [1] as prior sock [2]. Similar name format. Ravensfire (talk) 16:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - the behavioural evidence is clear enough but I'm endorsing CU as it seems like checks tend to turn up a few sleepers. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)