Jump to content

Talk:Mohali: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Anachronist moved page Talk:Ajit Singh Nagar to Talk:Mohali over redirect: Revert undiscussed move (WP:RMUM)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,192,574 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject India}}, {{WikiProject Cities}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject India|class=c|importance=mid|punjab=yes|punjab-importance=high|cities=yes|cities-importance=high|assess-date=April 2012}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid|punjab=yes|punjab-importance=high|cities=yes|cities-importance=high|assess-date=April 2012}}
⚫
{{WikiProject Cities }}
}}
{{Indian English}}
{{Indian English}}
⚫
{{WikiProject Cities |class=C |importance=mid}}

==Unofficial Mohali image==
==Unofficial Mohali image==
:Hi Sukh, and thanks for the friendly welcome. I see that you have removed the logo banner for Mohali, and while respecting your right to do so, I am afraid I have taken issue with it, and would like to lobby for its return. I understand that no other city pages have an opening banner. While this convention seems to be universal, sometimes you must think in new ways to better the end product. As Wikipedia is not a traditional encyclopedia, I do not feel that articles must adhere to the rules set out by paper encyclopedias. It is web-based, and in my experience, web pages with creative title banners reflecting the subject matter (Mohali), as well as its context (India) create more of an aesthetic appeal. The banner does not break any wikipedia rules ([[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages]]), looks nice, and accurately introduces the subject in a way that words cannot. [[User:Jaskaramdeep|Jaskaramdeep]] 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:Hi Sukh, and thanks for the friendly welcome. I see that you have removed the logo banner for Mohali, and while respecting your right to do so, I am afraid I have taken issue with it, and would like to lobby for its return. I understand that no other city pages have an opening banner. While this convention seems to be universal, sometimes you must think in new ways to better the end product. As Wikipedia is not a traditional encyclopedia, I do not feel that articles must adhere to the rules set out by paper encyclopedias. It is web-based, and in my experience, web pages with creative title banners reflecting the subject matter (Mohali), as well as its context (India) create more of an aesthetic appeal. The banner does not break any wikipedia rules ([[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages]]), looks nice, and accurately introduces the subject in a way that words cannot. [[User:Jaskaramdeep|Jaskaramdeep]] 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:33, 6 February 2024

Unofficial Mohali image

[edit]
Hi Sukh, and thanks for the friendly welcome. I see that you have removed the logo banner for Mohali, and while respecting your right to do so, I am afraid I have taken issue with it, and would like to lobby for its return. I understand that no other city pages have an opening banner. While this convention seems to be universal, sometimes you must think in new ways to better the end product. As Wikipedia is not a traditional encyclopedia, I do not feel that articles must adhere to the rules set out by paper encyclopedias. It is web-based, and in my experience, web pages with creative title banners reflecting the subject matter (Mohali), as well as its context (India) create more of an aesthetic appeal. The banner does not break any wikipedia rules (Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages), looks nice, and accurately introduces the subject in a way that words cannot. Jaskaramdeep 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I personally think it's inappropriate. Not because it's a banner or logo, but because it's not an official banner or logo. It would be much more appropriate to have a seal, or motto or something like that on the right hand side.
You're welcome to get input from other Wikipedians and I won't object if there is a consensus. However, I doubt other people would like it if I got a London logo, slapped a red bus on one side and a beefeater on the other, and stuck it at the top of London! I hope you appreciate my point.
PS - If you have any pictures of Chandigarh/Mohali they would be appreciated! Thanks. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 20:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The thing is, I've racked through hundreds of websites trying to find exactly that, without success. The only motto I could find was "The IT capital of India", and that can't be right; that's Bangalore. I'm assuming hyperbole with the London reference, but still the point can be made that if London didn't already have a coat of arms, it wouldn't be inappropriate to have the word LONDON flanked by an English flag and a Unicorn. Nonetheless, I'll ask around if you still feel it's wrong, just let me know Jaskaramdeep 21:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above text pasted from User talk:Jaskaramdeep. - Draeco 23:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The dispute is whether or not to include Image:Mohali logo.png, created by User:Jaskaramdeep, as a part of the Mohali article à la this edit. I'd like to commend both parties for maintaining great Wikiquette, and Jaskaramdeep in particluar for contributing robustly to the development of the article. As for my opinion: despite the creator's artistic skill and good intentions, the image remains unofficial and unconnected to Mohali except through himself. Therefore the image should not be included. - Draeco 06:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Daljit Singh

[edit]

I don't see how that para was relevant to an article on Mohali as such, and not PCA stadium. Buntygill 18:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new wiki

[edit]

priyanka —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.134.205.21 (talk) 03:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

wiki

[edit]

You are not currently logged in. While you are free to edit without logging in, your IP address (viewable on your talkpage, where you can check messages sent to your IP) will be recorded in this page's edit history. Creating an account will conceal your IP address and provide you with many other benefits.

priyanka priyanka

about getting district name

[edit]

hi this is sumeet i have read your article it was amazing but yo have missed the main thing that how and when mohali gets its district level image. mohali has been established from last 2-3 decades but how it becomes district and when. also you have mentioned places for visit are not in mohali they are in chandigarh panchkula so you should mention the places that are originally in mohali and are amazing to visit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.10.243 (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

मेरा विचार

[edit]

दोस्तो, मेरे ख्याल से इस article का नाम Mohali नहीं होना चाहिए. यह नाम पता नहीं कहाँ से पड़ गया. original नाम तो SAS Nagar है. कृपया इसकी अच्छे से जांच पड़ताल करें. Mohali एक corrupted नाम है. इसका नाम 'Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar' ही रखा गया था न कि mohali. धन्यवाद.

Rain & Thunderstorm (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Its original name is Mohali and SAS Nagar name was given much later.
  • Officially, in government records its name is Mohali and SAS Nagar is name of district

name reason

[edit]

what is mohali means —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.141.59 (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mohali means settlement. It was settlement of Rajputs earlier which was taken over by Sikhs and became part of Sikh Empire.

Query

[edit]

Is there another "MOHALI in pakistan or some else where? Is there any web page designing company named "ani wed Design" in Mohali?? Please reply me on my page by clicking here on "talk"NNKarnani (talk) 07:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Change in Name

[edit]

I plan to move the article to new name of Mohali i.e. Ajitgarh. Does anyone has any problem?Vigyani (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move done. Vigyani (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Redirection. Till things are not official; we shall not take such steps. Officially, Mohali is name of City. SAS Nagar is name of district. Ajitgarh is not used.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mohali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mohali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mohali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mohali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mohali&oldid=1204041102"